|
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
| Author | |
Tailender
12th Man
Joined: 13 February 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 38 |
Topic: Sri Lanka’sTour Of New ZealandPosted: 06 April 2005 at 2:12pm |
|
A draw certainly looks the most likely result here, but New Zealand will have to make a decent second-innings score to make the match safe, something they haven't always been able to do of late.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 06 April 2005 at 3:01pm |
|
No i don't think there's anyway of getting a result here. Even if the rest of the Sri Lankan innings is skittled New Zealand will have to score very heavily and very quickly in their second innings which is unlikely without Astle and now with Cairns gone. Also Flemming's form is iffy and Atapattu and Jayasuriya would have enough experience if they had to when opening the batting in the second innings to leave alone everything outside Off stump and to block away everything that was required. You can really tell that Muralitharan and Shane Bond are missing.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tailender
12th Man
Joined: 13 February 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 38 |
Posted: 07 April 2005 at 1:45am |
|
Sri Lanka 453-5 at lunch on Day 4. I agree with you that New Zealand can't win, but if Sri Lanka bat for the rest of the day they could get a lead of 100 or so and then New Zealand will have to bat sensibly for two sessions to make the match safe. That shouldn't be a problem unless the pitch really starts giving the bowlers some help, and it doen't look likely at the moment.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 April 2005 at 2:33am |
|
Yeah you're right that it is more likely to go the way of Sri Lanka putting pressure on NZ than the other way around. The follow on has easily been avoided and Sri Lanka should easily gain a score of at least 500 but can they get a first innings lead. I think i was wrong with what i posted above that NZ could pressure on Sri Lanka if they score quickly and put pressure on the final day which i doubt will happen.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 April 2005 at 5:51am |
|
Franklin eventually managing to get rid of the tail with the openers for NZ putting up their 50 stand and taking NZ's overall lead to over 100.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 April 2005 at 6:08am |
|
Why can't I get excited about New Zealand anymore? Losing Cairns and in the absence of Oram and Bond, they look so ordinary! Someone needs to put a bomb under them - imagine if all test sides went about their business like this mob - cricket would be back to the dark ages of the 1950's !!
Richardson seems to have been ably replaced too - by another crawler in Cummings !!! YES!!!! he's out - thank you God !!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 April 2005 at 6:30am |
|
Hamish Marshall falls and NZ are 64-2 with only 5 overs remaining today. The increasingly cautious Fleming has sent in Wiseman to try and see out the day. That kind of sums up Fleming's own form and the negativity of New Zealand's play.
A tame draw and an empty stadium tomorrow I expect. |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 April 2005 at 6:32am |
|
A maiden over and the light offered and the New Zealander's were off there like a rat down an aquaduct!!
Save your valium if you suffer sleepless nights and tune in to Napier tomorrow! |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 April 2005 at 11:59am |
|
So this match will now end ina draw. Not sure about your mob idea and explosives and all that Inducker, maybe a little too fanatical you don't think? I don't usually do this (outside bad weather anyway) but for the second Test i am actually predicting a draw. It seems the only likely outcome and even with no weather interfferance to me it really doesn't seem possible that either side can manage to gain out a victory and i think this will continue until the One Dayers start. |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 12:20am |
|
This game ain't over just yet! NZ now 4 down and are looking pretty wavery and are only 60 ahead. If Sri Lanka were to maybe bowl them out before Lunch or maybe just after maybe they could just chase down these runs?
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 12:50am |
|
No this match is probably over as the two out there in the middle seem to be doing all they can to play out the game. Astle will have enough experience not to do anything silly and assuming he gets a bit of luck NZ should see out the Test.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 1:40am |
|
Well talk about a match of contradictions! Sri Lanka have gotten 7 of the NZ wickets they need and NZ are 211 in front at lunch. With 60 overs still to play (and a new man at the crease) it is possible yet that Sri Lanka could win this if (and its a big if) they get those wickets quickly.
Edited by JALRC |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 7:41am |
|
New Zealand bowled out for 238 , setting Sri Lanka 302 to win. That was never going to happen and when bad light stopped play they were only 7-0 after just 1.3 overs.
A general comment , the wickets in New Zealand must be the worst kind of pitches for result cricket. We've seen India prepare ultradry surfaces that turn in the 1st hour - that is wrong too. These drop-in pitches that the New Zealanders have to use because their stadiums are used for both rugby and cricket at the same time , are just not good enough. Something needs to be done about raising the standards of test match surfaces. Australia provide the best pitches by a good margin. Quick , bouncy and true , there is something for both batsmen and bowlers. South Africa are pretty close too - but maybe just a little batsmen friendly nowadays. England always produces cricket wickets of interest , but the weather can make preparation a real ordeal. The other countries favour batting , even though Murali has won a large number of tests for Sri Lanka. NZ cricket is probably a little cash strapped , which is why they are sharing venues with their rugby counterparts , but cricket is the loser. Replacing the wicket today will not affect the rugby match scheduled for tomorrow one iota. I say stop using drop inpitches and get back to properly prepared surfaces. It'll be costlier to NZ cricket , but the outcome will surely be brighter and more successful outcomes to the matches. |
|
![]() |
|
Tailender
12th Man
Joined: 13 February 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 38 |
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 12:24pm |
|
Well we are getting a lot of high-scoring Test matches now, and clearly a lot of it is down to pitch preparation. I don't believe that the bowlers have all forgotten how to get batsmen out. But I imagine that the home authorities are always anxious to get a pitch that will last for five days. No-one wants to see matches finishing early with all the lost revenue that entails. But the risk is you get sky-high totals and drawn matches such as that in Antigua last year.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 1:46pm |
|
Yeah you're right Tailender that is mainly the reason as you don't want 2 day matches like South Africa had with Zimbabwe earlier this year do you? Its all about the money. NZ are certainly not cash starpped Inducker and they certainly don't need to the money to help restore their pitches! Personally i preffered the old style of hard fast pitches they used to have around 2002 like when India toured there and were left counting their bruises. Taught the Indians a lesson or two anyway. The best pitches in the world are still in England without a shadow of a doubt and Australia and the WI do come close (that exception being the match at St Johns last year) but the pitches on the subcontinent mainly India and Banngladesh are beyond help! Sri Lanka and Pakistan's pitches are not exactly great but at least they try! South Africa favor batsmen highly on their pitches but even still more often than not their matches produce results. You think that NZ's pitches were bad in 02? You should try playing in Canada! Their pitches are like Minefields! The average delivery is at nose height!!! |
|
![]() |
|
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6232 |
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 3:59pm |
|
The New Zealanders want the umpires to change their trousers for the next match. No joke, as the way Lasith Malinga (who picked up 9 wickets in the Test) bowls from close to the umpire the New Zealanders have trouble picking him up. An interesting one - any chance of 'trousers stopped play' in the next Test?
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 4:03pm |
|
I had the memo on my desk an hour ago and thought it was a joke! I threw it into the waste paper basket! Whoops! So it is serious then? I thought it was just a practical joke? Edited by JALRC |
|
![]() |
|
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6232 |
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 4:14pm |
|
http://www.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEW S/2005/APR/225655_NZ_08APR2005.html I didn't read it and think it was a April Fool's joke one week late!! |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 4:18pm |
|
Oh dear...it does look as if my secratary will be doing some rumaging in the waste disposal unit when she gets back in...how was i to know it was real? I like you thought it was an april fools joke a little late. Oh well!
|
|
![]() |
|
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6232 |
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 4:24pm |
|
Actually, you misunderstood me due to my appalling English in my other post - I read the trouser article and took it seriously straightaway. |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 4:31pm |
|
Oh no yeah right i got you yeah i see. So i was the only one who didn't act proffessionally then?
|
|
![]() |
|
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6232 |
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 4:34pm |
|
Technically you could argue my post wasn't very professional, seeing as I'm working as an English teacher. Has your secretary found the memo yet? |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 08 April 2005 at 5:09pm |
|
Well i think it was actually my interpretation that was wrong and your English was correct. But good on you for teaching English, especially to the French who more than anyone could do with it! Yeah she found the memo but wasn't best pleased having to go down the shoot! Wearing a miniskirt meant her legs were full of garbage when she got back up and she feels even more angred as it was her who put the memo on my desk first thing in the morning. She says she would have read it out to me had she known that i was going to "behave in such a manner". Oh dear, it does look as if i have been severely reprimanded by my secratary! Wanna hear what the memo says - this is worth all the problems in itself just to hear what it actually says? |
|
![]() |
|
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6232 |
Posted: 09 April 2005 at 8:29am |
|
Go on then - reprimanded by your secretary indeed - it's probably me who she'd be most annoyed with as if I hadn't raised it here, you wouldn't have thought about getting it retrieved!!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 09 April 2005 at 11:35am |
|
I did just point that out to her (she's mad enough having to work Saturday) and she said that she could not trust me to do anything and that i could never be left alone. Typical woman! She has no quarrels with you - she says you're one of the intellgant ones who knows what to keep and what to throw away...the temptation is throw her down the shoot but she's already been down there once in the last couple of days. I'll PM you the memo. |
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 April 2005 at 1:07am |
|
What a start to the secon Test! Sri Lanka batting first and four very quick wickets falling including both openers with Chris Martin picking up all 4 wickets. This is the complete opposite to previous match where taking a wicket was impossible for the first 3 days of the Test so it looks like NZ have reverted back to the hard fast pitches they were using a couple of years ago which is what they should have always stuck with. Fast start to the Test.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 April 2005 at 1:53am |
|
Sri Lanka really struggling and Martin now already has a 5 wicket haul.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 April 2005 at 2:43am |
|
Chris Martin on fire here and possible record breaking figures? He's taken all 6 wickets so far and he's now into the tail...i don't want to jynx him though.
|
|
![]() |
|
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 April 2005 at 11:16am |
|
Sri Lanka absolutely destroyed in their first innings all out for 211. Martin taking career best figures NZ inreply not doing too badly getting to 52 without loss, with it has to be the help of some of the Sri Lankan bowlers who conceded 14 runs in extras out of just 52. A third of the innings in extras so if NZ manage to put another 250 on the board they'll be laughing.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tailender
12th Man
Joined: 13 February 2005 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 38 |
Posted: 11 April 2005 at 12:54pm |
|
Great effort from Martin, who I suppose must have been in danger of being dropped. He managed to reproduce his form against SA. Having said that NZ let the visitors off the hook a little having reduced them to 86-7. What a contrast to the first Test - this one looks like being over in four days!
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |