Who is more aggressive Afridi or Sehwag?

yep

Agreed. as for as the aggressiveness is concerned the Afridi is the best and also  i want to mention Abd-ul- Razaq; he is alos aggressive. Remember his great aggressivenesses. E.g. five fours to Glenn Mcgrath and what he did today. 51 of 22 balls not out. I think in his innings He is 70 times aggrssive.  

Afridi the most dangerous player

That's right. Afridi is way more aggressive than Sehwag, and he only needs patience. If he was just a bit more patient, he would be consistent, and aggressive.

Sehwag is still a better player at the end of the day, taht is what counts, NOT agression. Sehwag scores his runs fast enough as it is, and actually gets runs too.

Shahid Afridi 1st got into the Paki team as a 16 yr old leg spinner, not as a slogger

Afridi is most dangerous and Sehwag is improved form of Afridi

Afridi is more aggressive and good player than sehwag. Sehwag is lucky.

Com on stick to the topic,what class has to do with most aggressive, we can discuss about class in stylish one, Most aggressive batsman in the world is AFRIDI, sehwag lags miles behind, dhoni, gilchrist,symonds, cairns, razzack,are a lot better than sehwag, please compare afridi with dhoni.

I am sorry but none of these batsman have any class whatsoever the only thing they know is to throw their bats on evrything, and this is what evrybody wants from them, there are lot many batsmen to show class.

according to me agressive doesn't mean six and four. its getting ur runs fast. one run or 2 runs almost every ball will help u make a 100 in just 85 balls. afridi is a fluke. sehwag is a better batsmen.

there is alot of indian bias in these posts..Veeru is a wonderful stroke maker, one of the best in the world, but has the same technical problems outside the off stump as afridi..jus to put things into prospective..afridi has hit almost 300 sixers in one day cricket, he has batted all over the batting order, especially in the lower order, which explains his average of 24..ask any genuin cricket fan, one day cricket is about strike rate, which afrdid excells in, he has scored runs against all nations, even in autralia, and lets not forget what he did to the indian bowlers in india in 2005! why dnt u ask them about afridi's talents.

he along side sehwaq are great for cricket, we should be greatful that they are both asian players! the current series in pakisatn will seperate the men amongst the boys.

 

 

Originally posted by MiNiWaRnEy Sorry u have that the wrong way, Afridi is lucky. Sehwag got into both ICC test and ODI teams, he has class. Afridi has no class whatsoever.

I will totally agree on this. Sehwag was an early talent spotted for his batting. He played in the 1998 under 19 world cup as a batsman and now almost 8 years he is prospering with the bat.

Afridi on the other hand was selected as a bowler. He was not known for his batting before he got selected. He just hits whichever ball he sees without timing it properly (which bowler cannot do that?)

Agressive does not just mean SIXES and FOURS it means always looking to score runs just about every ball and quickly. Shahid doesnt look to score runs, he looks to slog. That is it.

Yes, but Afridi bats for 50 balls like once a decade.

again running away from the discussion, even he bats for once, but produces the best, why couldnt any of other highly consistent and highly aggressive score a hundred in lesser balls than AFRIDI!

What Afridi gets past 50 balls like once a decade.