Brett Lee’s Fastest Ball |
Post Reply 
|
Page <12 |
| Author |
 Share Topic Printable Version Delicious Digg Facebook Furl Google Boomarks Google Buzz MySpace Newsvine reddit StumbleUpon Translate Twitter Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks Topic Search  Topic Options
|
||
saadadvanced7 
Banned 
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
 Post Options
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Brett Lee’s Fastest BallPosted: 30 December 2005 at 7:29pm |
||
|
Guess what everybody. I just went to the Guiness World record book site and gave them these links. I said that the Shoaib Akhtar delivery wasn't the fastest ever but the Sami one was. I hope they will put the Sami delivery in the 2007 World record book.
|
|||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
|||
 |
|||
|
Big Josh
Test Debutant 
Joined: 02 December 2005 Location: Zimbabwe Posts: 125 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 January 2006 at 9:08pm |
||
|
So what was the fastest delivery???
|
|||
|
josh
|
|||
|
|||
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 January 2006 at 10:28pm |
||
|
According to the 2006 Guinness World Record Book, it's Shoaib's delivery, which was delivered at 100.24 mph. According to some of the Australian folks on this forum, it was Lee's delivery, which was delivered at 161.8 kph (faster than Shoaib's), and according to a video I watched, it was Sami's delivery which was delivered at 164 kph (faster than both Shoaib's and Lee's).
|
|||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Goughy101
12th Man
Joined: 02 January 2006 Posts: 1 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 January 2006 at 1:11am |
||
|
Lets clear things up. The Sami delivery is irrelevant, as is the 161.8 kph ball by Lee (both due to tech problems.) "A delivery by Brett Lee from Australia was timed at 161.8kph against the West Indies at Brisbane on November 23, 2000. However this has been put down to an erroneous recording due to external interference of the radar's signal. Two back-up radars recorded the correct speed of 142kph for the delivery." Cricinfo The fastest ball ever is by Shoaib at 161.3 (100.2 mph) and the second fastest is by Brett Lee at 160.7 (99.8 mph- v. close) Its all rubbish really as different machines give different readings, there is variable accuracy and most importantly the speed is just for the fastest a ball has travelled through the air. Certain bowlers loose less speed on bouncing/pitching the ball and can therefore make the ball reach the batsman quicker than a bowler with a higher speed reading.
|
|||
|
|||
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 January 2006 at 1:57am |
||
|
Ha, so I was right the first time. I said Shoaib delivered the fastest ball.
|
|||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Charlie
Short Leg 
Joined: 29 October 2005 Posts: 202 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2006 at 10:36am |
||
|
i reckon brett lee did bowl the bowl that fast....
Edited by Charlie |
|||
|
|||
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2006 at 10:10pm |
||
|
he did not
|
|||
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|||
|
|||
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2006 at 11:09pm |
||
|
I agree, He didn't bowl that ball. It has already been explained earlier why Lee didn't deliver that ball.
|
|||
|
|||
|
prayas
Short Leg
Joined: 15 January 2006 Location: United States Posts: 312 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 January 2006 at 2:59am |
||
|
do u know why?????????? |
|||
|
eat cricket,sleep cricket, dream cricket,play cricket,.,,,,,,,,,,,
|
|||
|
|||
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 January 2006 at 8:13am |
||
|
This is why:
"A delivery by Brett Lee from Australia was timed at 161.8kph against the West Indies at Brisbane on November 23, 2000. However this has been put down to an erroneous recording due to external interference of the radar's signal. Two back-up radars recorded the correct speed of 142kph for the delivery." Cricinfo |
|||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Black_cap_95
3rd Man
Joined: 15 December 2005 Location: New Zealand Posts: 228 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2006 at 5:51am |
||
|
bret lee was bowling quick in n.z a year ago he bowledv one at 160.8 i think
|
|||
|
go hard or go home
|
|||
|
|||
|
shan
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 30 December 2005 Location: Pakistan Posts: 1324 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2006 at 7:02am |
||
|
Well people are doing well to clear the things up. But forget about fractions, because they do not really matter. All speed guns are different, and there is always a chance of a fractional deviation. One thing that really matters is that both Shoaib & Lee can bowl almost 160 Km/h, which is really a termendous pace, and they really add passion to this game of cricket. |
|||
|
"Excellence is something we can reach for; perfection is God's business."
|
|||
|
|||
|
MiNiWaRnEy
Banned
Ricky Ponting for PM Joined: 14 December 2005 Posts: 2395 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2006 at 5:29am |
||
|
Dead rioght I agree, they are both great for the game and can get it over 160 kph.
|
|||
|
|||
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 February 2006 at 12:09am |
||
|
Yup!
And I hope there will be no more arguements over who is faster. |
|||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Howzat16
12th Man
Joined: 02 June 2007 Location: England Posts: 14 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 June 2007 at 9:44pm |
||
|
To me speed doesn't really matter to be honest. I mean take a look at Glenn McGrath who was quite quick in his younger days well as he got older he lost some of his pace but he was still taking wickets whether he was bowling 80 mph or lower or maybe, he was still taking wickets. It doesn't matter how fast you are if you're getting tanked all round the ground and not taking wickets does it?
|
|||
|
|||
|
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007 Location: New Zealand Posts: 2139 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 June 2007 at 11:27pm |
||
You are exactly right!!! Ive said it before, and you have just reinforced my point. These guys rambling on about the fastest ball are just wasting their time!! Arggghhhhh
|
|||
|
Warriors!!
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bettis91
Short Leg
Joined: 26 May 2007 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 63 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 June 2007 at 8:52pm |
||
I fort that Akhtar got the fastest bowl and dead on 100mph
|
|||
|
Let's Get Down To Business
|
|||
|
|||
|
gilchurch
Short Leg
Joined: 19 June 2007 Posts: 59 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 June 2007 at 12:18am |
||
|
i think brett lee hit 160 km against south africe in 2006 in south africa.
|
|||
|
tonk it for 6
|
|||
|
|||
|
spin wizard
Opening Bowler
The world’s next great spinner Joined: 21 January 2006 Location: Saint Vincent Posts: 9453 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 June 2007 at 9:42pm |
||
|
Interesting stats that Bettis91. Now, this tape here says otherwise about Thompson and Roberts..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPDW7hj1yfs
|
|||
|
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
|
|||
|
|||
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
