Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : who is Better? http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket : Cricket World Ratings : who is Better? Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Tue, 21 May 2013 06:33:11 +0000 Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:25:03 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.71 360 www.cricketworld.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=1580 Cricket Forum | Cricket Discussion Forum | Cricket http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_images/logo.png http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/ who is Better? : You cant compare Hayden with this... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=182070#182070 Author: Jacob Oram Fan
Subject: 1580
Posted: 14 June 2008 at 6:25pm

You cant compare Hayden with this mediocricy chief.]]> Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:25:03 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=182070#182070 who is Better? : I think Hayden should be kept... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=62963#62963 Author: slogger72N/O
Subject: 1580
Posted: 25 June 2006 at 12:38pm

I think Hayden should be kept in the squad for another year or so, before he finall steps down.]]> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 12:38:41 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=62963#62963 who is Better? : Originally posted by wcccno... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=59998#59998 Author: dips_december
Subject: 1580
Posted: 14 June 2006 at 1:45pm

Originally posted by wccc

no way dips

what no way he has done it for so many years and one bad series does not mean he should be dropped ]]> Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:45:26 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=59998#59998 who is Better? : Hayden is better, but he won't... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=59876#59876 Author: slogger72N/O
Subject: 1580
Posted: 14 June 2006 at 7:17am

Hayden is better, but he won't be around forever so Australia have to look into the future]]> Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:17:24 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=59876#59876 who is Better? : The right mans winning! http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=54714#54714 Author: Top Cat
Subject: 1580
Posted: 26 May 2006 at 7:05pm

The right mans winning!]]> Fri, 26 May 2006 19:05:09 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=54714#54714 who is Better? : a great player especially for... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=54141#54141 Author: wccc
Subject: 1580
Posted: 24 May 2006 at 9:30pm

a great player especially for an aussie]]> Wed, 24 May 2006 21:30:47 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=54141#54141 who is Better? : No way Jacques is the best http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=54133#54133 Author: Top Cat
Subject: 1580
Posted: 24 May 2006 at 8:39pm

No way Jacques is the best]]> Wed, 24 May 2006 20:39:25 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=54133#54133 who is Better? : no way dips http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=54083#54083 Author: wccc
Subject: 1580
Posted: 24 May 2006 at 5:20pm

no way dips]]> Wed, 24 May 2006 17:20:09 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=54083#54083 who is Better? : I forgot that i made such a post... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53705#53705 Author: dips_december
Subject: 1580
Posted: 23 May 2006 at 9:45am

I forgot that i made such a post ,Hayden far better than Jaques]]> Tue, 23 May 2006 09:45:42 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53705#53705 who is Better? : That was a quick century he got.... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53644#53644 Author: cricket_mstr
Subject: 1580
Posted: 23 May 2006 at 4:01am

That was a quick century he got. Off around 70 balls with 14 fours

]]> Tue, 23 May 2006 04:01:22 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53644#53644 who is Better? : yeah http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53591#53591 Author: wccc
Subject: 1580
Posted: 22 May 2006 at 8:41pm

yeah]]> Mon, 22 May 2006 20:41:10 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53591#53591 who is Better? : Next centuries for jaques! V... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53579#53579 Author: Top Cat
Subject: 1580
Posted: 22 May 2006 at 8:24pm

Next centuries for jaques!

V Glamorgan

V Northants

V Derbyshire

]]> Mon, 22 May 2006 20:24:34 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53579#53579 who is Better? : jaques because hes great for getting... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53526#53526 Author: wccc
Subject: 1580
Posted: 22 May 2006 at 4:47pm

jaques because hes great for getting quick runs

example vs. surrey

]]> Mon, 22 May 2006 16:47:02 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=53526#53526 who is Better? : i think its hayden because of... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=51306#51306 Author: razzaq_fan
Subject: 1580
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 5:34pm

i think its hayden because of his experience and he has proven time and time again that he can bat the man is a class act.]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 17:34:01 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=51306#51306 who is Better? : of course Mathew Hyden who can... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=51247#51247 Author: zaikpioneer
Subject: 1580
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 12:29pm

of course Mathew Hyden who can forget his century against Pakistan in nerobi 144]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 12:29:37 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=51247#51247 who is Better? : In my opinion it is jaques, http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=51220#51220 Author: Top Cat
Subject: 1580
Posted: 13 May 2006 at 11:01am

In my opinion it is jaques,]]> Sat, 13 May 2006 11:01:23 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=51220#51220 who is Better? : There is no way Katich is better... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46137#46137 Author: cricket_mstr
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 1:53pm

There is no way Katich is better than a David Hussey or Brad Hodge, Katich is one of the players who did pathetic in the last 4 tests of the 05 Ashes

Katich will get slaughtered in the World Cup, Australia can't ignore the fact that there is a Gilchrist equal in Phil Jaques. Watching him bat in Bangladesh was awesome, all he needs is to get rid of those early game jitters.

Jaques should be in the ODI side against Bangladesh, get him some experience

 

 

]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:53:23 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46137#46137 who is Better? : Katich is the most conservative... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46119#46119 Author: mazzybabe.uk
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 1:06pm

Katich is the most conservative and he frequently rescued Australia in the Ashes get him in get Martyn out. Get him out of the odi side though far to slow  like I said Hussey to open free up a space in the middle order and Australia have many a middle order batsmen. Maybe Watson could get his place back. Who knows the options are limitless ]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:06:14 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46119#46119 who is Better? : Katich being dropped in my opinion... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46100#46100 Author: darlo_lad
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 12:24pm

Katich being dropped in my opinion was due to the likes of Hussey and co doing a great job. He is a great player, but would you not rather have Hussey in your side?]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:24:55 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46100#46100 who is Better? : I cant see why Katich was dropped... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46058#46058 Author: eddyc_solid
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 11:31am

I cant see why Katich was dropped he has a very good record with an average of 37+ that is very decent.I personally think Langer is overated and is way past his best the selctors ahve stuck with him for far to long.]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:31:50 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46058#46058 who is Better? : well australia with or without... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46053#46053 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 11:24am

well australia with or without jaques wont score 500 is that clear]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:24:47 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46053#46053 who is Better? : Australia will NOT make 500 if... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46047#46047 Author: crownmethod
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 11:19am

Australia will NOT make 500 if they don't have Jaques.

Australia will MAKE 500 if they have Jaques in their team(and all the other members of the Australian team)

There, that clears everything up doesn't it? Because I don't understand the rubblish you are saying.

]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:19:38 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46047#46047 who is Better? : it pretty much means that you... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46042#46042 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 11:07am

it pretty much means that you think they'll make 500 with or without jaques and thats not gonna happen ask anyone if thats possible and they'll say no

]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:07:18 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46042#46042 who is Better? : I think Jaques. http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46040#46040 Author: dhonifan
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 11:04am

I think Jaques.]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:04:26 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46040#46040 who is Better? : 'them' meaning Australia,... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46036#46036 Author: crownmethod
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 11:00am

'them' meaning Australia, not Jaques and Gilchrist. With the support of Ponting, Hussey, Symonds, Martyn and Clarke.]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:00:12 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46036#46036 who is Better? : then what do you expect them to... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46034#46034 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 10:52am

then what do you expect them to make

]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:52:38 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46034#46034 who is Better? : I can say that your English is... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46030#46030 Author: crownmethod
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 10:47am

I can say that your English is really bad. I did not say that Gilchrist and Jacques will last 50 overs. If you read carefully in this sentence: If Jaques batted with Gilly, I can guarantee you that Australia will score 500 in a one-day match. That does not mean Gilchrist and Jacques will last 50 overs and score 250 each.



Edited by crownmethod]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:47:49 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46030#46030 who is Better? : that is a load of rubbish and... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46029#46029 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 10:44am

that is a load of  rubbish and you expect them to last 50 overs togethern both scoring 250,jaques is not as aggresive as gilchrist]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:44:56 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46029#46029 who is Better? : Jaques is a scores faster than... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46027#46027 Author: crownmethod
Subject: 1580
Posted: 27 April 2006 at 10:38am

Jaques is a scores faster than both Hayden and Katich. Hayden is capable of scoring bigger scores than Jacques(but does not score faster than Jacques) , but like I said earlier Hayden is getting too old! So it would have to be Jaques! Jaques is like another Adam Gilchrist! So Jaqcues would have to bat with Gilly. If Jaques batted with Gilly, I can guarantee you that Australia will score 500 in a one-day match.]]> Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:38:56 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=46027#46027 who is Better? : Okay i'm sorry,but what's... http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=45421#45421 Author: ANIL KUMBLE
Subject: 1580
Posted: 25 April 2006 at 1:56pm

Okay i'm sorry,but what's wrong with my english

]]> Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:56:33 +0000 http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1580&PID=45421#45421