Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest

Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Cricket World Ratings : Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sun, 19 May 2013 00:41:01 +0000 Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:04:56 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.71 360 www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2402 Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_images/logo.png http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Stop this nonsense .this is a... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=95488#95488 Author: dips_december
Subject: 2402
Posted: 05 November 2006 at 7:04am

Stop this nonsense .this is a macgill thread if u want to compare rihards vs don do it in another thread please]]> Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:04:56 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=95488#95488 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Have you got any stats for this... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=95048#95048 Author: fishcake14
Subject: 2402
Posted: 02 November 2006 at 8:54pm

Have you got any stats for this guy, Bobbi?

Edited by fishcake14]]> Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:54:03 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=95048#95048 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Atleast MacGill has been given... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=95042#95042 Author: BOBBI
Subject: 2402
Posted: 02 November 2006 at 8:42pm

Atleast MacGill has been given the opportunty to represent his country as many times as he has. Richards was a class above all bar the Don, yet was only given 4 test matches to show his class in tests. You could also say Jamie Siddons is the unluckiest. MacGill has been given more oportunities than many so do not cry for a guy who has taken nearly 200 wickets.]]> Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:42:41 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=95042#95042 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Blimey dips, that was a lot of... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=94939#94939 Author: slogger72N/O
Subject: 2402
Posted: 02 November 2006 at 8:12am

Blimey dips, that was a lot of stats, i gave up after the first few because there were just too many.]]> Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:12:35 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=94939#94939 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : why? http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=94820#94820 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2402
Posted: 01 November 2006 at 9:08pm

why?]]> Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:08:09 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=94820#94820 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : It basically tells us that Warne... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=94768#94768 Author: BOBBI
Subject: 2402
Posted: 01 November 2006 at 2:34pm

It basically tells us that Warne is a master and MacGill, whilst a very good bowler is not in the same class.

By the way Barry Richards is the unluckiest cricketer of all time.

]]> Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:34:36 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=94768#94768 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : unreadable i can't understand... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89733#89733 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2402
Posted: 06 October 2006 at 8:26pm

unreadable

i can't understand it]]> Fri, 06 Oct 2006 20:26:41 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89733#89733 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : That was a really long statistic.... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89657#89657 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2402
Posted: 06 October 2006 at 12:56pm

That was a really long statistic.

]]> Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:56:29 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89657#89657 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Yep although Warney has more control... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89625#89625 Author: dips_december
Subject: 2402
Posted: 06 October 2006 at 11:43am

Yep although Warney has more control over his spin ,Macca always tends to take more wickets when both play together .

Here it is :

Mat Runs HS   BatAv 100 50   W    BB BowlAv 5w Ct St

overall          ;      40   347 43   10.20   0   0 198 8/108 27.20 12 16 0
                      140 2958 99   16.61   0 11 685 8/71   25.25 36 120 0

v Bangladesh        &n bsp; 4     0   0     -     0   0 33 8/108 15.75 4   2 0
                      2    11   6    5.50   0   0 11 5/113 27.27 1   1 0
v England          ;     6    71 43    8.87   0   0 39 7/50   24.71 3   5 0
                      31   750 90   19.23   0   3 172 8/71   22.30 10 25 0
v ICC World XI         1     0   0     -     0   0   9 5/43    9.11 1   0 0
                      1    12   7    6.00   0   0   6 3/23   11.83 0   0 0
v India         & nbsp;      4     2   1    0.50   0   0 14 4/86   50.78 0   2 0
                      14   309 86   14.71   0   1 43 6/125 47.18 1 10 0
v New Zealand          ; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      20   558 99   32.82   0   5 103 6/31   24.37 3 18 0
v Pakistan        &nbs p;    4    63 23* 31.50   0   0 23 5/66   25.30 2   1 0
                      15   275 86   16.17   0   1 90 7/23   20.17 6 13 0
v South Africa         4    63 29   15.75   0   0 18 4/123 28.44 0   2 0
                      24   460 63   13.93   0   1 130 7/56   24.16 7 19 0
v Sri Lanka         & nbsp; 2    25 17* 25.00   0   0   5 4/74   46.40 0   0 0
                      13   193 35   10.72   0   0 59 5/43   25.54 5 15 0
v West Indies         14   123 22    8.20   0   0 55 7/104 31.27 2   4 0
                      19   384 47   13.71   0   0 65 7/52   29.95 3 19 0
v Zimbabwe        &nbs p;    1     -   -     -     -   -   2 2/54   32.00 0   0 0
                      1     6   6    6.00   0   0   6 3/68   22.83 0   0 0

in Australia        &nb sp; 25   231 43   11.55   0   0 130 7/50   26.24 9 14 0
                      64 1337 99   17.59   0   7 296 8/71   26.08 14 66 0
in Bangladesh        &n bsp; 2     0   0     -     0   0 16 8/108 18.81 1   0 0
                      2    11   6    5.50   0   0 11 5/113 27.27 1   1 0
in England          ;    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      22   563 90   21.65   0   2 129 7/165 21.94 8 17 0
in India         & nbsp;     0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      9   193 39   12.86   0   0 34 6/125 43.11 1   6 0
in New Zealand         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      9   138 50* 17.25   0   1 49 5/39   21.30 1   6 0
in Pakistan        &nbs p;   3    54 23* 27.00   0   0 15 5/66   27.46 1   1 0
                      3    69 33   17.25   0   0 18 6/136 28.00 2   2 0
in South Africa        0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      12   294 63   16.33   0   1 61 6/86   24.31 2   9 0
in Sri Lanka         & nbsp; 2    25 17* 25.00   0   0   5 4/74   46.40 0   0 0
                      9   151 35   10.06   0   0 48 7/94   20.45 6   6 0
in U.A.E.               0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      2    30 19   15.00   0   0 16 5/74    9.62 1   2 0
in West Indies         8    37 17    3.36   0   0 32 5/75   32.18 1   1 0
                      7   166 32   15.09   0   0 17 4/70   39.64 0   5 0
in Zimbabwe        &nbs p;   0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      1     6   6    6.00   0   0   6 3/68   22.83 0   0 0

in Africa               0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      13   300 63   15.78   0   1 67 6/86   24.17 2   9 0
in Americas        &nbs p;   8    37 17    3.36   0   0 32 5/75   32.18 1   1 0
                      7   166 32   15.09   0   0 17 4/70   39.64 0   5 0
in Asia         &n bsp;      7    79 23* 26.33   0   0 36 8/108 26.25 2   1 0
                      25   454 39   11.94   0   0 127 7/94   26.81 11 17 0
in Europe               0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      22   563 90   21.65   0   2 129 7/165 21.94 8 17 0
in Oceania          ;   25   231 43   11.55   0   0 130 7/50   26.24 9 14 0
                      73 1475 99   17.55   0   8 345 8/71   25.40 15 72 0

home         &n bsp;        25   231 43   11.55   0   0 130 7/50   26.24 9 14 0
                      64 1337 99   17.59   0   7 296 8/71   26.08 14 66 0
away         &n bsp;        15   116 23*   8.28   0   0 68 8/108 29.04 3   2 0
                      73 1591 90   16.23   0   4 362 7/165 25.50 20 52 0
neutral          ;       0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      3    30 19    7.50   0   0 27 7/94   12.66 2   2 0

1992         &n bsp;         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                        5   100 35   12.50   0   0 12 7/52   41.91 1   2 0
1993                    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                       16   283 74* 23.58   0   1 72 6/31   23.56 2 12 0
1994                    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                       10   134 33    8.93   0   0 70 8/71   18.20 6   6 0
1995                    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                       12   119 36*   9.15   0   0 52 7/23   24.11 1 10 0
1996                    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                        4   113 33   22.60   0   0 15 4/95   38.06 0   4 0
1997                    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                       15   360 53   15.65   0   1 68 6/48   24.42 2   7 0
1998                    7   127 43   18.14   0   0 35 5/66   26.20 1   4 0
                        5   121 35   17.28   0   0 24 6/34   33.16 2   5 0
1999                    5    37 17    3.70   0   0 24 7/50   19.12 2   4 0
                       13   347 86   19.27   0   2 38 5/52   32.97 2 13 0
2000                    3    43 19   21.50   0   0   9 2/37   34.33 0   2 0
                        4    36 12    9.00   0   0 15 4/68   33.06 0   5 0
2001                    1     1   1    1.00   0   0   7 7/104 27.42 1   1 0
                       13   312 99   19.50   0   2 58 7/165 31.18 4 14 0
2002                    2    20 20   20.00   0   0 14 5/152 31.00 1   1 0
                       10   313 63   26.08   0   2 67 7/94   19.55 3   8 0
2004                    3    25 17* 25.00   0   0   6 4/74   73.83 0   0 0
                       12   211 53* 11.72   0   1 70 6/125 24.07 5 17 0
2005                    5    55 22   27.50   0   0 26 5/43   19.61 2   0 0
                       15   416 90   20.80   0   2 96 6/46   22.02 6 15 0
2006                    3    29 29   29.00   0   0 20 8/108 21.80 1   0 0
                        6    93 36   13.28   0   0 28 6/86   31.21 2   2 0
2003                    11    10   4*   1.11   0   0 57 5/56   29.59 4   4 0
                        0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -

season 1991/92         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      2    28 20    9.33   0   0   1 1/150 228.00 0   1 0
season 1992         &n bsp; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      2    66 35   22.00   0   0   3 3/11   52.66 0   1 0
season 1992/93         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      7    91 22* 10.11   0   0 27 7/52   21.07 1   4 0
season 1993         &n bsp; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      6   113 37   37.66   0   0 34 5/82   25.79 1   4 0
season 1993/94         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      9   142 74* 15.77   0   1 51 7/56   18.58 3   6 0
season 1994/95         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      12   157 36*   8.72   0   0 60 8/71   24.31 4   9 0
season 1995/96         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      6    72 33   18.00   0   0 31 7/23   20.35 1   5 0
season 1996/97         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      8   170 30   14.16   0   0 33 4/43   26.54 0   9 0
season 1997         &n bsp; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      6   188 53   18.80   0   1 24 6/48   24.04 1   2 0
season 1997/98         1    10 10   10.00   0   0   5 3/22   26.80 0   1 0
                      9   203 36   16.91   0   0 49 6/34   29.24 3   5 0
season 1998/99        11   154 43    9.62   0   0 54 7/50   23.00 3   7 0
                      4   148 32   21.14   0   0   4 1/43   94.50 0   5 0
season 1999         &n bsp; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      3     6   6    1.50   0   0   8 5/52   14.37 1   2 0
season 1999/00         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      10   229 86   20.81   0   2 41 5/110 30.63 1 11 0
season 2000/01         4    44 19   14.66   0   0 16 7/104 31.31 1   3 0
                      3    50 39   10.00   0   0 10 4/47   50.50 0   2 0
season 2001         &n bsp; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      5    13   8    3.25   0   0 31 7/165 18.70 3   6 0
season 2001/02         1    20 20   20.00   0   0   7 4/123 24.85 0   1 0
                      9   415 99   34.58   0   3 43 6/161 31.27 2 11 0
season 2002/03         6     8   4*   1.60   0   0 32 5/75   36.37 2   0 0
                      6   147 57   21.00   0   1 41 7/94   16.80 2   3 0
season 2003         &n bsp; 2     -   -     -     -   - 17 5/56   12.88 3   2 0
                      0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
season 2003/04         7    27 17*   5.40   0   0 21 4/74   47.95 0   2 0
                      3    79 32   13.16   0   0 26 5/43   20.03 4   3 0
season 2004         &n bsp; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      2     9   4    2.25   0   0 10 4/70   28.00 0   4 0
season 2004/05         1     9   9*    -     0   0   8 5/87   21.25 1   0 0
                      11   192 53* 17.45   0   2 56 6/125 25.94 2 14 0
season 2005         &n bsp; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      5   249 90   27.66   0   1 40 6/46   19.92 3   5 0
season 2005/06         7    75 29   25.00   0   0 38 8/108 20.42 2   0 0
                      12   191 47   12.73   0   0 62 6/80   26.16 4   8 0

toss won         &nb sp;    23   222 43    9.65   0   0 109 7/50   26.16 7 14 0
                      67 1347 86   14.64   0   4 326 8/71   24.36 22 53 0
toss lost         &n bsp;   17   125 29   11.36   0   0 89 8/108 28.48 5   2 0
                      73 1611 99   18.73   0   7 359 7/56   26.05 14 67 0

toss won & batted     18   142 23*   7.10   0   0 78 7/50   30.19 4   9 0
                      54 1103 86   14.32   0   3 264 8/71   24.66 18 40 0
toss won & fielded     5    80 43   26.66   0   0 31 5/56   16.03 3   5 0
                      13   244 86   16.26   0   1 62 6/46   23.11 4 13 0
toss lost & sent in    3     1   1    0.50   0   0 15 5/75   24.26 1   0 0
                      25   556 70   18.53   0   3 91 6/64   29.96 2 25 0
toss lost & fielded   14   124 29   13.77   0   0 74 8/108 29.33 4   2 0
                      48 1055 99   18.83   0   4 268 7/56   24.72 12 42 0

matches batting 1st   21   143 23*   6.50   0   0 93 7/50   29.23 5   9 0
                      79 1659 86   15.50   0   6 355 8/71   26.02 20 65 0
matches fielding 1st 19   204 43   17.00   0   0 105 8/108 25.40 7   7 0
                      61 1299 99   18.29   0   5 330 7/56   24.42 16 55 0

1st team innings      40   302 43   12.58   0   0 106 8/108 27.26 6   8 0
                      140 2220 99   18.19   0 10 341 7/23   27.70 17 68 0
2nd team innings      40    45 17*   4.50   0   0 92 7/50   27.14 6   8 0
                      137   738 53   13.17   0   1 344 8/71   22.81 19 52 0

1st match innings     40    99 23*   7.07   0   0 57 8/108 25.08 5   4 0
                      140 1211 86   18.34   0   5 149 7/56   27.08 5 31 0
2nd match innings     40   203 43   20.30   0   0 49 5/57   29.79 1   4 0
                      140 1009 99   18.01   0   5 192 7/23   28.18 12 37 0
3rd match innings     40    44 17*   5.50   0   0 62 5/56   25.77 4   4 0
                      137   493 53   12.02   0   1 214 6/31   22.86 12 28 0
4th match innings     32     1   1    0.50   0   0 30 7/50   29.96 2   4 0
                      102   245 42   16.33   0   0 130 8/71   22.73 7 24 0

no follow-on        &nb sp; 36   327 43   10.21   0   0 173 8/108 27.20 10 15 0
                      126 2762 99   16.34   0 10 598 8/71   25.96 32 110 0
enforcing a follow-on 4    20 20   10.00   0   0 25 5/75   27.20 2   1 0
                      13   151 50* 21.57   0   1 79 7/23   20.72 4 10 0
in team following on   0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      1    45 45   22.50   0   0   8 4/31   16.62 0   0 0

matches won         &nb sp; 28   210 29   11.66   0   0 156 8/108 22.80 12 10 0
                      87 1634 86   17.02   0   7 487 8/71   22.10 26 81 0
matches drawn          6    64 23* 16.00   0   0 20 4/86   44.15 0   3 0
                      27   661 99   20.65   0   4 96 6/122 36.08 5 23 0
matches lost         &n bsp; 6    73 43    6.08   0   0 22 4/61   43.04 0   3 0
                      26   663 47   13.26   0   0 102 7/56   30.09 5 16 0

won by an innings      7    58 21   29.00   0   0 42 5/56   16.54 4   4 0
                      24   300 74* 20.00   0   1 154 7/23   17.30 8 26 0
won defending target   9    41 17*   4.55   0   0 44 7/50   20.95 3   4 0
                      36   897 86   17.25   0   4 193 8/71   22.34 12 35 0
won chasing target    12   111 29   15.85   0   0 70 8/108 27.71 5   2 0
                      27   437 86   15.06   0   2 140 6/33   27.04 6 20 0
lost by an innings     0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      2    33 13    8.25   0   0   0   -       -    0   1 0
lost defending targ.   2    45 43   11.25   0   0 12 4/61   30.66 0   1 0
                      10   241 42   12.05   0   0 57 7/56   24.26 3   5 0
lost chasing target    4    28 17    3.50   0   0 10 3/84   57.90 0   2 0
                      14   389 47   14.96   0   0 45 5/52   33.08 2 10 0

5 day matches         39   347 43   10.20   0   0 189 8/108 28.06 11 16 0
                      139 2946 99   16.73   0 11 679 8/71   25.36 36 120 0
6 day matches          ; 1     0   0     -     0   0   9 5/43    9.11 1   0 0
                      1    12   7    6.00   0   0   6 3/23   11.83 0   0 0

1st/Only Tests        11    65 21    9.28   0   0 60 8/108 19.11 4   3 0
                      42 1006 86   17.05   0   3 229 8/71   22.51 11 34 0
2nd Tests         & nbsp;   10    75 20* 15.00   0   0 41 5/56   31.04 2   4 0
                      40   723 70   16.43   0   4 221 7/52   22.27 15 37 0
3rd Tests         & nbsp;   11   147 29   13.36   0   0 51 5/75   30.21 2   3 0
                      39   965 99   20.10   0   4 156 6/33   32.26 6 29 0
4th Tests         & nbsp;    5    51 43    8.50   0   0 22 5/152 40.95 1   2 0
                      9    79 45    6.58   0   0 28 4/31   32.64 0   6 0
5th Tests         & nbsp;    3     9   6    1.80   0   0 24 7/50   21.87 3   4 0
                      8    99 30    9.00   0   0 42 7/165 24.61 4 12 0
6th Tests         & nbsp;    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      2    86 37   21.50   0   0   9 3/78   26.33 0   2 0

in series won         32   314 43   14.27   0   0 172 8/108 25.13 12 13 0
                      104 1992 86   16.06   0   8 531 8/71   24.34 27 96 0
in series lost         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   - -
                      21   521 90   15.32   0   1 96 7/52   28.89 7 14 0
in series drawn        8    33 17    2.75   0   0 26 4/86   40.88 0   3 0
                      15   445 99   22.25   0   2 58 7/56   27.53 2 10 0

]]> Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:43:51 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89625#89625 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Macgill can spin it more than... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89531#89531 Author: spin wizard
Subject: 2402
Posted: 05 October 2006 at 11:12pm

Macgill can spin it more than him mate!]]> Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:12:29 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89531#89531 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : That's because there is also... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89223#89223 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2402
Posted: 04 October 2006 at 8:27pm

That's because there is also another human robot called Shane Keith Warne.

I said robot because he turns the ball in such a way that it's almost possible only for a robot.]]> Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:27:49 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89223#89223 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : But he hardly ever plays. http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89212#89212 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2402
Posted: 04 October 2006 at 7:54pm

But he hardly ever plays. ]]> Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:54:31 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=89212#89212 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Originally posted by mAni_paKiif... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85740#85740 Author: dips_december
Subject: 2402
Posted: 22 September 2006 at 5:39am

Originally posted by mAni_paKi

if he can make it to Australian team then his career coulkd long for jus 4 years.I think so

What do you mean by saying he can make it ,macca is already in the aussie test squad .

]]> Fri, 22 Sep 2006 05:39:51 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85740#85740 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : 70 degrees spin, bradman was the... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85629#85629 Author: spin wizard
Subject: 2402
Posted: 21 September 2006 at 8:52pm

70 degrees spin, bradman was the unluckiest according "dravid fan" as he missed that average of 100 because of the duck he got from the mischievious googly.]]> Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:52:06 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85629#85629 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : if he can make it to Australian... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85547#85547 Author: mAni_paKi
Subject: 2402
Posted: 21 September 2006 at 3:41pm

if he can make it to Australian team then his career coulkd long for jus 4 years.I think so]]> Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:41:50 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85547#85547 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : He is 34 or 35 . http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85527#85527 Author: dips_december
Subject: 2402
Posted: 21 September 2006 at 1:57pm

He is 34 or 35 .]]> Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:57:48 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85527#85527 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Never mind he could be the NXe... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85415#85415 Author: mAni_paKi
Subject: 2402
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 9:24pm

Never mind he could be the NXe greatest LEg spinner.Tension not.By the way wats his age?

]]> Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:24:08 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85415#85415 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Why was Don Bradman so unlucky,... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85352#85352 Author: 70_degree_spin
Subject: 2402
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 5:25pm

Why was Don Bradman so unlucky, the famous googly was a jaffa. It wasn't luck or are you talking about something else?]]> Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:25:00 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85352#85352 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : well, going back to 2nd post,... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85250#85250 Author: cheech
Subject: 2402
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 7:57am

well, going back to 2nd post, whenever both leggies (stuey and warney) have played, warney has been performing below average. Im not sure why.

Anyway coming to think of it, ive never seen warney bowl a bad ball, or a BIG wide. only wides he ever bowls was if it doesnt spin out of the rough into stupms from RHB's legstump. Stuey on the other hand... he doesnt bowl so hot in aussie state cricket.
]]> Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:57:41 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85250#85250 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : I can't believe that Aussies... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85082#85082 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2402
Posted: 19 September 2006 at 5:54pm

I can't believe that Aussies have two good leggies and England find it hard to get a below average one.]]> Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:54:10 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=85082#85082 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : The most unlucky cricketer in... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84804#84804 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2402
Posted: 18 September 2006 at 9:59pm

The most unlucky cricketer in the history of cricket followed by Sir Don Bradman.

He is a great bowler and desrves more than what he got from the ACB. Unfortunate to be born in the era of Shane Waren. If he got the chance, you never know, he might have crossed the greatest leg spinner of all time.]]> Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:59:58 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84804#84804 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : in theory i would tend to agree.... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84799#84799 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2402
Posted: 18 September 2006 at 9:55pm

in theory i would tend to agree. Wouldnt Macgill improve as a player too with the very best to observe?]]> Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:55:03 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84799#84799 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Originally posted by TCA123 I... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84547#84547 Author: dips_december
Subject: 2402
Posted: 18 September 2006 at 5:06am

Originally posted by TCA123

I think Australia have missed a trick by not bedding Warne and Macgill into a spin partnership.

Thats what MacGill has always said that if he and warne play tigether it will reduce the pressure of Warne .

]]> Mon, 18 Sep 2006 05:06:14 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84547#84547 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Originally posted by TCA123 like... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84540#84540 Author: Wal Bada
Subject: 2402
Posted: 18 September 2006 at 3:20am

Originally posted by TCA123

�like England?

]]> Mon, 18 Sep 2006 03:20:50 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84540#84540 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : like England? http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84498#84498 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2402
Posted: 17 September 2006 at 9:26pm

like England? ]]> Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:26:31 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84498#84498 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : He isn't as clever as Warne,... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84478#84478 Author: 70_degree_spin
Subject: 2402
Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:48pm

He isn't as clever as Warne, he sort of reminds me of Sami because hetries to get so much spin on the ball like what Sami does with his pace.
However, he is a fantastic bowler and for any other nation would have bagged hundreds more wickets.
]]> Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:48:36 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84478#84478 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : I hear nothing but good things... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84466#84466 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2402
Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:32pm

I hear nothing but good things about Macgill. Is he overrated by Aussies than?]]> Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:32:48 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84466#84466 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Unlike Warne, Mcgill will always... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84452#84452 Author: inzamam329
Subject: 2402
Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:20pm

Unlike Warne, Mcgill will always garauntee you a long hop or a full toss atleast once every over. He is not as consistent as warne in bolwing a tight line and lenth and not giving away freebies to take away the pressure. Bowling 4 or 5 excellent delviries and building the pressure for that over, then suddnly drop one short or a full toss, getting hit for a 4 or six ruins tha hard work for that over.]]> Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:20:09 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84452#84452 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Thanks wal. I think Australia... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84450#84450 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2402
Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:15pm

Thanks wal.

I think Australia have missed a trick by not bedding Warne and Macgill into a spin partnership.

]]> Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:15:28 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84450#84450 Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest : Stuart MacGill Career M - 40,... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84426#84426 Author: Wal Bada
Subject: 2402
Posted: 17 September 2006 at 7:26pm

Stuart MacGill
Career M - 40, W - 198, Avg - 27.2, ER - 3.16, SR - 51.57
India M - 4, W - 14, Avg - 50.78, ER - 3.65, SR - 83.4
Pakistan M - 4, W - 23, Avg - 25.30, ER - 3.33, SR - 45.5
Sri Lanka M - 2, W - 5, Avg - 46.40, ER - 4.19, SR - 66.4

Shane Warne
Career M - 140, W - 685, Avg - 25.25, ER - 2.64, SR - 57.3
India M - 14, W - 43, Avg - 47.18, ER - 3.10, SR - 91.2
Pakistan M - 15, W -90, Avg - 20.17, ER - 2.68, SR - 45.0
Sri Lanka M - 13, W - 59, Avg- 25.54, ER - 2.85, SR - 53.6

Muralitharan
Career M - 108, W - 657, Avg - 21.96, ER - 2.39, SR - 55.0
India M - 15, W - 67, Avg - 32.47, ER - 2.73, SR - 71.2
Pakistan M - 14, W - 79, Avg - 23.31, ER - 2.58, SR - 54.1
Australia M - 11, W - 55, Avg - 31.41, ER - 3.03, SR - 62.1

This shows few important facts

Indians play spin well.

Pakistanis are notoriously weak against spin

Warne has better stats in sub-continent than MacGill

MacGill has become less effective because of his expensiveness

Murali has bowled better to Indians than lot of other spinners

This is the reason why I am not calling MacGill a legend like Warne

Edited by Wal Bada]]> Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:26:28 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2402&PID=84426#84426