<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act</title>
  <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Coaching : Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act</description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:34:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.71</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2862</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act :  Originally posted by inzamam329Chanderpaul,...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=110096#110096</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=723">shan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 18 January 2007 at 9:34pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by inzamam329</strong></em><br /><br />Chanderpaul, Afridi, Ejaz Ahmed all have poor techniques yet they did pretty well.</td></tr></table> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Chanderpaul shuffles a lot and always tries to work the ball onto the legside hence suscetable to the inswinging balls.</DIV><DIV>Even Chris Gayle doesn't have a great feet movement, doesn't come in the line of the ball and is vulnerable against medium pace bowling swinging into him. Typical of West Indian batting line up, exciting batsmen with faulty&nbsp;technique, making them so unpredictable.</DIV><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by shan - 18 January 2007 at 9:39pm</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=110096#110096</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act :  Originally posted by spin wizard Brian...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=108183#108183</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=723">shan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 10 January 2007 at 6:12am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by spin wizard</strong></em><br /><br /><P>Brian Charles Lara!!!</P></td></tr></table> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Due to his extra high back lift of the bat? He&nbsp;still plays pull shots with his feet almost 6 inches off the ground, but he used to do that more often in his&nbsp;prime youth,&nbsp;when his reflexes were sharper.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=108183#108183</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : Chanderpaul, Afridi, Ejaz Ahmed...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107825#107825</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=762">inzamam329</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 8:13pm<br /><br />Chanderpaul, Afridi, Ejaz Ahmed all have poor techniques yet they did pretty well.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107825#107825</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : Brian Charles Lara!!! </title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107824#107824</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=837">spin wizard</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 8:10pm<br /><br /><P>Brian Charles Lara!!!</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107824#107824</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : ....nowhat I am saying is completely...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107755#107755</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 4:49pm<br /><br />....no<br><br>what I am saying is completely the opposite, I am saying that if Bradman had an average as high as 100 without many not outs then it must be down to him scoring a lot of runs. Do you understand?<br><br>Rate of scoring was not important in those days in the times of the timeless match. I would rather have a player like Bradman who scored loads of runs that Jessop who scored a few (compared to Bradman) but a hell of a lot faster<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107755#107755</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : So not getting out is more important...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107751#107751</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2396">W.G.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 4:46pm<br /><br />So not getting out is more important than the rate of scoring?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107751#107751</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : well obviously not but Bradman...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107748#107748</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 4:42pm<br /><br />well obviously not but Bradman wasnt a tailender and he averaged 100 with not many not outs.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107748#107748</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : A question then - is average the...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107744#107744</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2396">W.G.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 4:39pm<br /><br />A question then - is average the only determining factor in 'greatness' ..... if, as a tail ender, I contrive to score slowly but sell my wicket dearly, meaning I average, say, 125 over a 40 or 50 test career, does it make me a great batsman with a highest knock of 45?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107744#107744</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act :   Originally posted by W.G.Saying...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107686#107686</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 3:55pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by W.G.</strong></em><br /><br /><br><br>Saying he is better than Bradman is presenting an opinion, a considered opinion.&nbsp; Reacting in your way and slinging insults is childish, but expected.<br><br></td></tr></table><br><br>Eh actually, yes you did say i insulted you, you suffered from memory lapses or something? I am making a considered opinion too. You are crazy to think a guy who averaged 32 is better than a guy who averaged 100. You are senile and mad. It is that simple. I dont care how far he hit the ball, all I know is that one guy averaged 68 more than the other. So sop talking rubbish fool.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107686#107686</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : I didn&amp;#039;t say you insulted...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107677#107677</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2396">W.G.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 3:34pm<br /><br />I didn't say you insulted me - did I?<br><br>Darts is as much a sport as golf, I rest on that particular issue (save to say Woods is very much the better golfer).<br><br>George Best is clearly not a great sportsman, in his short lived career he achieved very little - he is as much a Harmison of the football world as he is a great, all the potential and the talent but with little to show for it.&nbsp; In terms of footballing greatness there are many greater than Best.<br><br><br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107677#107677</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : I didn&amp;#039;t insult you once...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107668#107668</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 3:24pm<br /><br />I didn't insult you once there. "mate" is what I say o evrryone, whether it be Clobber, Fishcake or dare I say it you. In my opinion those sportsman are the greatest in their respective sports unless there is someone only you know about who is greater than them which I highly doubt. And byt the way, dont say Phil Taylor, I wouldnt want you to look like a fool.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107668#107668</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act :   Originally posted by 70_degree_spinMate,...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107665#107665</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2396">W.G.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 3:14pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by 70_degree_spin</strong></em><br /><br />Mate, he averaged 32, he played hundreds of matches and do you think in his obituary they are going to say "This man was rubbish." They are always kind to them in obituaries, even with that west indian cricketer who was hanged after murdering his wife. <br><br>Saying he is better than bradman is insulting to the Don and I'm not going to accept that you think this slogger is better than the greatest sportsman that ever lived, he ranks with greats like Mohammed Ali, Jim Clark, George Best, Jack nicklaus, Pele and Jonah Lomu. This guy Jessop doesnt. I am at a loss for words I really am.<br></td></tr></table>OK let's sort a few things out - most importantly any understanding that I might be your 'mate' ....... clearly I am not.<br><br>Saying he is better than Bradman is presenting an opinion, a considered opinion.&nbsp; Reacting in your way and slinging insults is childish, but expected.<br><br>I also opine that your list of 'greatest sportsmen' needs a little work.<br><br>It is a matter of fact that comparison is difficult as there are so many variables, particularly in a complex game such as cricket - but I reserve my right to have an opinion, and will enter willingly into any sensible discussion - but will not entertain a nipper throwing a tantrum and tossing his dummy out of his pram.<br><br>If you really are at a loss for words - stop typing them <br><br>x<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107665#107665</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : Mate, he averaged 32, he played...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107659#107659</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 3:00pm<br /><br />Mate, he averaged 32, he played hundreds of matches and do you think in his obituary they are going to say "This man was rubbish." They are always kind to them in obituaries, even with that west indian cricketer who was hanged after murdering his wife. <br><br>Saying he is better than bradman is insulting to the Don and I'm not going to accept that you think this slogger is better than the greatest sportsman that ever lived, he ranks with greats like Mohammed Ali, Jim Clark, George Best, Jack nicklaus, Pele and Jonah Lomu. This guy Jessop doesnt. I am at a loss for words I really am.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107659#107659</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act :   Originally posted by 70_degree_spinI...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107650#107650</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2396">W.G.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 2:10pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by 70_degree_spin</strong></em><br /><br />I agree but saying he is better than Bradman really set me off.</td></tr></table>Why - can't you engage in debate or discussion without getting angry?<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107650#107650</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act :   Originally posted by 70_degree_spinI&amp;#039;m...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107649#107649</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2396">W.G.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 2:08pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by 70_degree_spin</strong></em><br /><br />I'm not saying I wouldnt have killed to see him play but saying he's better than Bradman is far fetched in my opinion. Theres just such a huge difference between them. Jessop <b>rarely </b>made an innings but when he did, I have to admit WOW. Especially that 191, thats remarkable but I still dont rate him as highly as say Javed Miandad or Jack hobbs never mind the Don himself.</td></tr></table>To quote HS Altham (probably a better judge of player than one 70 Degree Spin) "no cricketer that has ever lived hit the ball sooften, so fast and with such a bewildering variety of strokes".<br><br>OK, so you like to judge your cricketers on average alone - me, I prefer to look at the all round package, and Jessop was a giant (at 5' 7").<br><br>Let's face it 70 - you'd never heard of him before this thread, let alone judged him against others.<br><br>53 centuries (5 200+) and 127 50s - yup you are spot on there nips, Jessop rarely made an innings <img src="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="C&#111;nfused" /><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107649#107649</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : I&amp;#039;m not saying I wouldnt...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107625#107625</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 1:35pm<br /><br />I'm not saying I wouldnt have killed to see him play but saying he's better than Bradman is far fetched in my opinion. Theres just such a huge difference between them. Jessop rarely made an innings but when he did, I have to admit WOW. Especially that 191, thats remarkable but I still dont rate him as highly as say Javed Miandad or Jack hobbs never mind the Don himself.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107625#107625</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : Jessop was a real crowd pleaser...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107619#107619</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=229">Sledger</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 1:18pm<br /><br />Jessop was a real crowd pleaser and would be a great asset to any sidetoday. As dashers go , he rates with any other and would be idolised inthe one day arena nowadays - looking down he must really be upset thathe was born 100 years too early!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107619#107619</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : I agree but saying he is better...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107617#107617</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 1:09pm<br /><br />I agree but saying he is better than Bradman really set me off. Not to mention Bradman was and is still the breatest player to play with an unorthodox stance, he appatently had a very open stance.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107617#107617</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : I don&amp;#039;t agree with W.G. at...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107612#107612</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=723">shan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 1:04pm<br /><br /><P>I don't agree with W.G. at all regarding rating Jessop even somewhere near to Sir Donald, but only to the extent that mentioning Jessop here is fair enough because the man has got good enough statistics to be called an achiever despite having unorthodox batting style.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107612#107612</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : He averaged 32 in first class...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107600#107600</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 12:48pm<br /><br />He averaged 32 in first class matches, he was just a slogger that sometimes pulled it off, to say he is greater than Bradman is absurd, madness. This is the most ridiculous idea I have ever heard in my life. I hope you arent forgetting that Bradman was a fast scorer as well? And about his bowling, bowlers in those days had far better averages than today because the wickets were so terrible. This guy would not make it in to the top 100 players of all time. I am lost for words at this. He averaged 21 in test matches for goodness sake. the best batsman ever? Dear lord, I'm trying to respect your opinion but it is so difficult because it is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. better than Bradman, Why dont you say Afridi? He scored at a similar rate and averages something near to that but you dont see anyone saying he's the greatest player do you?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107600#107600</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : These achievements look great,...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107596#107596</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=723">shan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 12:43pm<br /><br /><P>These achievements look great, no doubt, but I would say the man was unlucky not to find so many test matches to prove his mattle and to be rated amongst the best of the batsmen; that's why I was surprised at the first instance. Even thought&nbsp;I still&nbsp;wouldn't rate him above Sir Donald Bradman even in the first class,&nbsp;I got your point, the thread is about the achievers with unorthodox technique, no matter whether it's first class or internaltional cricket, so to mention him with the highest achievers is fair enough.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107596#107596</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : OK let us take the test cricket...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107581#107581</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2396">W.G.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 12:15pm<br /><br />OK let us take the test cricket reference first.&nbsp; At the turn of the 20th century test cricket was a developing notion - during the major part of Jessop's career there were only three test playing countries and tours were few and far between.&nbsp; Jessop suffered from chronic motion sickness which prevented him from touring more than once with England.&nbsp; <br><br>His Test match appearances covered the years 1899 to 1912, but theselectors found him a problem; some were ready to regard him as anautomatic choice, others regarded him as too much of a gamble.&nbsp; When considering achievement test cricket is not the defining characteristic.<br><br>The average county rate of scoring is about 25 runs an hour per batsman.&nbsp; The truly great batsmen score at much faster rates - Grace and Hutton scored at 36 runs anhour, CB Fry and FS Jackson at 40, Hobbs, Hendren, Clem Hill andHammond at 43, JT Tyldesley, Compton, Bradman and MacLaren at 47,McCabe and Ranji at 50, Duleepsinhji, George Cox, Macartney at 52, REFoster, Trumper and Woolley at 55. The evidence of all Jessop's 179scores of over 50 (some one in five of all his innings) shows that hescored these innings at a rate of 79 runs an hour. His 53 scores ofover 100 were scored at nearly 83 runs an hour.&nbsp; <br><br>He remains the most destructive batsman to grace the game - and this thread relates to top achievers who use unorthodox technique.&nbsp; His stance at the wicket was utterly misleading; with feet apart, hecrouched low, going even lower as the ball was delivered; he held hishands apart on a very heavy bat with a long handle. If you didn't know,you might think he was a grim stonewaller bent on survival. But themoment the ball was delivered he leapt at it like a spring unwinding,and carved it in all directions.<br><br>It is well worth remembering that during Jessop's career boundaries were very different beasts.&nbsp; If the law governing sixes had been amended before 1910 his aggregatewould have been considerably increased. Up to that time you had to hit the ball right out of the ground to score a six, and many ofJessop's big hits brought himonly four runs. He scored 53 centuries (five of them over 200) and atthe time of the end of his career only 13 other batsmen had made agreater number. No less than four times Jessop scored two hundreds inthe same match; CB Fry with five times was the only one to surpassthis. His average score for innings over a hundred was no less than140, which compares well with Grace 146, Richards 144, Boycott 140 andHobbs 134.<br><br>Twelve times he reached his hundred within an hour - a feat achievedonly about 40 times in the history of the game. His fastest hundred washis 101 in 40 minutes against Yorkshire at Harrogate in 1897 - aninnings divided by a lunch interval in the middle of it. In 1907 atHastings when playing for theGentlemen of the South against the Players he reached 100 in 42minutes, and went on to score 191 out of 234 in exactly 90 minutes - aninnings which is numerically faster than Alletson's better-known 189 in90 minutes against Sussex in 1911.<br><br>Jessop still holds the record for the fastest double-century ever made,for in his score of 286 he reached 200 in two hours; he also holdssecond place with 200 in 130 minutes when he scored 234 againstSomerset in 1905. In 1901 when scoring 233 in 150 minutes againstYorkshire at Lord's he reached 200 in 135 minutes. In many of hisinnings he would have scored more had the present law about sixes beenin use: in his 191 at Hastings, for instance, he hit five sixes out ofthe ground, and also hit 11 balls over the ropes. This would have madehis score 213 instead of 191.<br><br>Ohh - and there is the small matter of 873 1st class wickets at an average of 22 apiece to consider - with 41 five-fors and 4 10 wicket hauls, and just under 500 1st class catches and an average 30 run outs per seasion.<br><br>These things are always subjective and Bradman stands out as an extraordinary cricketer, but for me Jessop has the edge.&nbsp; <br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 12:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107581#107581</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act :  Originally posted by Smack^...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107565#107565</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=723">shan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 11:48am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Smack</strong></em><br /><br />^ Sehwag will never change, he will&nbsp;just always fail outside the sub continent and make loads of runs on flat home decks. <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Anyways back to topic</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Paul Adams had a very unusual bowling action still made it to international level.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Used to be a guy in English county cricket forgot his name, he used to bat about 2 feet outside leg stump lol</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></td></tr></table> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>I have seen&nbsp;Paul Adams&nbsp;with his&nbsp;odd looking&nbsp;bowling action and getting important wickets for Soutch Africa. He had the unconventional style of bowling. How strange to see a bowler delivering the ball with his fact&nbsp;pointed towards the sky. I would call him Unorthodox Chinamen like style. Most of his wickets were a result of his totally unconventional style which batsmen found difficult to pick.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107565#107565</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : Some form of relation I imagine...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107563#107563</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2137">143no</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 11:46am<br /><br />Some form of relation I imagine shan.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107563#107563</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : You mean the man with 18 test...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107556#107556</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=723">shan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 11:37am<br /><br />You mean the man with 18 test matches? I cann't even think of comparing the two. But there might be a good reason for you to rate Mr. Jessop higher than the legend. May I ask why?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107556#107556</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : For most effective yet unorthodox...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107545#107545</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2396">W.G.</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2007 at 10:56am<br /><br />For most effective yet unorthodox batting stance I cite probably the greatest Batsman to grace the game (yes I know we are all meant to hail the Don, but in my opinion he was second best) Gilbert Jessop.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 10:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=107545#107545</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : ^ Sehwag will never change, he...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=106746#106746</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1177">Smack</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 06 January 2007 at 4:47am<br /><br />^ Sehwag will never change, he will&nbsp;just always fail outside the sub continent and make loads of runs on flat home decks.<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Anyways back to topic</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Paul Adams had a very unusual bowling action still made it to international level.</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Used to be a guy in English county cricket forgot his name, he used to bat about 2 feet outside leg stump lol</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 04:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=106746#106746</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : So is Inzi, who doesn&amp;#039;t really...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=106362#106362</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=723">shan</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05 January 2007 at 5:01am<br /><br /><P>So is Inzi, who doesn't really move his feet much these days. He's basically an eye player with a superb timing. However, one can quote the example of Sehwag, who lacks in feet movement and is suffering a lot due to this technical flaw. He really needs to improve in this area or he's out of the scene.</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 05:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=106362#106362</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act :  Originally posted by 70_degree_spinWhat...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=106233#106233</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1640">TCA123</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 January 2007 at 7:53pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by 70_degree_spin</strong></em><br /><br />What about Marcus Trescothick, hardly moves his feet at all.</td></tr></table> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Thats a good example. People always talk about the foot movement being so important yet Tresco proves it&nbsp;can be done with a still head and timing.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=106233#106233</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Achievers with improper batting stance/bowling act : What about Marcus Trescothick,...</title>
   <link>http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=106215#106215</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=1790">70_degree_spin</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 2862<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04 January 2007 at 7:28pm<br /><br />What about Marcus Trescothick, hardly moves his feet at all.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 19:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2862&amp;PID=106215#106215</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>