Forum Home Forum Home » The Archives » Archived Match Threads
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: ODI Tri-Series - Bangladesh,India,Sri Lan
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Forum LockedODI Tri-Series - Bangladesh,India,Sri Lan

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Message
sam_ahmed View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Posts: 4363
Direct Link To This Post Topic: ODI Tri-Series - Bangladesh,India,Sri Lan
    Posted: 10 January 2010 at 5:01pm
Originally posted by MalhotraRaj84

Originally posted by sam_ahmed

Good recovery by Lanka to get to 214... still IND should win this easily... Just a food for thought for Raj, IND allowed SLN to get to 213 despite having them reeling at 84/6.
I was about to post that exactly. Bad bad bad bowling. How could they allow them to score 214.
 
Such lapse aginst Aus and SA can be costly.


Bad bowling is not the point here... as per your logic Raj, you'll have to call India's bowling as Pathetic because they allowed Randiv and Thushara to score runs despite getting top order batsmen out... exactly like how you called PAK;s bowling as pathetic as they allowed Hussey and Siddle to score runs (wonder how Hussey will feel if he reads this).

... and then you say you are not biased?

... Also I'm writing this for the sake of argument... I personally don't mean to say that IND's bowling is pathetic... but I do consider them to be weak as compared to that of some other nations.


Edited by sam_ahmed - 10 January 2010 at 5:03pm
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 January 2010 at 5:16pm
Originally posted by MalhotraRaj84

Mighty (Karthik,Gambhir and Kholi) vs good SL Bowlers;
Weak (Dilshan,Tharanga,Jayawerdene,Sangakara,Samaraweera,Kadamby) vs Pathetic Indian Bowlers.
 
Indian bowlers are really pathetic in comparison to SL bowlers, because SL bowlers were bowling to a Mightly line up while Indian bowlers were bowling to a Weak batting lineup.
The above post was clearly 2 hrs before your post sam.
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 January 2010 at 6:06pm
Originally posted by sam_ahmed


... and then you say you are not biased?

... I personally don't mean to say that IND's bowling is pathetic... but I do consider them to be weak as compared to that of some other nations.
 
You love logic right sam , here you go with some...

You had posted that Pakistani bowling must be happy because they bowled Aussies twice in their own den. You also said some of Indian bowlers are not even half as good as Pakistani bowlers.
 
2007-08 series, India tour Australia
Weak (Jaques,Hayden,in form uninjured Ponting,Symonds,Gilchrist) vs Pathetic Indian bowling attack.
 
Results- 2-1 in favour of Australia , No UDRS
 
2009-10 series, Pakistan tour of Australia
Mighty ( Watson,Hughes/katich,out of form injured Ponting,North,Haddin) vs  Mighty Pakistan bowling attack.
 
Result - 2-0 trailling , UDRS available
 
I don't know who is biased , decide for yourselves.


Edited by MalhotraRaj84 - 10 January 2010 at 6:08pm
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
sam_ahmed View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Posts: 4363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2010 at 3:50am

Understand this Raj, IND had their batsmen to score the runs, PAK didn't. when did India got bowled out for 139 chasing 176? It's not a question of poor bowling at all, their batting just can't stand up and deliver. You can't expect their bowlers to bowl AUS out for 50 in every innings.

If IND had got out for scores of 258, 251, 333 139, had they won even a single game?
 
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
Back to Top
zuhair_abbasi View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 6202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2010 at 5:21am
Raj matey - its the bowling which is in question and clearly Pakistan has the edge there - you can go and have a detailed analysis of runs per wicket, strike rates and what not and you will have the answer. Pakistan lost because of inept batting - not bowling.
http://thecricketinsight.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
bladescape View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar
Excellence in the making

Joined: 14 June 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1809
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2010 at 8:12am
Originally posted by MalhotraRaj84

Originally posted by sam_ahmed

... and then you say you are not biased?
... I personally don't mean to say that IND's bowling is pathetic... but I do consider them to be weak as compared to that of some other nations.

 

You love logic right sam , here you go with some...

You had posted that Pakistani bowling must be happy because they bowled Aussies twice in their own den. You also said some of Indian bowlers are not even half as good as Pakistani bowlers.

 

2007-08 series, India tour Australia

Weak (Jaques,Hayden,in form uninjured Ponting,Symonds,Gilchrist) vs Pathetic Indian bowling attack.

 

Results- 2-1 in favour of Australia , No UDRS

 

2009-10 series, Pakistan tour of Australia

Mighty ( Watson,Hughes/katich,out of form injured Ponting,North,Haddin) vs  Mighty Pakistan bowling attack.

 

Result - 2-0 trailling , UDRS available

 

I don't know who is biased , decide for yourselves.


Check the batting/bowling the other way...
You know, I'm trying to decide whether to change my siggy or not...
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2010 at 8:48am
Originally posted by bladescape

Check the batting/bowling the other way...
Indian batting faced Lee,Jhonson,Clarke and Hogg compared to Siddle,Jhonson,Bollinger and Hauritz.
 
So if Indian batting was strong , then they faced much better bowling attack.Right bladey!
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
mystery View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 15 January 2008
Posts: 2140
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2010 at 10:22am
I dont see much different between two bowling attack you are showing.
Rohit Sharma - What the world has seen is gear 1, gear speed 2,3,4,5,7,8,9 to be witnessed in IPL only.   
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2010 at 11:29am
Then why were so many cribbing that Aussies were second string when they toured India for ODI series?
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
sam_ahmed View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Posts: 4363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2010 at 6:31pm
Kohli is in terrific form... hits another ton!!! Poor guy will have to make way when Sachin and Sehwag return... Such is the strength of India's batting!!! These are dangerous signs for other teams with the WC in the subcontinent... 
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
Back to Top
DRAVID FAN View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 3635
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 January 2010 at 8:43pm
Originally posted by MalhotraRaj84

Then why were so many cribbing that Aussies were second string when they toured India for ODI series?


The batting was and players were injured everyday so inexperienced players and unprepared players landed in India withing 20 hours of an injury so technically, they were a second string team. The matches were also extremely close. 1 different ball and India would have won the series but still can't take credit away from Aussies. Plus its the Indian team. If they were unpredictable when Sachin, Dravid, Ganguly, Sehwag and Azharuddin were on top of their game, they can obviously be unpredictable with players like Gambhir, Dhoni, Kohli, Yuvraj all of who are no way near the 5 mentioned earlier yet.
Back to Top
sam_ahmed View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Posts: 4363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 3:55am
I think it's more the attitude now that has changed and the approach towards the game... no wonder Rahul, Ganguly, Azhar, Sachin were better players but at that time IND lacked that killer instinct... they were unbeatable at home but were pathetic abroad. The younger players may not be as classy as those but they have that fearless attitude and have adapted to modern cricket very quickly. However, will they be able to do it in the longer version of the game (after Sachin, Dravid and VVS depart) is a different story. I still don't think Yuvi is the right replacement for Ganguly... we had already seen that on the tour to Australia.
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
Back to Top
bladescape View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar
Excellence in the making

Joined: 14 June 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1809
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 3:59am
Originally posted by MalhotraRaj84

Originally posted by bladescape

Check the batting/bowling the other way...
Indian batting faced Lee,Jhonson,Clarke and Hogg compared to Siddle,Jhonson,Bollinger and Hauritz.
 

So if Indian batting was strong , then they faced much better bowling attack.Right bladey!


Clark and Lee were in quite good form at that time and Hogg always outmatched Hauritz in my mind!
You know, I'm trying to decide whether to change my siggy or not...
Back to Top
zuhair_abbasi View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 6202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 9:30am
Was going through the statsguru and performed the simple analysis if Indian bowling in the recently passed decade. Indians among all test playing nations have leaked most runs per wicket and they exceed the average by 5 runs. Therir RPO is also higher than any other side and beats the average by a good 8 percent. Even against the Bangladesh, their bowlers have performed the worst among all test playing nations averaging 5 runs more for every wicket and leaking 10 percent more runs per over. this should settle the debate of the inept Indian bowling, which makes me believe that they can't stay on top for a longer period. It is their batting which as saved their grace for such a long period.
http://thecricketinsight.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
sam_ahmed View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Posts: 4363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 10:30am
India's batting is not just good but too good Zuhair... It's like challenging... saying "get our 20 wickets if you can". Poor performance of the bowlers goes completely unnoticed... even Youraj and Raina and Sehwag pick up wickets because the opposition is always under pressure, thanks to the huge scores that India's batting puts up and that too in quick time.

Edited by sam_ahmed - 12 January 2010 at 10:32am
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
Back to Top
zuhair_abbasi View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 6202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 10:55am
Agree completely. we all know India's batting is still the finest and has shielded their bowlers all these years.
http://thecricketinsight.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
spin wizard View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
The world’s next great spinner

Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Posts: 9453
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 2:00pm
Yep, the Indian batting is strong and got depth.  Such a line-up of Sehwag, Dravid, Tendulkar, Laxman, Ganguly should have been winning much more than they did, only because they didn't have quality seamers to help them overseas.
 
Poor Kohli though, after being inform, he'll have to take the bench the next series when the 2 meastro returns.
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 6:09pm

India in last 5 years(bowling records)
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/team/6.html?class=1;spanmax1=31+Dec+2009;spanmin1=01+Jan+2005;spanval1=span;team_view=bowl;template=results;type=team
-------------     Span Mat Won  Lost Tied  Draw  W/L  Ave     RPO   HS    LS
filtered 2005-2009 51   20    10      0     21      2.00  35.79  3.33  760  84

Pakistan in last 5 years(bowling records)
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/team/7.html?class=1;spanmax1=31+Dec+2009;spanmin1=01+Jan+2005;spanval1=span;team_view=bowl;template=results;type=team
-------------     Span Mat Won Lost Tied Draw  W/L   Ave     RPO   HS    LS
filtered 2005-2009 38   10    14    0     14       0.71  38.79  3.50  644  73

The filter critera of Ave is Average per wicket,I will post last 10 years also Zuhair if you wish.
 
I have also provided the quiery URL, let me know if there are errors.
 
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 6:19pm
Originally posted by zuhair_abbasi

Was going through the statsguru and performed the simple analysis if Indian bowling in the recently passed decade. Indians among all test playing nations have leaked most runs per wicket and they exceed the average by 5 runs. Therir RPO is also higher than any other side and beats the average by a good 8 percent. Even against the Bangladesh, their bowlers have performed the worst among all test playing nations averaging 5 runs more for every wicket and leaking 10 percent more runs per over. this should settle the debate of the inept Indian bowling, which makes me believe that they can't stay on top for a longer period. It is their batting which as saved their grace for such a long period.
Probably you selected "batting records" radiobutton,thats why you are getting both RPO and Average/wicket more Smile.

1 Jan 2000 to 31 Dec 2009-> Last Decade figures
Pakistan
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/team/7.html?class=1;spanmax1=31+Dec+2009;spanmin1=01+Jan+2000;spanval1=span;team_view=bowl;template=results;type=team
------------- Span     Mat Won Lost Tied   Draw  W/L   Ave     RPO   HS   LS
filtered 2000-2009 83    30     31    0       22    0.96  34.69  3.29  675  73

India
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/team/6.html?class=1;spanmax1=31+Dec+2009;spanmin1=01+Jan+2000;spanval1=span;team_view=bowl;template=results;type=team
------------- Span       Mat  Won  Lost Tied Draw   W/L   Ave     RPO   HS   LS
filtered 2000-2009  103      40   27     0     36     1.48  35.49  3.22   760 84

and yes , let me know if I am wrong.
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
mystery View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 15 January 2008
Posts: 2140
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 7:12pm

Its becuz it is showing against all teams and most people know this Indian bowling lineup is too weak even Ian Chappell is saying that same thing everyone cant be wrong stop trying to proof everyone wrong mate only Khan is a good bowler otherwise all other currently are very ordinary bowlers.



Edited by mystery - 12 January 2010 at 7:13pm
Rohit Sharma - What the world has seen is gear 1, gear speed 2,3,4,5,7,8,9 to be witnessed in IPL only.   
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2010 at 7:27pm

Mate look at the statistics that I have provided. You guys were saying Pakistan bowling attack is much better than India's. Now look at the RPO and Avg/Wicket leaked by Pakistan in last 5 years, both are clearly more than Indian bowlers.

Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
zuhair_abbasi View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 6202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 5:34am
Hold on Raj!!!! Did I not mention one day record? My fault if I did not. this is a one day series thread so I performed it for one games excluding Zim and BD!!! Go have a look yourself too matey.
http://thecricketinsight.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 6:11am
Originally posted by zuhair_abbasi

Hold on Raj!!!! Did I not mention one day record? My fault if I did not. this is a one day series thread so I performed it for one games excluding Zim and BD!!! Go have a look yourself too matey.
Will get back on that too at leisure.Mover over in ODI's Team A scores 300 for 10 means in 50 overs, Team B scores 200 for 4 in 50 overs
 
Now Team A's Avg pre wicket bowling figures is 50 runs per wicket
Now Team B's Avg pre wicket bowling figures is 30 runs per wicket
 
Now according to stats Team B's bowling figures look good.Do you think in ODI's calculating Average per wicket really works out? Yes RPO is fine (to some extent) in ODI's 
 
In any case I will get back with ODI statistics.Atleast now it is clear that in Tests Indian's bowling is much better than what people perceive.
 
P.S: Its ok , you mentioned Test playing nation and Top spot(we are in top spot in Test, not it ODI - You may be right by end of day in ODI's too if we win the Tri-series today)


Edited by MalhotraRaj84 - 13 January 2010 at 6:23am
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
sam_ahmed View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Posts: 4363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 6:31am
As per that logic, calculating RPO for tests doesn't make sense.
 
Average per wicket is never an indication of how good the bowling is... obviously IND's avg per wicket will be fair because they have been taking 20 wickets and that is why they are winning matches. What is it that makes it possible for them to take 20 wickets is they key here.
 
secondly it is the current bowling attack that we are talking about... there have been times when Kumble, Srinath and even Pathan have got loads of wickets in a series... PAK have hardly played with their first choice bowling attack, either due to cotroversy or due to Injuries...
 
Finally, IND are a brilliant team, nobody is denying that... their weak link is their bowling which will be brutally exposed if the batting becomes weaker (may be when Sachin, VVS and Dravid retire) IND do have very good and talented young batters who should be able to do well but as of now we cannot say that they are in the same league as the above three and hence they'll need the bowlers to be good and effective for IND to win games... because the bowlers then will not have the luxury of 550-600 + runs and attacking fields every time they bowl!
 


Edited by sam_ahmed - 13 January 2010 at 6:32am
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
Back to Top
zuhair_abbasi View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 6202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 6:34am
couldn't agree more.
http://thecricketinsight.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 6:43am
I will explain why it makes sense in Test and why not in ODI's. In leisure, have patience.
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
zuhair_abbasi View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 6202
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 7:42am
Sanga wins the toss, puts India into bat. So the final has been decided - right? Let's go to sleep for 6 hours and watch the presentation ceremony.
http://thecricketinsight.blogspot.com/
Back to Top
MalhotraRaj84 View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2009
Location: India1
Posts: 2204
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 7:49am
Originally posted by zuhair_abbasi

Sanga wins the toss, puts India into bat. So the final has been decided - right? Let's go to sleep for 6 hours and watch the presentation ceremony.
Now if they are worth what they are , they should win this.
EDIT : I mean India

Edited by MalhotraRaj84 - 13 January 2010 at 7:49am
Race to No 1 again ... started!
Back to Top
kahmad View Drop Down
First Slip
First Slip
Avatar

Joined: 21 May 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 8:57am
they are indeed
Edit: i mean Sri Lanka


Edited by kahmad - 13 January 2010 at 8:57am
Back to Top
sam_ahmed View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Posts: 4363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2010 at 9:02am
63/5 ... it has been perhaps the worst tri-series I have ever seen, win the toss and win the game... how can the ICC allow such events?
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.758 seconds.