Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Symonds Vs Flintoff http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Cricket World Ratings : Symonds Vs Flintoff Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sat, 18 May 2013 18:38:52 +0000 Tue, 23 May 2006 09:09:26 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.71 360 www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1304 Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_images/logo.png http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ Symonds Vs Flintoff : Many Aussies must be all that... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53689#53689 Author: mazzybabe.uk
Subject: 1304
Posted: 23 May 2006 at 9:09am

Many Aussies must be all that sun]]> Tue, 23 May 2006 09:09:26 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53689#53689 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by mazzybabe.ukThen... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53667#53667 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1304
Posted: 23 May 2006 at 7:06am

Originally posted by mazzybabe.uk

Then you have 46 chromosones like most people


I suspect some on this forum have 47 mate !!]]> Tue, 23 May 2006 07:06:04 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53667#53667 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by cricket_mstrI'd... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53664#53664 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1304
Posted: 23 May 2006 at 7:03am

Originally posted by cricket_mstr

I'd say Symonds would be better with his ability to destruct high and low class teams



Forgiving your grammar lad , but it strikes me that Symonds and Wendel Sailor are two of a kind - they're fantastic at the destruction of high and low class bars!]]> Tue, 23 May 2006 07:03:48 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53664#53664 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Then you have 46 chromosones like... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53499#53499 Author: mazzybabe.uk
Subject: 1304
Posted: 22 May 2006 at 3:29pm

Then you have 46 chromosones like most people]]> Mon, 22 May 2006 15:29:21 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53499#53499 Symonds Vs Flintoff : hey hey, don't knock hoggy... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53265#53265 Author: Clapo
Subject: 1304
Posted: 21 May 2006 at 2:16pm

hey hey, don't knock hoggy , he's a legend that guy, and he's by far a better bowler than andrew symonds, and a bowler i think is hugely underrated.

But the fact that his bowling competes with clarke is exactly true, he spins it even less than gilo  (jks skip )

]]> Sun, 21 May 2006 14:16:21 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53265#53265 Symonds Vs Flintoff : The fact he said Symonds bowling... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53257#53257 Author: Clobber
Subject: 1304
Posted: 21 May 2006 at 2:02pm

The fact he said Symonds bowling has to try and compete with that ofHogg and Clarke tells you all you need to know about him as an allrounder]]> Sun, 21 May 2006 14:02:35 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53257#53257 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Rubbish! Come on mate there is... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53236#53236 Author: mazzybabe.uk
Subject: 1304
Posted: 21 May 2006 at 1:25pm

Rubbish! Come on mate there is no way that flintoff is the stand out batsmen in the england side. Same with the bowling he was a stand out performer in the ashes but when everyone in the bowling attacks on song then he starts to sink into the background ]]> Sun, 21 May 2006 13:25:28 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53236#53236 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Flintoff is the stand out player... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53221#53221 Author: cricket_mstr
Subject: 1304
Posted: 21 May 2006 at 11:51am

Flintoff is the stand out player of England, Symonds has to match his batting with Ponting, Gilly, Clarke and Hussey and his bowling with Hogg and Clarke.

Its only when the Aussies are in trouble that Symonds steps up his game to this higher level. I've seen Symonds in both batting and bowling step up and do his part when his sides in trouble.

]]> Sun, 21 May 2006 11:51:07 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53221#53221 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by cricket_mstr The... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53202#53202 Author: mazzybabe.uk
Subject: 1304
Posted: 21 May 2006 at 11:19am

Originally posted by cricket_mstr

The only reason why you think Flintoff is good is because he was the only English batsman who actually scored runs .

Yeah after KP,Tresco,Strauss

]]> Sun, 21 May 2006 11:19:46 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53202#53202 Symonds Vs Flintoff : I know watching Symonds go out... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53182#53182 Author: cricket_mstr
Subject: 1304
Posted: 21 May 2006 at 10:29am

I know watching Symonds go out to bat in an ODI match I instantly feel the other team is in trouble, because Symonds is a powerhouse of a hitter.

I'd say Symonds would be better with his ability to destruct high and low class teams

 



Edited by cricket_mstr]]> Sun, 21 May 2006 10:29:50 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=53182#53182 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Ive never seen Symonds play as... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=52898#52898 Author: Fergie
Subject: 1304
Posted: 19 May 2006 at 2:40pm

Ive never seen Symonds play as he got drunk the night before the game in bristol and was not alowed to play as a punishment

but I reacon Freddie is definatly the better player, he is the nucleus of this susefull england teem, the best england bowler and he has showed that he can bat sensibly and build an innings.

I dont think Symonds can be considerd Auz's best bowler or as good a batsman as Freddie.

Allso last sumer before the ashes the australians said that they would like to have Freddie in their teem. I dont think England would want Symonds

Freddie allso wates till the game is over to get pised
]]> Fri, 19 May 2006 14:40:57 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=52898#52898 Symonds Vs Flintoff : yer good point clobber, i like... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38696#38696 Author: henjam
Subject: 1304
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 9:25am

yer good point clobber, i like pollock i think he is a quality player, and yes his statistics back this up, but a key part to these allrounders we are discussing here is what impact they have on cricket matches, pollock hits his 30s and picks up a couple of wickets, keeping his statistics in tack, but the ability of symonds and freddy to change games in an hours play and put the momentum with their country is a massive contribution, hitting a quick fire 60/70, taking a great catch and run out, and having a great spell with the ball is performances you get with these two.]]> Thu, 06 Apr 2006 09:25:58 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38696#38696 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by SuperbokkieCurrently... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38691#38691 Author: Clobber
Subject: 1304
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 8:41am

Originally posted by Superbokkie

Currently Shaun Pollock holds the world numberone All=rounders tag. He is the number one bowler (way better thanSymonds and certainly has a better economy and average than Freddie),and a top slogger for South Africa lately with several blazing 50sagainst Australia.

SO this poll is blatantly biased towards Freddie and that mangy haired Aussie yob!



Only in that daft ratings system. You can't seriously be telling methat a clapped out slow medium bowler who occasionally flogs a quick 30is the finest all-rounder in the game?
]]> Thu, 06 Apr 2006 08:41:38 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38691#38691 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by SuperbokkieSO... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38651#38651 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1304
Posted: 06 April 2006 at 6:24am

Originally posted by Superbokkie

SO this poll is blatantly biased towards Freddie and that mangy haired Aussie yob!



No prizes for which of the two you prefer then Bokkie!!]]> Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:24:34 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38651#38651 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Currently Shaun Pollock holds... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38628#38628 Author: Superbokkie
Subject: 1304
Posted: 05 April 2006 at 10:17pm

Currently Shaun Pollock holds the world number one All=rounders tag. He is the number one bowler (way better than Symonds and certainly has a better economy and average than Freddie), and a top slogger for South Africa lately with several blazing 50s against Australia.

SO this poll is blatantly biased towards Freddie and that mangy haired Aussie yob!

]]> Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:17:37 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38628#38628 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by cricket_mstr Youguys... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38600#38600 Author: henjam
Subject: 1304
Posted: 05 April 2006 at 4:11pm

Originally posted by cricket_mstr

You guys appear so goodly eyed towards Flintoff

How can you say I should Flintoff is a good player when I obviously see Smonds as better. Stop being so one eyed and think of it from another angle. The only reason why you think Flintoff is good is because he was the only English batsman who actually scored runs .

Note kevin pitersen was are leading run scorer for england and the whole of the series

But yer no question, freddy is better than roy

]]> Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:11:57 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38600#38600 Symonds Vs Flintoff : andrew symonds is a useless bowler.... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38599#38599 Author: jwp266
Subject: 1304
Posted: 05 April 2006 at 3:36pm

andrew symonds is a useless bowler. i think freddie by quite a bit.]]> Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:36:42 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=38599#38599 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by ClobberI... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37443#37443 Author: cricket_mstr
Subject: 1304
Posted: 31 March 2006 at 10:15am

Originally posted by Clobber

I better start preparing my "why I don't like Kallis" jibes in readiness for the inevitable thread 

And I better start my preperations "why I love Kallis"

]]> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:15:19 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37443#37443 Symonds Vs Flintoff : I better start preparing my "why... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37437#37437 Author: Clobber
Subject: 1304
Posted: 31 March 2006 at 9:57am

I better start preparing my "why I don't like Kallis" jibes in readiness for the inevitable thread ]]> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:57:19 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37437#37437 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by cricket_mstrOne... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37435#37435 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1304
Posted: 31 March 2006 at 9:54am

Originally posted by cricket_mstr

One player who is definetly can be considered better is Kallis


And maybe that should be the real debate




Not here it won't - read the thread heading.]]> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:54:42 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37435#37435 Symonds Vs Flintoff : One player who is definetly can... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37427#37427 Author: cricket_mstr
Subject: 1304
Posted: 31 March 2006 at 9:33am

One player who is definetly can be considered better is Kallis

And maybe that should be the real debate

 

]]> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:33:24 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37427#37427 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Originally posted by cricket_mstrThe... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37412#37412 Author: Clobber
Subject: 1304
Posted: 31 March 2006 at 9:16am

Originally posted by cricket_mstr

The only reason why you think Flintoff is good is because he was the only English batsman who actually scored runs .



oh sweet jesus.

I think from now on the standard approach to anything cricket_mstrposts should be to smile and nod your head sympathetically, then simplymove on
]]> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:16:17 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37412#37412 Symonds Vs Flintoff : I dunno Claps , maybe Flintoff... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37338#37338 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1304
Posted: 31 March 2006 at 5:56am

I dunno Claps , maybe Flintoff IS overrated!! ]]> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 05:56:39 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37338#37338 Symonds Vs Flintoff : how can you argue against such... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37328#37328 Author: Clapo
Subject: 1304
Posted: 31 March 2006 at 3:59am

how can you argue against such a fantastic debater, perhaps we'd better give up now sledg and clobbs ??

Cricket_Mstr no matter how many angles i look at it, or how many eyes i look at it with, i always come up with the same answer.. Flintoff is simply the more complete player... i can see that and i'm Australian...  (dunno if i like to admit that at times when i see that your location is Australia though)

Neither of us is saying that symonds is no good, theres no doubt that he is, Flintoff is just better and his record proves that.

]]> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 03:59:32 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37328#37328 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Youguys appear so goodly eyed... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37327#37327 Author: cricket_mstr
Subject: 1304
Posted: 31 March 2006 at 3:39am

You guys appear so goodly eyed towards Flintoff

How can you say I should Flintoff is a good player when I obviously see Smonds as better. Stop being so one eyed and think of it from another angle. The only reason why you think Flintoff is good is because he was the only English batsman who actually scored runs .



Edited by cricket_mstr]]> Fri, 31 Mar 2006 03:39:46 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37327#37327 Symonds Vs Flintoff : *sighs and rolls eyes* http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37315#37315 Author: Clapo
Subject: 1304
Posted: 30 March 2006 at 11:10pm

*sighs and rolls eyes*

 

]]> Thu, 30 Mar 2006 23:10:39 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37315#37315 Symonds Vs Flintoff : No problem Macca , that's... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37272#37272 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1304
Posted: 30 March 2006 at 2:17pm

No problem Macca , that's what a forum's about , good old fashioned debate!

I didn't get mad either , I thoroughly enjoyed myself.

I look forward to some more fencing in the future.

Edited by Sledger]]> Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:17:35 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37272#37272 Symonds Vs Flintoff : yer but i never said you called... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37269#37269 Author: RISE_OF_MACCA
Subject: 1304
Posted: 30 March 2006 at 2:08pm

yer but i never said you called symond useless in this topic, i was origiginally directing it at some other posters untill you went into bat for them and it ended up back firing on you. OK  now listen untill anyone on this forum play's internattional cricket agaisn't these players thats when they can start calling them useless. OK sorry if ive got you annoyed but im allowed my opinion and its a good one as ive been told by former test cricketer Tim Zoehrer who was the one that told me this.

ITS fine if your saying flintoffs better i agree with you and the good thing is that isn't calling anyone useless it it?

 

]]> Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:08:26 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37269#37269 Symonds Vs Flintoff : Macca , READ your quote in my... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37266#37266 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1304
Posted: 30 March 2006 at 2:03pm

Macca , READ your quote in my previous post on this topic , it specifically says "YOU". That means ME to me....

Now I'm busy , can't you go practice using a knife and fork and let me get on with some work?

]]> Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:03:17 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37266#37266 Symonds Vs Flintoff : ok now ill go to words so u can... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37265#37265 Author: RISE_OF_MACCA
Subject: 1304
Posted: 30 March 2006 at 1:56pm

ok now ill go to words so u can understand.... did i ever say you did??? no i didn't i said people shouldnt be. If you look you will see i said flintoff is better because of his quality bowling so i don't know where your coming from. ]]> Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:56:05 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1304&PID=37265#37265