Forum Home Forum Home » Let's Talk Cricket » General Cricket Talk » Facts, Stats & Records
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Brett Lee’s Fastest Ball
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Brett Lee’s Fastest Ball

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Post Options Post Options   Quote saadadvanced7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Brett Lee’s Fastest Ball
    Posted: 30 December 2005 at 7:29pm
Guess what everybody. I just went to the Guiness World record book site and gave them these links. I said that the Shoaib Akhtar delivery wasn't the fastest ever but the Sami one was. I hope they will put the Sami delivery in the 2007 World record book.
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
Big Josh View Drop Down
Test Debutant
Test Debutant


Joined: 02 December 2005
Location: Zimbabwe
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 125
Post Options Post Options   Quote Big Josh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 January 2006 at 9:08pm
So what was the fastest delivery???
josh
Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Post Options Post Options   Quote saadadvanced7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 January 2006 at 10:28pm
According to the 2006 Guinness World Record Book, it's Shoaib's delivery, which was delivered at 100.24 mph. According to some of the Australian folks on this forum, it was Lee's delivery, which was delivered at 161.8 kph (faster than Shoaib's), and according to a video I watched, it was Sami's delivery which was delivered at 164 kph (faster than both Shoaib's and Lee's).
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
Goughy101 View Drop Down
12th Man
12th Man


Joined: 02 January 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Post Options Post Options   Quote Goughy101 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 January 2006 at 1:11am

Lets clear things up.

The Sami delivery is irrelevant, as is the 161.8 kph ball by Lee (both due to tech problems.)

"A delivery by Brett Lee from Australia was timed at 161.8kph against the West Indies at Brisbane on November 23, 2000. However this has been put down to an erroneous recording due to external interference of the radar's signal. Two back-up radars recorded the correct speed of 142kph for the delivery." Cricinfo

The fastest ball ever is by Shoaib at 161.3 (100.2 mph) and the second fastest is by Brett Lee at 160.7 (99.8 mph- v. close)

Its all rubbish really as different machines give different readings, there is variable accuracy and most importantly the speed is just for the fastest a ball has travelled through the air. Certain bowlers loose less speed on bouncing/pitching the ball and can therefore make the ball reach the batsman quicker than a bowler with a higher speed reading.

 

 

 

Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Post Options Post Options   Quote saadadvanced7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 January 2006 at 1:57am
Ha, so I was right the first time. I said Shoaib delivered the fastest ball.
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
Charlie View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg


Joined: 29 October 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 202
Post Options Post Options   Quote Charlie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 January 2006 at 10:36am
i reckon brett lee did bowl the bowl that fast....


Edited by Charlie
Back to Top
ANIL KUMBLE View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
7000 test wickets

Joined: 16 December 2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8043
Post Options Post Options   Quote ANIL KUMBLE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 January 2006 at 10:10pm
he did not
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Post Options Post Options   Quote saadadvanced7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 January 2006 at 11:09pm
I agree, He didn't bowl that ball. It has already been explained earlier why Lee didn't deliver that ball.
Back to Top
prayas View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg


Joined: 15 January 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 312
Post Options Post Options   Quote prayas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 January 2006 at 2:59am

do u know why??????????

eat cricket,sleep cricket, dream cricket,play cricket,.,,,,,,,,,,,
Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Post Options Post Options   Quote saadadvanced7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 January 2006 at 8:13am
This is why:

"A delivery by Brett Lee from Australia was timed at 161.8kph against the West Indies at Brisbane on November 23, 2000. However this has been put down to an erroneous recording due to external interference of the radar's signal. Two back-up radars recorded the correct speed of 142kph for the delivery." Cricinfo
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
Black_cap_95 View Drop Down
3rd Man
3rd Man


Joined: 15 December 2005
Location: New Zealand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 228
Post Options Post Options   Quote Black_cap_95 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 February 2006 at 5:51am
bret lee was bowling quick in n.z a year ago he bowledv one at 160.8 i think
go hard or go home
Back to Top
shan View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 30 December 2005
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1324
Post Options Post Options   Quote shan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 February 2006 at 7:02am

Well people are doing well to clear the things up. But forget about fractions, because they do not really matter. All speed guns are different, and there is always a chance of a fractional deviation.

One thing that really matters is that both Shoaib & Lee can bowl almost 160 Km/h, which is really a termendous pace, and they really add passion to this game of cricket.

"Excellence is something we can reach for; perfection is God's business."
Back to Top
MiNiWaRnEy View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
Ricky Ponting for PM

Joined: 14 December 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2395
Post Options Post Options   Quote MiNiWaRnEy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 February 2006 at 5:29am
Dead rioght I agree, they are both great for the game and can get it over 160 kph.
Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Post Options Post Options   Quote saadadvanced7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 February 2006 at 12:09am
Yup!

And I hope there will be no more arguements over who is faster.
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
Howzat16 View Drop Down
12th Man
12th Man
Avatar

Joined: 02 June 2007
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Post Options Post Options   Quote Howzat16 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 June 2007 at 9:44pm
To me speed doesn't really matter to be honest. I mean take a look at Glenn McGrath who was quite quick in his younger days well as he got older he lost some of his pace but he was still taking wickets whether he was bowling 80 mph or lower or maybe, he was still taking wickets. It doesn't matter how fast you are if you're getting tanked all round the ground and not taking wickets does it?
Back to Top
samhache View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 05 March 2007
Location: New Zealand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2139
Post Options Post Options   Quote samhache Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 June 2007 at 11:27pm
Originally posted by Howzat16

To me speed doesn't really matter to be honest. I mean take a look at Glenn McGrath who was quite quick in his younger days well as he got older he lost some of his pace but he was still taking wickets whether he was bowling 80 mph or lower or maybe, he was still taking wickets. It doesn't matter how fast you are if you're getting tanked all round the ground and not taking wickets does it?
 
You are exactly right!!! Ive said it before, and you have just reinforced my point. These guys rambling on about the fastest ball are just wasting their time!! Arggghhhhh
Warriors!!
Back to Top
Bettis91 View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg
Avatar

Joined: 26 May 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 63
Post Options Post Options   Quote Bettis91 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 June 2007 at 8:52pm
Originally posted by snell77

hmmmmmmm heres a table
stest bowlers
99.8 mph, Jeff Thomson (Aus), special study*, 1976
97.8 mph, Andy Roberts (WI), special study*, 1976
98.4 mph, Brett Lee (Aus), v SA, Cape Town, 2001/02
98.2 mph, Shoaib Akhtar (Pak), v Aus, Cardiff, 2001
96.0 mph, Nantie Hayward (SA, v Ind, Bloemfontein, 2001/02
95.1 mph, Waqar Younis (Pak), v SA, 1993
* Thomson and Roberts were measured in controlled conditions with high-speed cameras
Source: CricInfo

I fort that Akhtar got the fastest bowl and dead on 100mph
Let's Get Down To Business
Back to Top
gilchurch View Drop Down
Short Leg
Short Leg
Avatar

Joined: 19 June 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Post Options Post Options   Quote gilchurch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2007 at 12:18am
i think brett lee hit 160 km against south africe in 2006 in south africa.
tonk it for 6
Back to Top
spin wizard View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
The world’s next great spinner

Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9453
Post Options Post Options   Quote spin wizard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 June 2007 at 9:42pm
Interesting stats that Bettis91. Now, this tape here says otherwise about Thompson and Roberts.....      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPDW7hj1yfs
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.832 seconds.