Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Warne v MacGill http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Cricket World Ratings : Warne v MacGill Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 20 May 2013 16:51:12 +0000 Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:02:05 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.71 360 www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1628 Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_images/logo.png http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ Warne v MacGill : Warne by a street the reason why... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=184349#184349 Author: widdleman
Subject: 1628
Posted: 27 July 2008 at 1:02pm

Warne by a street the reason why McGill got so many wickets was because of the Warne factor, the mystisim surrounding leg spinners McGill had 2 deliveries a leg break and a googly as where Warne had them all.]]> Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:02:05 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=184349#184349 Warne v MacGill : sorry quicky, i was just stating... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=47653#47653 Author: darlo_lad
Subject: 1628
Posted: 01 May 2006 at 11:11am

sorry quicky, i was just stating that the two topics are quite similar. No need to get so defensive]]> Mon, 01 May 2006 11:11:03 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=47653#47653 Warne v MacGill : darlo_las read wot i just said... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=47601#47601 Author: quicky
Subject: 1628
Posted: 30 April 2006 at 11:14pm

darlo_las read wot i just said ffs, i am asking how successful macgill would have been if it werent for warne not who is the better leggie, just coz the title involves the same men doesnt mean it is the same thread]]> Sun, 30 Apr 2006 23:14:26 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=47601#47601 Warne v MacGill : Sorry "darling", but... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46944#46944 Author: darlo_lad
Subject: 1628
Posted: 29 April 2006 at 10:35am

Sorry "darling", but if you read the topic you will see it is clearly about Warne and McGill.]]> Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:35:28 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46944#46944 Warne v MacGill : now now darling i was just trying... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46803#46803 Author: quicky
Subject: 1628
Posted: 28 April 2006 at 10:34pm

now now darling i was just trying to narrow it down to just these 2 if that is ok the other one involves all the leggies i am asking about how successfull macgill would have been if it werent for shane warne]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:34:42 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46803#46803 Warne v MacGill : There is a topic about better... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46482#46482 Author: darlo_lad
Subject: 1628
Posted: 28 April 2006 at 10:58am

There is a topic about better leggie, which has this exact same idea of Warne vs McGill.]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:58:23 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46482#46482 Warne v MacGill : Originally posted by -JP- Originally... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46401#46401 Author: mazzybabe.uk
Subject: 1628
Posted: 28 April 2006 at 8:19am

Originally posted by -JP-

Originally posted by darlo_lad

OK this has already been posted about please read forum before posting a new topic

Strange as it may seem, we don't appear to have any open Warne v MacGill threads, so this one can stay it is. I'll change the thread title though.

Isn't there a  better leggie topic I know because I put about a 5 page long post in there

]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:19:18 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46401#46401 Warne v MacGill : MacGill is a class leg spinner... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46381#46381 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1628
Posted: 28 April 2006 at 6:45am

MacGill is a class leg spinner and very unlucky not to play more tests]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:45:47 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46381#46381 Warne v MacGill : http://www.cricketworld.com/fo... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46362#46362 Author: crownmethod
Subject: 1628
Posted: 28 April 2006 at 3:58am

http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1397&a mp;PN=1

]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:58:22 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46362#46362 Warne v MacGill : Originally posted by darlo_ladOK... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46352#46352 Author: -JP-
Subject: 1628
Posted: 28 April 2006 at 12:44am

Originally posted by darlo_lad

OK this has already been posted about please read forum before posting a new topic

Strange as it may seem, we don't appear to have any open Warne v MacGill threads, so this one can stay it is. I'll change the thread title though.

]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:44:50 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46352#46352 Warne v MacGill : Warne way more succesful and the... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46350#46350 Author: cricket_mstr
Subject: 1628
Posted: 28 April 2006 at 12:27am

Warne way more succesful and the better bowler.

Warne is way more smarter in his bowling than MacGil, and I don't think MacGil is as liked amongst the team as Warney

 

]]> Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:27:57 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46350#46350 Warne v MacGill : OK this has already been posted... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46248#46248 Author: darlo_lad
Subject: 1628
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 10:45pm

OK this has already been posted about please read forum before posting a new topic]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:45:01 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46248#46248 Warne v MacGill : both these spinners are top class... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46223#46223 Author: quicky
Subject: 1628
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 9:58pm

both these spinners are top class and i know you can say shane is the better spinner and i would just have to look at one of his 5 wicket hauls to see but i think stuart macgill could have been as good as warne if it werent for warne if you get what i mean. If stuart played for any other team he would have 500+ wickets easily but because and only because he plays for aus he has 200. Every time he plays along side warne he seems to get more wickets than him in a match what do you guys think about macgill]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:58:40 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628&PID=46223#46223