Forum Home Forum Home » Let's Talk Cricket » Coaching
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Bowlers height?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Bowlers height?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Kerm View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 03 September 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1168
Post Options Post Options   Quote Kerm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Bowlers height?
    Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:31pm
I have just started putting alot of time and effort into some fast bowling. No idea what speed i'm bowling at but its not slow. Hoping to build on that and add in all the variations to prove that someone slightly less then 6ft is capable of it in England/Australia. Just out of interest how tall is Shane Bond, he is far from slow.
Kerm
Back to Top
jhj87 View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg


Joined: 01 January 2007
Location: Barbados
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 55
Post Options Post Options   Quote jhj87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 February 2007 at 11:56pm
shane bond is 6ft+, Kerm u may think u bowl quick but then u see a pro quick bowl, then u kno wot quick is. being tall as a qucik bowler has lots of advantages, u get more carry, u get more movement off the seam, ur yorkers are harder to play because the length is harder to read. but there have been many good short fast bowlers. darren gough is only 5.10 and so was malcolm marshall. if u are short you tend to skid the ball so pitch the ball up and swing it. smaller fast bowlers tend to have to be quicker to be succesful to try and rush batsman. im not tall but when i run in and try and hit the pitch hard i get very good carry and only bowl at 70mph.
Back to Top
Shane Warnabee View Drop Down
Square Leg
Square Leg
Avatar

Joined: 28 June 2006
Location: United Arab Emirates
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 401
Post Options Post Options   Quote Shane Warnabee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 February 2007 at 10:39am
is it possible to be really fast at a height of 5.1?
What goes around comes around!
Back to Top
Kerm View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 03 September 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1168
Post Options Post Options   Quote Kerm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 February 2007 at 1:10pm
Of course, the general conclusion I have come to however is that if your short, in that case really short, you have to rely on good technique and a slingy action. 
Kerm
Back to Top
W.G. View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 04 January 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1833
Post Options Post Options   Quote W.G. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 February 2007 at 9:47pm
Originally posted by Shane Warnabee

is it possible to be really fast at a height of 5.1?
Yes, but you'll never reach adult mags without assistance
When you win the toss - bat.
If you are in doubt, think about it - then bat. If you have very big doubts, consult a colleague - then bat.
Back to Top
RightHandBat View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar
The next best batsman

Joined: 27 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Post Options Post Options   Quote RightHandBat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 February 2007 at 11:07pm
If you're short, you should become a batsman and make good use of your 'levers' to get into position quickly when facing the bowler. You'd want a bowler to have longer arms than a batsman.
"His classical hits down the ground, met with a checked drive, were Tendulkar at his best. It was though he had a new lease of life." - Sachin Tendulkar's return to cricket with a 91-Ball century.
Back to Top
The CCC View Drop Down
Square Leg
Square Leg
Avatar

Joined: 23 January 2006
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 254
Post Options Post Options   Quote The CCC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2007 at 6:35pm
it's better to be small as a spin bowler because there will be more you can do with flight etc...
As a pacer, it's definite advantage to be tall (6ft+). Not only do you get more bounce and things like that but you can also scare the batsman silly.
CCC-Carcassonne Cricket Club

Support us, then play us!!!Second hand equipment etc highly welcomed!!!
Back to Top
jhj87 View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg


Joined: 01 January 2007
Location: Barbados
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 55
Post Options Post Options   Quote jhj87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2007 at 10:41pm
good point CCC but i think that if you are tall then you can still be a succesful spinner, like anil kumble, but you will never get the same flight so must rely on bounce. RightHandBat i think what you have said is rubbish. not many people are quality batsman, but even less are very quick bowlers, so if you can bowl quick, bowl! because you have a very rare talent. small batsman do not have gd levers. tall batsman have good levers, their longer arms allow them to create a larger arc when swinging the bat and hit the ball further.
Back to Top
Pietersen Fan View Drop Down
First Slip
First Slip
Avatar

Joined: 11 August 2006
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 924
Post Options Post Options   Quote Pietersen Fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2007 at 10:50pm
yeh but small batsmen are nightmares to bowl to because they can pul or cut anything thts even slightly off the floor
check out the ultimate spinners guide -   spinny.co.nr
Back to Top
jhj87 View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg


Joined: 01 January 2007
Location: Barbados
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 55
Post Options Post Options   Quote jhj87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2007 at 11:01pm
well a good length ball is the same to anyone, so they try and cut it and they have a huge chance of knicking it.
Back to Top
RightHandBat View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar
The next best batsman

Joined: 27 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Post Options Post Options   Quote RightHandBat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2007 at 11:05pm
Originally posted by jhj87

good point CCC but i think that if you are tall then you can still be a succesful spinner, like anil kumble, but you will never get the same flight so must rely on bounce. RightHandBat i think what you have said is rubbish. not many people are quality batsman, but even less are very quick bowlers, so if you can bowl quick, bowl! because you have a very rare talent. small batsman do not have gd levers. tall batsman have good levers, their longer arms allow them to create a larger arc when swinging the bat and hit the ball further.


Look at Sachin Tendulkar, or Don Bradman, or Lara, or Ponting, or Gavaskar. They're not even 1.8m, so I don't believe what I've said is rubbish. A batsman and bowler have different biomechanics, or whatever the word is.

You'd prefer a bowler to be taller, and have longer arms than a batsman. The Little Master Sachin is only 1.68m and he's always in position earlier than any other batsman, it's because of his short levers, and those short movements which he can use to his advantage to get into position quicker, therfore having more time when batting.
"His classical hits down the ground, met with a checked drive, were Tendulkar at his best. It was though he had a new lease of life." - Sachin Tendulkar's return to cricket with a 91-Ball century.
Back to Top
jhj87 View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg


Joined: 01 January 2007
Location: Barbados
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 55
Post Options Post Options   Quote jhj87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2007 at 11:08pm
kevin pietersen is a tall, so is andrew flintoff, so is alistair cook, so is graeme smith, kallis, gilchrist, symonds, white, hayden. small or tall doesnt really matter when your a batsman or a bowler really.
Back to Top
RightHandBat View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar
The next best batsman

Joined: 27 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
Post Options Post Options   Quote RightHandBat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2007 at 11:10pm
Usually those players who have brilliant technique and aren't really tall, like the ones I mentioned, those are the players who are in position earlier than anyone else and they have time to play their shots, thats what seperates good batsman from the great batsman.
"His classical hits down the ground, met with a checked drive, were Tendulkar at his best. It was though he had a new lease of life." - Sachin Tendulkar's return to cricket with a 91-Ball century.
Back to Top
jhj87 View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg


Joined: 01 January 2007
Location: Barbados
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 55
Post Options Post Options   Quote jhj87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2007 at 11:32pm
kevin pietersen looks like he has all the time in world to play his shots, who else whips balls a foot outside off and hits them square on the on side?
Back to Top
The CCC View Drop Down
Square Leg
Square Leg
Avatar

Joined: 23 January 2006
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 254
Post Options Post Options   Quote The CCC Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 February 2007 at 9:41pm
well...KP is different isn't he...
What RHB is saying is right in that smaller batsmen have less trouble deeling with line/length but taller batsmen do tend to be able to put more power in to their shots off the front foot (height increasing velocity of bat=ball goes further). Taller batsmen also have the adv of a longer reach. Mind, it can also be a disadvantage...
CCC-Carcassonne Cricket Club

Support us, then play us!!!Second hand equipment etc highly welcomed!!!
Back to Top
spin wizard View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
The world’s next great spinner

Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9453
Post Options Post Options   Quote spin wizard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 February 2007 at 9:54pm
Height can be a factor in those things but what makes you great is the natural talent that you have. Tendulkar's insticts are probably quicker than others and that's why it looks as if he has the world of time to hit a ball. Height doesn't really make you a better pacer but it gives you the advantage of bounce. Marshall was small but combines speed and swing. Kumble is tall and uses his high realease to generate steepling bounce. If you use what you've got, then you will become great!
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.859 seconds.