| Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
bondy
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 10 December 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4976
|
Topic: Bangladesh in NewZealand Posted: 08 January 2008 at 8:33am |
|
Even Vettori admitted that the England series has been on his mind while playing Bangladesh! Its not ideal preparation but at least it will get the boys confidence up!
NZ have to improve from their performance when they were last in England. Bond broke down as did the rest of the team and a part from a strong initial partnership between Richardson and Fleming, NZ were out-played through and through.
|
|
Good one Graham!
|
 |
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2139
|
Posted: 09 January 2008 at 9:13pm |
Vettori seemed adament that he wanted a stronger performance from his bowlers. To be perfectly honest, some changes will have to be made if they intend to dent the England top order e.g. - dropping O'brien.
|
|
Warriors!!
|
 |
bondy
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 10 December 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4976
|
Posted: 09 January 2008 at 10:43pm |
|
O'Brien bowled better than Mills throughout the first test Sam!
|
|
Good one Graham!
|
 |
NZ_Fast
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 21 August 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1928
|
Posted: 10 January 2008 at 4:55am |
|
Pretty sad indictment on the state of New Zealand cricket that, when o'brian out bowls anyone.
|
 |
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2139
|
Posted: 10 January 2008 at 10:50pm |
|
Yeah hes useless. I cant believe Cumming has been included in the squad for the second test! Without fail he seems to get out within the first 5 overs. NZ pretty much start off with two wickets down - Chris Martin and Craig 'useless' Cumming.
|
|
Warriors!!
|
 |
NZ_Fast
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 21 August 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1928
|
Posted: 11 January 2008 at 12:03am |
|
I think Martin would take offence being labeled as useless as cumming. In the past i've backed cumming because he's a scrapper, but when you have 2 failures against bangladesh...it forced me to change my mind.
|
 |
bondy
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 10 December 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4976
|
Posted: 11 January 2008 at 12:28am |
How needs to be in the team to get some time playing test cricket before the series against England too. If Cumming does play and they pick How for the England series then they've made a dumb mistake.
|
|
Good one Graham!
|
 |
cricketluva
Square Leg
Joined: 09 April 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 432
|
Posted: 11 January 2008 at 1:52am |
|
NZ could borrow some Aussie quicks. We have a whole lot who are probably test class who can't get a game.
|
|
See you later Gilly! Thanks for the memories!
|
 |
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2139
|
Posted: 11 January 2008 at 2:15am |
|
|
|
Warriors!!
|
 |
bondy
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 10 December 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4976
|
Posted: 11 January 2008 at 4:05am |
|
he's certainly one, the best in domestic cricket last season by a country mile!
|
|
Good one Graham!
|
 |
joelza1990
Square Leg
Joined: 06 January 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 397
|
Posted: 12 January 2008 at 12:44am |
|
Bangladesh for not the first time in trouble at the lunch break at 86/5. NZ would be looking to knock them over for less than 150 at this stage and pretty much do the same thing South Africa did to the Windies if there batting can put in consistent effort right through the order.
|
 |
joelza1990
Square Leg
Joined: 06 January 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 397
|
Posted: 12 January 2008 at 2:05am |
|
My thoughts were pretty much correct Bangladesh bundled out for 143 leaving NZ in another fantastic position. Now as i said before they need to knuckle down with the bat especially the top order who looked a bit vunerable in the 1st test.
|
 |
bondy
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 10 December 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4976
|
Posted: 12 January 2008 at 2:18am |
|
yes, both Cumming and Fulton failed to get to 20, yet Fulton looked good in making a quick-fire 14. All eyes are in Fleming though, as he looks to complete his first ever century at the Basin Reserve.
|
|
Good one Graham!
|
 |
canadiancricket
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 26 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1271
|
Posted: 12 January 2008 at 2:44am |
|
Bangladesh really needs to sort out their batting. They need to find something in between defense and attack. Either they get into shell or sometimes they over attack. Ashraful is definitely not doing his reputation any good. He has a lot of talent but those moments of brilliance are very less. Aftab is certainly the worst batsman I have seen. He simply doesn't know his role in the batting line up. He doesn't know what approach to take. Their openers are definitely showing how inconsistent their whole batting his. Martin was brilliant. He should definitely be in the one day squad too.
|
 |
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2139
|
Posted: 12 January 2008 at 3:07am |
Originally posted by bondy
yes, both Cumming and Fulton failed to get to 20, yet Fulton looked good in making a quick-fire 14. All eyes are in Fleming though, as he looks to complete his first ever century at the Basin Reserve. |
Bells the only one whos out??
|
|
Warriors!!
|
 |
canadiancricket
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 26 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1271
|
Posted: 12 January 2008 at 3:09am |
|
he was talking about the first test.
|
 |
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2139
|
Posted: 12 January 2008 at 3:28am |
|
Oh right. Anyway, Fulton is out now.
|
|
Warriors!!
|
 |
NZ_Fast
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 21 August 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1928
|
Posted: 12 January 2008 at 6:56am |
|
I was to busy actually playing cricket to see/hear any of the game but from what i've been told, Fulton was a bit unlucky to be LBW, though Ashraful was unlucky to be given out so i guess its only fair.
|
 |
joelza1990
Square Leg
Joined: 06 January 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 397
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 1:05am |
|
So Flemings thrown away a great chance at a century holding out at deep mid wicket for 87. I don't NZ will be overly happy with the scorecard 244/6 players getting starts and not going on.
|
 |
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2139
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 1:24am |
|
I was so angry about that, fleming should know better than to risk a big shot like that.
|
|
Warriors!!
|
 |
joelza1990
Square Leg
Joined: 06 January 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 397
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 1:37am |
|
gee the scoring rate has really picked i assumed it was McCullum who had picked things up, but it's the skipper 37 off 28!
|
 |
NZ_Fast
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 21 August 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1928
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 4:08am |
|
Its not really good enough that no one, let alone someone from the top order didn't get a 100. Fleming really should have pressed on instead of being an idiot and getting out like that. For me Cumming has to go now, his 42 was ugly and to be honest he looked uncoordinated. Bangladesh were dreadfully behind the over rate, 1.5 hours max play left today and still 24 overs to bowl. With a lead of 250 though, and a batsmen down with one of the openers breaking a thumb i expect an easy innings win.
|
 |
bondy
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 10 December 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4976
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 4:41am |
You're right there NZ Fast, the top order once again failed to impress and that's the second time we've been bowled out, which is simply not good enough from the 6 best batsman in the country, supposedly.
Fleming had a good opportunity to kick on and his frustration indicated that he knew it too. Fulton started well and failed again. Sinclair had about 10 catches dropped and was lucky to get to 47- chances are Styris will be back in the mix for the following test centuries given his domestic form of late.
Bangladesh did bowl well today and deserved the wickets they got. It could've been a lot worse for NZ if the catches had stuck, and again it was left to the middle-lower order to do the damage. Oram and Bell can also consider themselves unlucky as both got clangers from the umpires!!! Technology.....bring it on!!!
|
|
Good one Graham!
|
 |
canadiancricket
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 26 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1271
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 4:53am |
|
The bad decisions are just increasing mate. Technology will come eventually if bad decisions don't stop. I expect them to continue at a healthy rate. Umpires these days just don't seem professional now. You cannot trust them anymore. Well I can't. Sinclair dissapointed me. He got so many centuries. Any batsman would have fancied his chances of a century after so much luck. Vettori is turning into a batsman now. His innings was spectacular. Shame he missed out on a century.
|
 |
canadiancricket
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 26 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1271
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 4:54am |
|
Bangladesh already 3 down. They have been very disappointing to say the least. I was expecting a bit more from them. All this even when bond is absent. Just imagine what would have happened if bond was there. They would be lucky to cross even 100 once.
|
 |
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2139
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 6:10am |
NZ should be able to wrap it up tomorrow, looks as if the Bangladeshi batting is going to fail yet again. Also, Cumming has to go!! Bring in How!
|
|
Warriors!!
|
 |
cricketluva
Square Leg
Joined: 09 April 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 432
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 9:07am |
Originally posted by canadiancricket
I was expecting a bit more from them. |
Is that meant to be a joke? 
|
|
See you later Gilly! Thanks for the memories!
|
 |
canadiancricket
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 26 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1271
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 10:18am |
Originally posted by cricketluva
Originally posted by canadiancricket
I was expecting a bit more from them. |
Is that meant to be a joke?  |
No it's not. They are way more capable than they showed. I think it was in 2006 when they came close to winning a test against Australia and on numerous occasions they have done quite well. Just how Tamim and Siddique played in the first test showed what they are capable of.
|
 |
samhache
Opener
Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2139
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 8:29pm |
|
Tamim looks very promising as a future batsman, just how close were they to beating Australia?? Their test record is abysmal, isn't only one win out of 40ish attempts?
|
|
Warriors!!
|
 |
canadiancricket
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 26 September 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1271
|
Posted: 13 January 2008 at 9:03pm |
|
well sam they have a first innings lead of 150 or so but then played badly in the second dig. They had Aus at 6 for 231 in second innings too with 70 needed to win but Ponting made a brilliant century. They could have won had they held Ponting's catch with only 2 tail enders and the bowlers bowling well. But their fielding standards let them down badly. Pretty close for me according to Banglas standards. Lee held fort at other end otherwise only the tail was remaining.
Edited by canadiancricket - 13 January 2008 at 9:04pm
|
 |