Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Clarke or Razzaq http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Cricket World Ratings : Clarke or Razzaq Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:20:38 +0000 Fri, 14 Apr 2006 04:56:32 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.71 360 www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1475 Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_images/logo.png http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ Clarke or Razzaq : Why in the first place are you... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41210#41210 Author: MiNiWaRnEy
Subject: 1475
Posted: 14 April 2006 at 4:56am

Why in the first place are you comparing clarke and razzaq..Two completely different cricketers in some aspects. ]]> Fri, 14 Apr 2006 04:56:32 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41210#41210 Clarke or Razzaq : Yea I think because he has played... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41180#41180 Author: abubakar52
Subject: 1475
Posted: 14 April 2006 at 3:05am

Yea I think because he has played more mathces therefore he has more experience.]]> Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:05:00 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41180#41180 Clarke or Razzaq : Look I'm back and I'm... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41177#41177 Author: masterblaster
Subject: 1475
Posted: 14 April 2006 at 2:54am

Look I'm back and I'm nice now. Isn't that respectable.

Over all I think Razzaq is better.

Edited by masterblaster]]> Fri, 14 Apr 2006 02:54:32 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41177#41177 Clarke or Razzaq : You're not supposed to circumvent... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41143#41143 Author: -JP-
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 11:53pm

You're not supposed to circumvent the ban, no.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:53:28 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41143#41143 Clarke or Razzaq : Hi -JP- If you are banned you... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41133#41133 Author: abubakar52
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 11:13pm

Hi -JP-

If you are banned you are not supposed to come back right?]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:13:53 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41133#41133 Clarke or Razzaq : Originally posted by masterblasterSorry... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41131#41131 Author: -JP-
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 11:00pm

Originally posted by masterblaster

Sorry mate. You might as well know I am new here. You banned me before and I am trying to be nicer this time.

Seems someone has misunderstood the idea of being banned.

]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:00:50 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41131#41131 Clarke or Razzaq : Originally posted by Sledger Originally... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41130#41130 Author: abubakar52
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 10:57pm

Originally posted by Sledger

Originally posted by -JP-

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE


batting,bowling,allrounder in what if its bowling and all rounder razzaq if batting clarke



Sorry?!



I stared at that for a full 10 minutes JP and all I got was a severe migraine!!


I understand this it means. The three things for an all-rounder are batting, bolwing= all-rounder. So he said if its bowling all-rounder then razzaq. If batting all-rounder Clark.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:57:58 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41130#41130 Clarke or Razzaq : Originally posted by Sledger Originally... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41128#41128 Author: masterblaster
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 10:51pm

Originally posted by Sledger

Originally posted by masterblaster

Back up your opinion with facts please.


That's rather cheeky , seeing YOU posted the thread without any facts whatsoever! Saying you "deeply" like Clarke suggests you want to marry him - it says absolutely zilch about his cricketing prowess.

These threads annoy me , Clarke and Razzak have nothing in common and play the game in a completely different fashion.



Sorry mate. You might as well know I am new here. You banned me before and I am trying to be nicer this time.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:51:08 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41128#41128 Clarke or Razzaq : razzaq is an excellent player... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41068#41068 Author: jumbo
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 7:05pm

razzaq is an excellent player and i rank him  higher than clarke. he is a proven performer. his bowling is good and his explosive batting can change the course of the game. he is a powerful hitter. clarke's fielding and batting is very good but he has still not played so many matches. he has to prove himself in many years to come. he is still young and i think he can become a great player in future. but as of now razzaq is better.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:05:26 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41068#41068 Clarke or Razzaq : Razzak and Clarke and exactly... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41021#41021 Author: Jay dee
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 3:28pm

Razzak and Clarke and exactly a comparison, it should have been between Razzak and Kallis.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:28:17 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=41021#41021 Clarke or Razzaq : Originally posted by Sledger Originally... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40839#40839 Author: Clapo
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:54am

Originally posted by Sledger

Originally posted by masterblaster

Back up your opinion with facts please.


That's rather cheeky , seeing YOU posted the thread without any facts whatsoever! Saying you "deeply" like Clarke suggests you want to marry him - it says absolutely zilch about his cricketing prowess.

These threads annoy me , Clarke and Razzak have nothing in common and play the game in a completely different fashion.

my point exactly

]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 06:54:11 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40839#40839 Clarke or Razzaq : Originally posted by -JP- Originally... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40836#40836 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:51am

Originally posted by -JP-

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE


batting,bowling,allrounder in what if its bowling and all rounder razzaq if batting clarke



Sorry?!



I stared at that for a full 10 minutes JP and all I got was a severe migraine!!

Edited by Sledger]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 06:51:37 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40836#40836 Clarke or Razzaq : Originally posted by masterblasterBack... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40835#40835 Author: Sledger
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:50am

Originally posted by masterblaster

Back up your opinion with facts please.


That's rather cheeky , seeing YOU posted the thread without any facts whatsoever! Saying you "deeply" like Clarke suggests you want to marry him - it says absolutely zilch about his cricketing prowess.

These threads annoy me , Clarke and Razzak have nothing in common and play the game in a completely different fashion.

]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 06:50:25 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40835#40835 Clarke or Razzaq : was only 1 match, and lets not... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40829#40829 Author: Clapo
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:38am

was only 1 match, and lets not forget that only ponting, gilly and haydos made good scores for australia in that match.

]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 06:38:18 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40829#40829 Clarke or Razzaq : michael clarke for me but when... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40826#40826 Author: Charlie
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:30am

michael clarke for me but when he is given the chance to perform he doesnt. recently at the bangladesh game he scored low scores. but i still think he should get a place since he is still young.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 06:30:09 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40826#40826 Clarke or Razzaq : Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLEif... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40748#40748 Author: masterblaster
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:58am

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE

if you had to pick then razzaq hes the complete package


Well said Anil Well said true he is the complete package.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:58:05 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40748#40748 Clarke or Razzaq : if you had to pick then razzaq... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40740#40740 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:52am

if you had to pick then razzaq hes the complete package]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:52:22 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40740#40740 Clarke or Razzaq : I think Razzaq Is in Clarke's... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40722#40722 Author: masterblaster
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:33am

I think Razzaq Is in Clarke's league they are both amazing and deserve to be compared. ]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:33:58 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40722#40722 Clarke or Razzaq : hmmmmmmmmmm........ it's... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40720#40720 Author: Clapo
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:32am

hmmmmmmmmmm........ it's hard to compare two players who have completely different roles.... Razzaq is an allrounder, clarke is a batsman

Seems pretty straight foward, Clarke is the better batsmen and Fielder, and razzaq is the better bowler case closed

]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:32:17 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40720#40720 Clarke or Razzaq : It makes perfect sense Anil but... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40715#40715 Author: masterblaster
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:23am

It makes perfect sense Anil but Razzaq has made important knowck for the Paki's he also has more expeirience in tests and in one day but Clarke is a better fileder and helps the Aussies Razzaq helps Pakistan many times in important situations. Razzaq is the reason pakistan's lower order is alive.

Edited by masterblaster]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:23:28 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40715#40715 Clarke or Razzaq : razzaqs the better bowler clarke... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40713#40713 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:11am

razzaqs the better bowler clarke is the better fielder and batter does tha make sence this time]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:11:06 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40713#40713 Clarke or Razzaq : Originally posted by ANIL KU... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40709#40709 Author: -JP-
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:04am

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE

batting,bowling,allrounder in what if its bowling and all rounder razzaq if batting clarke

Sorry?!

]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:04:41 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40709#40709 Clarke or Razzaq : batting,bowling,allrounder in... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40708#40708 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:01am

batting,bowling,allrounder in what if its bowling and all rounder razzaq if batting clarke

]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:01:44 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40708#40708 Clarke or Razzaq : Back up your opinion with facts... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40704#40704 Author: masterblaster
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 1:54am

Back up your opinion with facts please.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 01:54:30 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40704#40704 Clarke or Razzaq : clarkey http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40701#40701 Author: skip_eng
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 1:51am

clarkey ]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 01:51:46 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40701#40701 Clarke or Razzaq : I am an Aussie and I deeply like... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40698#40698 Author: masterblaster
Subject: 1475
Posted: 13 April 2006 at 1:50am

I am an Aussie and I deeply like Clarke but this Razzaq guy has pure talent who do you think is better.]]> Thu, 13 Apr 2006 01:50:10 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475&PID=40698#40698