Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Top 10 Ratings http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Cricket World Ratings : Top 10 Ratings Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:13:39 +0000 Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:00:42 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.71 360 www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2158 Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_images/logo.png http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ Top 10 Ratings : Originally posted by DRAVID... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=76484#76484 Author: mAni_paKi
Subject: 2158
Posted: 17 August 2006 at 10:00pm

Originally posted by DRAVID FAN

I think it does go down. Dravid came from rank 5 to rank 2 without playing a game because everybody above him performed badly.


if every one performed badly previously then Dravid should think now bcz every one is performing well now a dayz.]]> Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:00:42 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=76484#76484 Top 10 Ratings : Younis khan has also gained no.3... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=76483#76483 Author: mAni_paKi
Subject: 2158
Posted: 17 August 2006 at 9:58pm

Younis khan has also gained no.3 Spot in ICC rankings.]]> Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:58:38 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=76483#76483 Top 10 Ratings : well,Muhammad Yousef has scored... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=76482#76482 Author: mAni_paKi
Subject: 2158
Posted: 17 August 2006 at 9:57pm

well,Muhammad Yousef has scored 1000 runs in year 2006.Lets see wat kinda response did he get frm ICC ranking.]]> Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:57:49 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=76482#76482 Top 10 Ratings : I think it does go down. Dravid... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=76467#76467 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 17 August 2006 at 6:38pm

I think it does go down. Dravid came from rank 5 to rank 2 without playing a game because everybody above him performed badly.]]> Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:38:51 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=76467#76467 Top 10 Ratings : Originally posted by DRAVID... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74995#74995 Author: Wal Bada
Subject: 2158
Posted: 12 August 2006 at 6:02pm

Originally posted by DRAVID FAN

The ratings increase when you give good performances. If Dravid makes 250 or 300 against Australia, his Rating will shoot up, but at the same time if he scores 300 against Bangladesh then it won't go up as fast. Ponting has scored many hundreds and very qucikly especially against good opponents so his rating kept shooting up. Bradman was always good so his Rating is the highest. I think the SYSTEM is of good quality and and well planned. If Ponting now starts to play real bad then his Ratig will slowly go down and he will soon be out of the list. Its as you said Clapo. These 11 are some of the best in top form.


You are uttering blasphemus. It will never happen as this records the best ever performance by Ponting.It will remain as 937. he can only better it']]> Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:02:24 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74995#74995 Top 10 Ratings : Originally posted by DRAVID... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74993#74993 Author: Wal Bada
Subject: 2158
Posted: 12 August 2006 at 6:00pm

Originally posted by DRAVID FAN

Originally posted by Wal Bada

I think you guys can't understand the difference between performance in a point of time and performance during a career. And above stats are for a point of time. Lot of players can have very bright season or two, but truely great ones ahave many good seasons.

I think this thread needs to be locked as it is not making any sense.


Ponting has been performing phenomenally in the past seasons. 14 Tests 7-9 hundreds.Obviously his ratings will go up and he landed up here. Once he performes badly in 2 or 3 Tests it will automaticly go down or maybe Dravid will over take him as he is ranked 2. Hayden. I don't know how he came up there. Its like they didn't know who to put so they randomly picked a player out of the ones in form. In the Test ratings Dravid is 2nd so they should have put him in place. I hope you are editing or planning to regularly post the new ratings Clapo.That way taleast this thread will go on.


This is the highest ever rating on individual has got in his career. Obviously a superlative performance will get any one in that list, and by then the palyer will be long since noticed before we look at this ratings]]> Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:00:12 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74993#74993 Top 10 Ratings : The ratings increase when you... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74576#74576 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 10 August 2006 at 6:22pm

The ratings increase when you give good performances. If Dravid makes 250 or 300 against Australia, his Rating will shoot up, but at the same time if he scores 300 against Bangladesh then it won't go up as fast. Ponting has scored many hundreds and very qucikly especially against good opponents so his rating kept shooting up. Bradman was always good so his Rating is the highest. I think the SYSTEM is of good quality and and well planned. If Ponting now starts to play real bad then his Ratig will slowly go down and he will soon be out of the list. Its as you said Clapo. These 11 are some of the best in top form.]]> Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:22:57 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74576#74576 Top 10 Ratings : Dravid Fan if you took any notice... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74511#74511 Author: Clapo
Subject: 2158
Posted: 10 August 2006 at 2:09pm

Dravid Fan if you took any notice there will be no need to regularly update them as very rarely do we see a batsmen reach the heights that they have above!!!!

sledger could you please lock this thread as it seems no-one understands the question i posed, and it seems pointless trying to explain (i as already have twice) as no-one takes any notice!!!

]]> Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:09:19 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74511#74511 Top 10 Ratings : Originally posted by Wal BadaI... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74325#74325 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 09 August 2006 at 10:03pm

Originally posted by Wal Bada

I think you guys can't understand the difference between performance in a point of time and performance during a career. And above stats are for a point of time. Lot of players can have very bright season or two, but truely great ones ahave many good seasons.

I think this thread needs to be locked as it is not making any sense.


Ponting has been performing phenomenally in the past seasons. 14 Tests 7-9 hundreds.Obviously his ratings will go up and he landed up here. Once he performes badly in 2 or 3 Tests it will automaticly go down or maybe Dravid will over take him as he is ranked 2. Hayden. I don't know how he came up there. Its like they didn't know who to put so they randomly picked a player out of the ones in form. In the Test ratings Dravid is 2nd so they should have put him in place. I hope you are editing or planning to regularly post the new ratings Clapo.That way taleast this thread will go on.]]> Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:03:21 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74325#74325 Top 10 Ratings : I agree, but this one is going... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74323#74323 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 09 August 2006 at 9:59pm

I agree, but this one is going crazy. ]]> Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:59:13 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74323#74323 Top 10 Ratings : It seems nearly every newly started... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74301#74301 Author: TCA123
Subject: 2158
Posted: 09 August 2006 at 9:31pm

It seems nearly every newly started thread is locked ]]> Wed, 09 Aug 2006 21:31:01 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74301#74301 Top 10 Ratings : I think you guys can't understand... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74185#74185 Author: Wal Bada
Subject: 2158
Posted: 09 August 2006 at 1:48pm

I think you guys can't understand the difference between performance in a point of time and performance during a career. And above stats are for a point of time. Lot of players can have very bright season or two, but truely great ones ahave many good seasons.

I think this thread needs to be locked as it is not making any sense.]]> Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:48:34 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=74185#74185 Top 10 Ratings : Thats what I have been saying... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=73972#73972 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 08 August 2006 at 6:18pm

Thats what I have been saying all this time.]]> Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:18:55 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=73972#73972 Top 10 Ratings : Originally posted by DRAVID... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=73790#73790 Author: Sureshot
Subject: 2158
Posted: 08 August 2006 at 3:23pm

Originally posted by DRAVID FAN

Ponting being there is okay. But Hayden?!!! Why the hell is he there. He isn't even that great compared to the players up there. Nor is Ponting but his forms been really good so its okay. This is seriously crap.


It's all to do with statistics it has naff all to do with the players ability. The ratings are based on stats not the players ability.
]]> Tue, 08 Aug 2006 15:23:54 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=73790#73790 Top 10 Ratings : I know how it works. If you score... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=72060#72060 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 02 August 2006 at 5:49pm

I know how it works. If you score a 100 or 200 against a good team then your rating goes up faster, but if you score that many runs against a lower ranked team then your rankings increase slower. Same for the rankings of the teams.]]> Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:49:50 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=72060#72060 Top 10 Ratings : Originally posted by clapoBackFootMaster... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=72027#72027 Author: spin wizard
Subject: 2158
Posted: 02 August 2006 at 3:55pm

Originally posted by clapo

BackFootMaster and spin those ratings are for Test Matches only!!!

Oh dear !! my bad. Anyways , I still ain't going easy on the ICC still.

Originally posted by clapo

Pontings Rating is so high purely because of the weight of runs he scored in such a short period of time.

Hayden is in the same boat, during his rich veign of form in 01/02 he piled on the runs, leaving everyone in his wake. If not then the ICC are justified are they not ???

but i'm trying to find an explanation as to how they work....

Its quite predictable clapo , just look at how I edit you last post and you will know.

 

]]> Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:55:49 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=72027#72027 Top 10 Ratings : This is best ever Performances It... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=72019#72019 Author: Wal Bada
Subject: 2158
Posted: 02 August 2006 at 3:34pm

This is best ever Performances
It does not show the best ever Careers
These were for only a tome period of one series. But I don't know why is Lara's 688 runs in 6 iins against SL is not included (WI lost 3-0)]]> Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:34:01 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=72019#72019 Top 10 Ratings : Thank God Sachin is not there... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71893#71893 Author: dips_december
Subject: 2158
Posted: 02 August 2006 at 5:16am

Thank God Sachin is not there but Hayden I doubt whether these are the real ICC ratings or ICC Ratings by Kiran More ]]> Wed, 02 Aug 2006 05:16:05 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71893#71893 Top 10 Ratings : BackFootMaster and spin those... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71875#71875 Author: Clapo
Subject: 2158
Posted: 02 August 2006 at 1:46am

BackFootMaster and spin those ratings are for Test Matches only!!!

Pontings Rating is so high purely because of the weight of runs he scored in such a short period of time. Sachin and Lara have scored more runs, but, at any stage in their career, have they piled on as many runs as ponting did in such short period of time ???

Hayden is in the same boat, during his rich veign of form in 01/02 he piled on the runs, leaving everyone in his wake. Again, has Lara or Sachin ever scored as many runs as Hayden in that same period of time ???

If not then the ICC are justified are they not ???

I'm not saying they are correct as ranking players by runs alone isn't accurate, but i'm trying to find an explanation as to how they work.

 

 



Edited by Clapo]]> Wed, 02 Aug 2006 01:46:20 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71875#71875 Top 10 Ratings : Icc rating is nothing but crap.... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71797#71797 Author: BackFoot Master
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 5:46pm

Icc rating is nothing but crap. How an earth is Hayden on that list, Sachin surely should of been on this List. Hayden Odi stats ain't no way close to Sachin but the test stats are close. Hayden got good in the last 10 years but he didn't deserve to be in that list. Ponting is okay, great records in both form of the games.

 I really wounder if it's kingergarden Students who put together this list with Hayden in it. Icc needs serious help.

]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:46:34 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71797#71797 Top 10 Ratings : Ponting being there is okay. But... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71759#71759 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 4:11pm

Ponting being there is okay. But Hayden?!!! Why the hell is he there. He isn't even that great compared to the players up there. Nor is Ponting but his forms been really good so its okay. This is seriously crap.]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:11:13 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71759#71759 Top 10 Ratings : ICC ratings are crap to me. They... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71751#71751 Author: spin wizard
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 4:03pm

ICC ratings are crap to me. They just go on form. Now look at the ratings

1

D. BradmanAUS961 v India, 06/02/1948

2

L. HuttonENG945 v West Indies, 30/03/1954

3

J. HobbsENG942 v South Africa, 13/12/1913

4

P. MayENG941 v Australia, 23/08/1956

5

G. SobersWI938 v India, 13/01/1967

5

C. WalcottWI938 v Australia, 11/06/1955

5

V. RichardsWI938 v England, 27/03/1981

8

R. PontingAUS937 v South Africa, 24/03/2006

9

M. HaydenAUS935 v England, 07/11/2002

10

E. WeekesWI927 v New Zealand, 03/03/1956

10

G. PollockSA927 v Australia, 19/02/1970

Why is ponting and Hayden there and no Tendulkar who has lit the world up in both ODI's & Test. Clobber was right...... The ICC - Bungling.

]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:03:49 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71751#71751 Top 10 Ratings : Thats what I am saying. It'll... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71726#71726 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 3:22pm

Thats what I am saying. It'll change only if one of the current players start improving or start failing to deliver.]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:22:48 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71726#71726 Top 10 Ratings : Dravid fan those top 10 won't... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71724#71724 Author: Clapo
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 3:20pm

Dravid fan those top 10 won't change unless someone acheives a rating higher than them, pontings has already dropped below the 937 he had against SA in sydney.

]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:20:46 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71724#71724 Top 10 Ratings : Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLEOh... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71719#71719 Author: Sledger
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 3:13pm

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE

Oh he played 66 tests with a batting average of 46 and a highest test score of 285*,sorry ill search better next time.


No helmets , uncovered pitches , pretty good average huh! ]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:13:42 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71719#71719 Top 10 Ratings : It'll have to keep changing.... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71690#71690 Author: DRAVID FAN
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 2:46pm

It'll have to keep changing. If Ponting fails to deliver in his next couple of Tests his ratings automatically go down.]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:46:55 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71690#71690 Top 10 Ratings : doesn't sound to me as if... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71684#71684 Author: Clapo
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 2:32pm

doesn't sound to me as if you know what you are disagreeing with them on, the ratings are given for their performances, or their run of performances]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:32:10 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71684#71684 Top 10 Ratings : Originally posted by ClapoAK... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71683#71683 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 2:16pm

Originally posted by Clapo

AK its not a list of the top 10 batsmen of all time, if you took notice, you would see its a list of the "top 10 RATINGS" given by the ICC.

I know that the ICC all time top 10 I disagree with them.

]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:16:48 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71683#71683 Top 10 Ratings : Oh he played 66 tests with a batting... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71682#71682 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 2:16pm

Oh he played 66 tests with a batting average of 46 and a highest test score of 285*,sorry ill search better next time.]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:16:07 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71682#71682 Top 10 Ratings : AK its not a list of the top 10... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71681#71681 Author: Clapo
Subject: 2158
Posted: 01 August 2006 at 2:14pm

AK its not a list of the top 10 batsmen of all time, if you took notice, you would see its a list of the "top 10 RATINGS" given by the ICC.]]> Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:14:20 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2158&PID=71681#71681