Andrew Symonds

ntini was bowling very well and was getting it to move alot, any player should have had diffulculties but he got himself in a hole by always going across and getting stuck on the crease.

If u look at his record lbw isn't his most often dismisall so that explains how different his playing.

andrew symonds is a legend    not a good test player did any of u guys see that 150!!!

What was said earlier was right, a true all rounder will be in a side for either their batting or bowling. Symonds is more than capable in ODIs in the batting side of things, and his fielding has to be worth 10 runs a game, and his multidimentional bowling is another asset to his limited overs game. In the test arena however, Australia are blessed with so much talent that players like Roy find it had to cement a place in the side because there is always pressure on the from other players. As far as a test all rounder goes, I dont think Symonds could hold a place as a straight batsman or bowler, but he provides another side with his fielding it must not be forgotten. Say Australia field for 180 overs in a test, I have already said he would save 10 runs a game on a ODI, so in 180 over he may be saving 30-40 runs in the field. Add this onto his batting and his bowling and suddenly it looks alot better. Also the Australian team also speaks so highly of him when he does come into a team, they always say he lifts the team with his sense of humour.

Injured or not, Watson is pretty ordinary compare to the other Aussie boys!