Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Monty or Gilo? http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Cricket World Ratings : Monty or Gilo? Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Wed, 22 May 2013 17:11:26 +0000 Mon, 15 May 2006 06:10:32 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.71 360 www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1754 Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_images/logo.png http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ Monty or Gilo? : we have a thread on this topic... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51653#51653 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1754
Posted: 15 May 2006 at 6:10am

we have a thread on this topic already fellas.]]> Mon, 15 May 2006 06:10:32 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51653#51653 Monty or Gilo? : that is quite possibly true as... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51625#51625 Author: Hugo
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 10:24pm

that is quite possibly true as AK bends the truth somewhat about what he claims he knows about cricket as we have all seen before on numerous threads on the forum.]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 22:24:33 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51625#51625 Monty or Gilo? : Originally posted by ANIL... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51621#51621 Author: Clobber
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 10:17pm

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE

Loudon is the best



I'm guessing here but I strongly suspect you've never actually seen Loudon bowl
]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 22:17:20 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51621#51621 Monty or Gilo? : Originally posted by sosolidsinghMonty... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51605#51605 Author: skip_eng
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 8:39pm

Originally posted by sosolidsingh

Monty definetly. Giles will not improve whereas Panesar has massive potential. England keep banging on that their major weakness is the lack of a world class spinner which is of course true but with Monty there is the possibilty that within 5 years if given a run in the team he could win matches for England by bowling out teams in the 4th innings - something Giles cannot do.

dont make comments you cant back up.....ashley giles has bowled many sides out in the 4th innings. look at his stats! 

]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 20:39:12 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51605#51605 Monty or Gilo? : giles is a good bowler but monty... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51579#51579 Author: warnester
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 7:15pm

giles is a good bowler but monty looks a bit more solid at the moment, lets hope he can turn our way to victory tommorow]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 19:15:05 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51579#51579 Monty or Gilo? : Giles right now has got little... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51542#51542 Author: mazzybabe.uk
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 2:44pm

Giles right now has got little spin but a brilliant quicker ball]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 14:44:18 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51542#51542 Monty or Gilo? : Monty definetly. Giles will not... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51536#51536 Author: sosolidsingh
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 1:58pm

Monty definetly. Giles will not improve whereas Panesar has massive potential. England keep banging on that their major weakness is the lack of a world class spinner which is of course true but with Monty there is the possibilty that within 5 years if given a run in the team he could win matches for England by bowling out teams in the 4th innings - something Giles cannot do.

Edited by sosolidsingh]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 13:58:55 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51536#51536 Monty or Gilo? : Haha another one about this??... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51512#51512 Author: darlo_lad
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 12:59pm

Haha another one about this?? There is already a massive topic about this issue.............

I would say giles, for now, but Monty for the future.

]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 12:59:47 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51512#51512 Monty or Gilo? : Loudon is the best,but since this... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51493#51493 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 10:39am

Loudon is the best,but since this is between Panesar and Giles probably Giles but when it comes to the ahses I wanna see Panesar play at the SCG he should trouble the aussie batsman with his spin.But Ashley Giles overral is the better with bat and ball.

]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 10:39:33 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51493#51493 Monty or Gilo? : Of course Giles. Giles would be... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51476#51476 Author: crownmethod
Subject: 1754
Posted: 14 May 2006 at 9:59am

Of course Giles. Giles would be the key when the Ashes start.  Great player, he can bat, he can bowl and he can field. Pansnear doesn't have enough experience. Yes, and Giles is England's best spinner, and Im sure he'll pick up loads of wickets during the SCG match, and the Adelaide Oval match. Those 2 pitches would certainly favour his style of bowling.]]> Sun, 14 May 2006 09:59:04 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51476#51476 Monty or Gilo? : giles is undoubtedly englands... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51403#51403 Author: skip_eng
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 11:41pm

giles is undoubtedly englands best spinner! this wannabe going by the name of panesar will be out when ashley returns! panesar took two wickets from bad shots, hanging the bat out! and leezy u shouldnt be allowed to start this thread cos of the bit under ure name! thats terrible! there is already a topic on this! so sledger or jp, do the decent thing and shut this stupid thread down please!]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 23:41:14 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51403#51403 Monty or Gilo? : he has to be englands best bowler... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51394#51394 Author: wccc
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 10:33pm

he has to be englands best bowler who can bat not including freddie]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 22:33:55 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51394#51394 Monty or Gilo? : 12 @ 57 iirc. He contributed... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51392#51392 Author: Sureshot
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 10:30pm

 12 @ 57 iirc.

He contributed as much with the bat as the ball.

For number 8 Loudon is better than Giles.

]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 22:30:05 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51392#51392 Monty or Gilo? : But he still gets wickets when... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51387#51387 Author: wccc
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 10:13pm

But he still gets wickets when needed like in the ashes (for all you aussies)]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 22:13:30 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51387#51387 Monty or Gilo? : I agree Giles doesn't spin... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51385#51385 Author: Top Cat
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 10:06pm

I agree Giles doesn't spin it much.]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 22:06:30 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51385#51385 Monty or Gilo? : Giles doesn't spin the ball... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51379#51379 Author: wccc
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 9:56pm

Giles doesn't spin the ball while Monty can.]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 21:56:23 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51379#51379 Monty or Gilo? : At the moment i would rather have... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51378#51378 Author: Top Cat
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 9:55pm

At the moment i would rather have Panesar as England's first choice spinner!]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 21:55:04 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51378#51378 Monty or Gilo? : In advance of you-know-who getting... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51349#51349 Author: Clobber
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 9:14pm

In advance of you-know-who getting in here all excited I would say fornow I would rather have Giles in the team - mostly because of thebalance Gilo brings to the side with decent bowling, capable battingand solid fielding.

Monty can keep developing and in time should be a match winner in his own right.]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 21:14:29 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51349#51349 Monty or Gilo? : Following his recent form, do... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51347#51347 Author: Leezy
Subject: 1754
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 9:04pm

Following his recent form, do you think it is time for panesar to become England's first choice spinner ahead of the king of Spain?]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 21:04:59 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1754&PID=51347#51347