<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : England&#039;s Lifeline to Success</title>
  <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Twenty20 World Cup : England&#039;s Lifeline to Success</description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.71</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4101</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : You are right about not writing...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151923#151923</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=584">daisy77</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 August 2007 at 6:38pm<br /><br />You are right about not writing off England. As you said they have different players and it's a totally different game so they have as much chance as any of the other teams. ]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151923#151923</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : True mate, I really don&amp;#039;t...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151681#151681</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=837">spin wizard</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 August 2007 at 6:55pm<br /><br />True mate, I really don't like it. In the Stanford 2020 in the caribbean, the skippers were the ones with the mic.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151681#151681</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : Hate it personally. They&amp;#039;re...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151597#151597</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2297">bondy</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 August 2007 at 11:08am<br /><br />Hate it personally. They're playing a professional sport and should be removed from emotional invigilation while doing so.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151597#151597</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : it depends which player is on...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151593#151593</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=739">Clobber</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 August 2007 at 10:53am<br /><br />it depends which player is on it - Dominic Cork is always good value]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151593#151593</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : Fair enough. It can add a bit...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151580#151580</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3131">samhache</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 August 2007 at 10:13am<br /><br />Fair enough. It can add a bit of humour I suppose.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151580#151580</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : I&amp;#039;m not bothered by the mics...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151578#151578</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=229">Sledger</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 August 2007 at 10:04am<br /><br />&nbsp; I'm not bothered by the mics , but I don't rave over themeither. The players say little of interest and sometimes the questionsasked are downright silly.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151578#151578</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : the on-field discussions are something...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151571#151571</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=739">Clobber</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 August 2007 at 9:55am<br /><br />the on-field discussions are something I enjoy although Sky have cut back on them during the last couple of seasons and now you tend to have 2 players in the fielding side with mics and they will talk to the commentary box just the once each during an innings]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151571#151571</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : When they first did it in an Australian...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151569#151569</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3131">samhache</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 August 2007 at 9:52am<br /><br />When they first did it in an Australian game, i couldn't believe my eyes! Gilly was about to hit the bowl, whilst he was talking on the microphone! Sledge, i thought you especially, would be cringing at the sight of such an atroscity!! <img src="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif" height="17" width="17" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="Wink" />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151569#151569</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : Steve Elworthy , the tournament...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151537#151537</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=229">Sledger</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 17 August 2007 at 7:59am<br /><br />&nbsp; Steve Elworthy , the tournament organiser said that the eventwill closely follow the method used in local T20 competitions. Fromthat , I take it that on-field mics will be part of the game - alongwith the miner's helmets , dancing girls and rock music !<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Just what would Douglas Jardine make of that!<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151537#151537</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : Guys, Australia has the best chance...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151445#151445</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3131">samhache</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 16 August 2007 at 9:01pm<br /><br />Guys, Australia has the best chance of winning. Their power hitters are likely to thrive in this environment...and I've seen Gilly, Ponting and Symonds in full 20/20 attack mode. Do you reckon they'll ask for microphones while on the field, so the commentators can converse with them? (by the way who else found that incredibly strange)]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151445#151445</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : I Don&amp;#039;t see a problem with...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151399#151399</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=837">spin wizard</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 16 August 2007 at 4:15pm<br /><br />I Don't see a problem with the Aussies squad. That side can Play all form of the game and win easily still. Hayden can hit them, we all know what Gilly can do; Clarke and Symonds can murder the ball and Hussey has played some cameos in his career all ready. Bracken's good with the ball in limited overs, well, Lee, he might go for a few but can take wickets still and is handy with the bat. I'll have my money on them than any other side but this game is too unpredictable, any of the test nations can win it.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151399#151399</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success :  If Monty just randomly pressed...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151338#151338</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3485">Max Power</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 16 August 2007 at 11:38am<br /><br />If Monty just randomly pressed &#091;enter&#093; every now and then it would help too.<br><br>I think England have more of a chance fielding this squad then if they had just stuck to the ODI squad.<br><br>I think the so called 'specialists' have earned a chance. Whether they will perform or not is anyone's guess.<br><br>I think Australia will probably do fine with the squad they have named, because, as has been mentioned, they will adapt. They are the world leaders of cricket at the moment and IMO are so far ahead of any other nation that even with their relative lack of T20 experience they could probably easily go on to win.<br><br><img src="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/smileys/smiley1.gif" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="Smile" /><br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by Homer S - 16 August 2007 at 11:38am</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151338#151338</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success :  Originally posted by Montywell...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151269#151269</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=229">Sledger</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 16 August 2007 at 6:43am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Monty</strong></em><br /><br />well i as just saying that the aussies have theitr own20/20 compettion and, im not a grewat follower but...., surely theyllhave specialists like england do. iI meant that if you compare the TESTside from the ashes in australia, they have just nearly picked the sameside which may not be suited to 20/20, that for me is the problem withaustralia, they have their so called "stars" like gilchrist etc andthey then use them for EVERY&nbsp; format of the game, for all theyknow they could have a player which was appaling at tests but yet wouldhit hundred after hundred&nbsp;but they would not pick him because theystick woth that same XI for EVERYTHING&nbsp;</td></tr></table><br><br>&nbsp;Last chance saloon lad. Attempt to punctuate your ramblings properly or I'll start mass deletions<b>(.)</b>&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;  that's a full stop in the brackets.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151269#151269</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : So wich one of the squad isn&amp;#039;t...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151243#151243</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2137">143no</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 11:43pm<br /><br />So wich one of the squad isn't suited to 20/20 monty?<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Our 20/20 comp is only very new, it's also not serious, they have been bringing in celebrities to play&nbsp;to try and boost crowds, it's purley an entertainment thing.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151243#151243</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : i know but if you think about...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151235#151235</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3685">Monty</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 11:19pm<br /><br />i know but if you think about it the only changes from the one day squad from the test squad is hogg for warne, lee for mcgrath, and watson for langer and all 3 of those people that are out are retired so this IS probably the test squad now anyway]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151235#151235</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : Nah, they&amp;#039;ve stuck with the...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151233#151233</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=19">-JP-</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 11:16pm<br /><br />Nah, they've stuck with the one-day side Monty. Lee in for McGrath is the only difference. Hodge has a fantastic Twenty20 record, I'm less sure about the others but Australia have confidence in their players to adapt. As they are world leaders, they'll probably cope just fine.<br><br>Mind, Cameron White might be miffed seeing as he is the T20 record score-holder at not getting a look in.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151233#151233</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : well i as just saying that the...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151228#151228</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3685">Monty</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 11:07pm<br /><br />well i as just saying that the aussies have theitr own 20/20 compettion and, im not a grewat follower but...., surely theyll have specialists like england do. iI meant that if you compare the TEST side from the ashes in australia, they have just nearly picked the same side which may not be suited to 20/20, that for me is the problem with australia, they have their so called "stars" like gilchrist etc and they then use them for EVERY&nbsp; format of the game, for all they know they could have a player which was appaling at tests but yet would hit hundred after hundred&nbsp;but they would not pick him because they stick woth that same XI for EVERYTHING&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151228#151228</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success :   Originally posted by MontyEngand...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151224#151224</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=19">-JP-</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 11:00pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Monty</strong></em><br /><br />Engand have so far been written off by, <strong>everyone, </strong>but they are the only team, bar South Africa, that have left out test players for specialists at the county game. That might give them a lifeline. Look for example how many Australian players in the squad were in the Ashes test series? Nearly everyone. But England on the other matter, didn't field, Snape, Kirtley, Schofield, as they are taking a damn good risk at having a good chance of winning this tournament. This should give England some believers.<div>&nbsp;</div><div>Your thoughts?</div></td></tr></table><br><br>It's an admirable defence Monty, but they haven't <b>tried </b>these guys at international Twenty20 level. Yes, most have played international cricket before but not at Twenty20 level, where instead we stuck with the Bells, the Andersons etc.<br><br>All that does is put added pressure on the specialists; everyone is expecting them to be able to perform, just because they have done it at domestic level. <br><br>And we're not the only side to pick Twenty20 specialists either. <br><br>And what relevance does The Ashes have to a Twenty20 tournament?<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151224#151224</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success :  Originally posted by Montyjust...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151217#151217</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3834">DDRickyDD</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 10:41pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Monty</strong></em><br /><br />just looking at the signature of DDRickyDD but arent SA no1 in ODI's?</td></tr></table> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>They were just before the world cup. but Australia regained no. 1 spot after the world cup.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151217#151217</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : just looking at the signature...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151206#151206</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3685">Monty</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 9:24pm<br /><br />just looking at the signature of DDRickyDD but arent SA no1 in ODI's?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151206#151206</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : I don&amp;#039;t think everyone has...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151205#151205</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=837">spin wizard</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 9:23pm<br /><br />I don't think everyone has written England off! This is the shortest format of the game and anything can happen.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151205#151205</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : Probably lose in the super 8&amp;#039;s...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151167#151167</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3834">DDRickyDD</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 6:59pm<br /><br /><P>Probably lose in the super 8's</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151167#151167</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>England&#039;s Lifeline to Success : Engand have so far been written...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151162#151162</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3685">Monty</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4101<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 15 August 2007 at 6:54pm<br /><br />Engand have so far been written off by, <strong>everyone, </strong>but they are the only team, bar South Africa, that have left out test players for specialists at the county game. That might give them a lifeline. Look for example how many Australian players in the squad were in the Ashes test series? Nearly everyone. But England on the other matter, didn't field, Snape, Kirtley, Schofield, as they are taking a damn good risk at having a good chance of winning this tournament. This should give England some believers.<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Your thoughts?</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4101&amp;PID=151162#151162</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>