Forum Home Forum Home » Let's Talk Cricket » General Cricket Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: best all-rounder?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedbest all-rounder?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
anilkumarbpl View Drop Down
12th Man
12th Man


Joined: 22 November 2005
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
Direct Link To This Post Topic: best all-rounder?
    Posted: 23 November 2005 at 4:52am
Kallis and Flintoff are considered as the best allrounders.
But Michael Clarke also seems to be an upcoming allrounder.

Edited by anilkumarbpl
Anil Kumar.B
Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 November 2005 at 10:43am
No way!

Flintoff and Kallis are the 2 best all-rounders today and Micheal Clarke is not an upcoming all-rounder. I don't know where people make that up from.
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
anilkumarbpl View Drop Down
12th Man
12th Man


Joined: 22 November 2005
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 November 2005 at 11:21am
But he outplayed many other Australian batsman against the best bowling attacks. He is a promising batsman and can be a handy bowler. He is very consistent and good rotator of strike. His fantstic century in his debut match against India proved this.
Anil Kumar.B
Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 November 2005 at 11:23am
He is not...not a good bowler but he does have batting talent. He is a batter. No one would call him an all-rounder.
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
-JP- View Drop Down
Manager
Manager
Avatar

Joined: 21 January 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6232
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 November 2005 at 11:26am

He wouldn't even call himself an all-rounder, he has a dodgy back so he hardly bowls at all now.

He didn't outplay his Australian counterparts against England, West Indies, or the World XI, so much so, that he's been dropped.

Australia already have a couple of all-rounders. Gilchrist, Watson, Symonds, for example.

Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 November 2005 at 11:33am
Exactly, he's been dropped, that's why he is such a great all-rounder. He sucks...he got dropped. Even his batting is out of form and there is no way that anyone would ever call his bowling good.
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.703 seconds.