20/20 cricket could takeover football |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
cpr87
Trialist
Joined: 20 November 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: 20/20 cricket could takeover footballPosted: 21 November 2008 at 4:20am |
|
I found this
article from the Bleachers Report website Soccer no1 in 226 countries
but 20/20 cricket can conquer all(by Joe Kidwell member) Heres just a one part
Here is a list of countries where soccer is not No. 1: Baseball is No. 1 in eight different countries which include the Panama, Venezuela, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Japan, Nicaragua, Northern Marianas, Taiwan. Cricket is No. 1 in eight countries. British Guyana, Antigua and Barbuda, Trinidad and Tobago, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Australia. Rugby is No 1 in five countries, which include Fiji, Western Samoa, Tonga, New Zealand, Wales. Basketball is No. 1 in five countries: the Philippines, Lithuania, Puerto Rico, Marshall Islands, and the Bahamas. Following behind is Ice Hockey, which is No. 1 in four countries including Canada, Finland, Latvia, and Estonia. The other sports are all tied with being No. 1 in only one country. Archery: Bhutan; Wrestling: Mongolia; AFL: Nauru; and Gaelic Football: Ireland Republic. And of course American football only in the United States. Out of the 261 independent nations and dependencies, the rest of the 226 independent nations/ dependencies in the world, is where soccer is No. 1 HOWEVER 20/20 cricket is likely to change the status of football. If the new version develops as many commentators expect, there will be a proliferation of domestic leagues around the world, and cricket may end up being the most powerful sport on the planet. 20/20 cricket is the first version of cricket that is suitable to a home and away format run along the lines of a football competition. A typical game starts at 5.30pm and is over by 8pm. Fans could watch the game after work, or as part of their weekly routine. Like baseball in America, 20/20 is also a version of sport that can be played more than once a week. Potentially, a team in a domestic 20/20 cricket league could play 3 to 4 times a week, and pull annual crowds three times more than that of the football codes. At present, Australia has been relatively inactive on the 20/20 front. It is in India and the West Indies where most of the revolutions are going on. In the West Indies, an American, Alan Stanford, has seen the potential 20/20 to form a bridge between South and North America. With more than 20 countries involved, Stanford's 20/20 tournament is numerically the largest tournament in the Americas. Admittedly, the largest countries of the region, such as Brazil and the United States, are not represented. However, teams could be contrived relatively simply and if so, both would be fertile markets for television. If so, a small sport could grow in a very rapid pace. |
|
![]() |
|
Sledger
Captain
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law ! Joined: 08 August 2005 Location: South Africa Online Status: Offline Posts: 15694 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 November 2008 at 5:15am |
Just shows what a wonderful game baseball really is. |
|
|
Mental disintegration works for me !!
|
|
![]() |
|
bladescape
Wicket-Keeper
Excellence in the making Joined: 14 June 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1809 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 November 2008 at 6:33am |
|
I hope that was sarcasm!
|
|
|
You know, I'm trying to decide whether to change my siggy or not...
|
|
![]() |
|
Sledger
Captain
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law ! Joined: 08 August 2005 Location: South Africa Online Status: Offline Posts: 15694 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 November 2008 at 6:37am |
|
Sarcasm , me ?
|
|
|
Mental disintegration works for me !!
|
|
![]() |
|
bladescape
Wicket-Keeper
Excellence in the making Joined: 14 June 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1809 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 November 2008 at 6:07am |
|
I think I might have been refering to you!
|
|
|
You know, I'm trying to decide whether to change my siggy or not...
|
|
![]() |
|
cpr87
Trialist
Joined: 20 November 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 January 2009 at 2:12am |
|
can i please have some more serious answers
|
|
![]() |
|
bladescape
Wicket-Keeper
Excellence in the making Joined: 14 June 2008 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1809 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 January 2009 at 11:32am |
|
I think it's a wonderful thing to have the America's start to play cricket on a constant basis.
This is a very big step in cricket taking over baseball's No.1 spot in the above mentioned American countries. I hope it continues. |
|
|
You know, I'm trying to decide whether to change my siggy or not...
|
|
![]() |
|
betterpolo
3rd Man
Joined: 30 June 2008 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 247 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 January 2009 at 7:59pm |
|
Hi cpr, thanks for posting that article. I have got some feedback about it but I'm afraid it's not very positive! It's personal view of course but I think it's a poor article for a few reasons. Here goes...
1. I don't necessarily see the growth of sports I love as a positive. The globalisation of football has been horrible and detrimental to the game and I fear the same happening to cricket with the increased commercialisation we are seeing. 2. It's great to see new people start playing a sport and getting involved in local clubs, schools etc. However, massive growth of a sport also attracts a disproportionately high number of numpty supporters - those who haven't played the game, have little depth of understanding and are mainly attracted by the hype and glitz. 3. The article does not state how a sport becomes 'number one' in any one country. Is it based on the number of professional players, the number of all participants at all levels, the number of supporters who attend games, the number who watch on TV, the number of people abroad who watch it on TV, overall wealth, size of TV deal etc etc? Wales may be a great rugby playing country but do more people go to top level club games than go to watch Swansea, Cardiff etc. in league football? 4. How is 'number of countries' a measure of anything. If Sport A is number one in China and Sport B is number one in Wales, the Falkland Islands and St Lucia does Sport B win 3-1? Is Sport B more popular or more powerful as a result? 5. The article does not address anywhere the cultural influences that make a sport popular in a particular country. The traditions of sports and their clubs, the history of clubs and tournaments, the ties that are handed down through generations. The article doesn't say anywhere why 2020 is a 'sport' that would displace any of these factors, beyond saying that it is a short enough game to fit several into a week. No offence cpr, but I don't really see where the authors of this are coming from
|
|
![]() |
|
flipper
Square Leg
Joined: 27 August 2005 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 488 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 January 2009 at 9:42pm |
|
Poor article really. Cricket will never be more popular than [FOOTBALL] not soccer, hate that word and in all honesty I don't want it to. Mainly because of the same reasons as the excellent post by betterpolo
above points out.
|
|
|
Warwickshire County Cricket, Edgbaston Birmingham England. County Champions 2012
|
|
![]() |
|
cpr87
Trialist
Joined: 20 November 2008 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 4 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2009 at 3:23am |
|
Just a quick note about the Bleacher report. It's says Cricket is tops
in Aus. As a summer sport Yes. But if this is based purely on
attendance figures then AFL would be the national sport by far. In fact
Cricket Australia has just replaced the traditional ODI Tri-series with
two separate series due to waning interest yet as mentioned above the
domestic Twenty20 tournament has become very popular.
Also I've heard rumours from various Americans I've chatted to that Baseball is experiencing a slight decrease in popularity. No matter how much I love cricket I wouldn't of expected any bat and ball sport to be more popular than the round and oval ball sports with their continuous action and entertainment value anyway. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |