Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum

Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Dravid http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Cricket World Ratings : Dravid Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:54:28 +0000 Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:53:08 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.71 360 www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=735 Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_images/logo.png http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ Dravid : Uhh who? http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143903#143903 Author: scuudz
Subject: 735
Posted: 04 July 2007 at 2:53pm

Uhh who?]]> Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:53:08 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143903#143903 Dravid : Good old danny, is he still kicking?Edited... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143869#143869 Author: 143no
Subject: 735
Posted: 04 July 2007 at 11:31am

Good old danny, is he still kicking?

Edited by 143no - 04 July 2007 at 11:32am]]> Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:31:45 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143869#143869 Dravid : Walter Mitty'll be posting... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143808#143808 Author: Sledger
Subject: 735
Posted: 04 July 2007 at 6:29am

Walter Mitty'll be posting next!]]> Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:29:02 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143808#143808 Dravid : Enough a blunt knife would have... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143717#143717 Author: bondy
Subject: 735
Posted: 03 July 2007 at 12:58pm

Enough a blunt knife would have recognised that one.]]> Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:58:11 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143717#143717 Dravid : pretty sharp there bondy http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143709#143709 Author: 143no
Subject: 735
Posted: 03 July 2007 at 12:02pm

pretty sharp there bondy

]]> Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:02:55 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143709#143709 Dravid : Originally posted by BackFoot... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143651#143651 Author: bondy
Subject: 735
Posted: 03 July 2007 at 4:14am

Originally posted by BackFoot Master

Originally posted by sledger

who and when did you speak to the South African attack?

I made a long distance phone call and spoke to Andre Nel.

I told him not to make Gambhier look too small in the other matches so take thing a bit easier with him and as long as he doesn't pass 50 runs i am proud of u.

Don't believe it sorry.

]]> Tue, 03 Jul 2007 04:14:04 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143651#143651 Dravid : He cant but Gunther can. ;-) http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143648#143648 Author: scuudz
Subject: 735
Posted: 03 July 2007 at 3:01am

He cant but Gunther can. ;-)]]> Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:01:24 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=143648#143648 Dravid : Got to say I'm suprised by... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142704#142704 Author: Sledger
Subject: 735
Posted: 28 June 2007 at 6:18am

Got to say I'm suprised by that lad , I didn't know Andre Nel could use a phone !]]> Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:18:15 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142704#142704 Dravid : Originally posted by sledgerwho... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142595#142595 Author: BackFoot Master
Subject: 735
Posted: 27 June 2007 at 5:19pm

Originally posted by sledger

who and when did you speak to the South African attack?

I made a long distance phone call and spoke to Andre Nel.

I told him not to make Gambhier look too small in the other matches so take thing a bit easier with him and as long as he doesn't pass 50 runs i am proud of u.

Edited by BackFoot Master - 27 June 2007 at 5:20pm]]> Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:19:44 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142595#142595 Dravid : Originally posted by BackFoot... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142530#142530 Author: Sledger
Subject: 735
Posted: 27 June 2007 at 10:51am

Originally posted by BackFoot Master

At least the Teenager advice got Gamhier for a DUCK.

You still haven't answered my question.....
]]> Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:51:11 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142530#142530 Dravid : i think that he should bat at... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142399#142399 Author: ryanwkp
Subject: 735
Posted: 26 June 2007 at 10:04pm

i think that he should bat at no3 because then it gives him time to build him innings before going for the slog in the last 10 overs]]> Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:04:21 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142399#142399 Dravid : At least the Teenager advice got... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142349#142349 Author: BackFoot Master
Subject: 735
Posted: 26 June 2007 at 7:03pm

At least the Teenager advice got Gamhier for a DUCK.]]> Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:03:00 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142349#142349 Dravid : I'm intrigued , who and when... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142232#142232 Author: Sledger
Subject: 735
Posted: 26 June 2007 at 6:32am

I'm intrigued , who and when did you speak to the South African attack?

I'm surprised they're taking advice off a teenager.
]]> Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:32:17 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142232#142232 Dravid : If india doesn't become a... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142130#142130 Author: BackFoot Master
Subject: 735
Posted: 25 June 2007 at 3:53pm

If india doesn't become a good side again within the next four years, well i sorry for india after that.

Well I had a long phone talk with the South African bowlers yesterday and tell them plain out make sure to get Gambhier for duck in all the matches.

I bet u after those four matches against South Africa, they will recall Sehwag because Gambhier ain't making no runs.

]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:53:54 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142130#142130 Dravid : Originally posted by BackFoot... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142057#142057 Author: 143no
Subject: 735
Posted: 25 June 2007 at 6:08am

Originally posted by BackFoot Master

So you only watching this series and not in the future.

One series experiment is no way close to any success, it has to be based on many.

well I am not a fortune teller so I assume we are talking about now, Sehwag has been dropped and rightly so, if he performs domestically he may get called back, who knows, as for the future how much longer do you think these guy's have left, india would now have to have the oldest batting line up in the world. They will lose Tendulker, Dravid, Ganguly all sooner rather than later, and all around the same time, indian cricket has a long way to keep going down before it even comes close to being a good side again.

]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:08:29 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142057#142057 Dravid : Originally posted by 143noSehwag... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142049#142049 Author: dips_december
Subject: 735
Posted: 25 June 2007 at 5:03am

Originally posted by 143no

Sehwag has been dropped hasn't he?

I hope he has been dropped for good. Useless player because the bowlers have found his weaknesses and he is not ready to work upon them.

]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:03:38 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142049#142049 Dravid : So you only watching this series... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142038#142038 Author: BackFoot Master
Subject: 735
Posted: 25 June 2007 at 2:22am

So you only watching this series and not in the future.

One series experiment is no way close to any success, it has to be based on many.

Edited by BackFoot Master - 25 June 2007 at 2:23am]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:22:05 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142038#142038 Dravid : Sehwag has been dropped hasn't... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142035#142035 Author: 143no
Subject: 735
Posted: 25 June 2007 at 1:12am

Sehwag has been dropped hasn't he?]]> Mon, 25 Jun 2007 01:12:27 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142035#142035 Dravid : Man no5 because their is Sehwag,... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142021#142021 Author: BackFoot Master
Subject: 735
Posted: 24 June 2007 at 9:53pm

Man no5 because their is Sehwag, Tendulkar and GAnguly for the top three spot.

]]> Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:53:54 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142021#142021 Dravid : I think dravid would defenitely... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142005#142005 Author: sporty
Subject: 735
Posted: 24 June 2007 at 6:22pm

I think dravid would defenitely come in at no.3 in tests. In odis too dravid at no.3 wouldn't be such a bad idea especially if one of the openers fall early.]]> Sun, 24 Jun 2007 18:22:09 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=142005#142005 Dravid : in ODI i think 4 or 5 in Test... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=141920#141920 Author: blaster17
Subject: 735
Posted: 24 June 2007 at 11:35am

in ODI i think 4 or 5 in Test i think maybe 3 to hold the innings together]]> Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:35:41 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=141920#141920 Dravid : I think Dravid should come in... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=140170#140170 Author: sporty
Subject: 735
Posted: 15 June 2007 at 8:26pm

I think Dravid should come in at no.3. Thats best for Dravid and for the team. Especially now as the Indian team is going to England. I think to tackle the swing of the English bowlers India needs Dravid to come in at no.3. He's probably our best technical batsman. Dhoni would be more suited at no.3 when India is playing on subcontinental pitches where there is not much swing or bounce.

]]> Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:26:52 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=140170#140170 Dravid : Enough brains to write in sentences... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134273#134273 Author: Sledger
Subject: 735
Posted: 22 May 2007 at 6:58am

Enough brains to write in sentences and block IP addresses lad. ]]> Tue, 22 May 2007 06:58:21 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134273#134273 Dravid : Originally posted by SledgerIf... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134227#134227 Author: SEHWAG NO.1
Subject: 735
Posted: 21 May 2007 at 10:49pm

Originally posted by Sledger

If his ideal place is 3 , how can it be better for the team to bat at 4 or 5 ?

It's pretty difficult having a contradictory statement within the same sentence - congratulations.

buddy, you need to take it easy, if you had any brains you would kno what i meant, which since you dont is that dravid would make more runs at number 3 and his stats would be good. however, dravid plays quite slow thus it would be better for the team to have someone like ddhoni to come in at 3 to score quickly. if the batting by chance collapses dravid will be there at no 5 to steady the innings

]]> Mon, 21 May 2007 22:49:54 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134227#134227 Dravid : Sledger hates cricket- there you... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134090#134090 Author: bondy
Subject: 735
Posted: 21 May 2007 at 10:59am

Sledger hates cricket- there you go.]]> Mon, 21 May 2007 10:59:34 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134090#134090 Dravid : If his ideal place is 3 , how... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134085#134085 Author: Sledger
Subject: 735
Posted: 21 May 2007 at 9:56am

If his ideal place is 3 , how can it be better for the team to bat at 4 or 5 ?

It's pretty difficult having a contradictory statement within the same sentence - congratulations.
]]> Mon, 21 May 2007 09:56:52 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134085#134085 Dravid : dravids ideal position would be... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134017#134017 Author: SEHWAG NO.1
Subject: 735
Posted: 21 May 2007 at 1:31am

dravids ideal position would be 3, but for the betterment of the team, id think 4 or 5 would be better]]> Mon, 21 May 2007 01:31:56 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=134017#134017 Dravid : i think he should come in now... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=133951#133951 Author: blaster17
Subject: 735
Posted: 20 May 2007 at 1:08pm

i think he should come in now about 4 or 5 and yuvraj or dhoni in number 3 ]]> Sun, 20 May 2007 13:08:18 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=133951#133951 Dravid : I always like Dravid at 5. I think... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=130007#130007 Author: spin wizard
Subject: 735
Posted: 30 April 2007 at 7:58pm

I always like Dravid at 5. I think he does really well there. I don't know how his stats look there but he has played some classy knocks there.

]]> Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:58:23 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=130007#130007 Dravid : 4 sounds about right, neither... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=129667#129667 Author: bondy
Subject: 735
Posted: 29 April 2007 at 12:19pm

4 sounds about right, neither too early or too late.

]]> Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:19:21 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=735&PID=129667#129667