Better leggie

where have the 4 votes for mcgill come from?

and my answrr is warne, is there any competition at all?

yeah right crownmethod (sarcastic). how come macgill got 8 wickets in fatullah if he can only play on SCG (his initials are SCG macgill). the only reason warne is over him is because he is more economical you can really say. How can you all say mcgill isn't good. mcgill average is better (27 while warne is 28), strike rate is better as well. macgill averages a wicket every 8 and a half overs while warne is about 10 overs. i am sure mcgill rip it more than warne as well. Both are very good but warne is a little better.

Macgill does well on pitches that warne has struggled on in the past. You can all disagree and hate me but i don't care. you can say when he is in tandem with warne he is up for the challenge and wins it.

Anyway, warne is my cricket idle. I love watching him.

Is MacGill older he's something like 35 so is Warne

Macgill would get into any other test side in the world- but warne is keeping him out of the aussie side.

You can't say if they both had played the same amount of tests macgill would have come out better, because he might not have had the consistency that warne has had throughout his career- there is no way to tell.

Plus macgill has not got the persona and presence that warne does.. people play the man rather than the ball and this is partly why warne has had so much success.

Macgill plays the role of quiet achiever- much like Paul Collingwood compared to kevin pietersen, Collingwood is much better technically but isn't noticed except when he plays poorly-Pietersen is always noticed because he talks himself up and has a strong media related personality- in Pakistan and India Collingwood outplayed Pietersen consistently but no-one really noticed!