Cameron White

Warne is arguably the greatest player ever to live.

RHB - Warne hardly owns the English....Look at his performance so far in the series. Good but hardly suggesting that he has infinite dominance over the team :S

  This thread is getting out of hand and the insults are something that must stop.

     It might be useful for you all to re-read the rules of this site and see that the kind of behaviour that's been posted here isn't allowed , still less welcome.

    Healthy debate needn't stoop to open warfare - a little sarcasm when in disagreement can be funny , open hostility is not.

Originally posted by 70_degree_spin Originally posted by MiNiWaRnEy Originally posted by 70_degree_spin Fact remains he is not as good as Symonds and they are very similar players so why would he get in ahead of him? If a guy only averages 40 (Adam Voges) then he shouldnt be playing for Australia, thats common sense you fool.     **** off. Look how many of your Pommy players average less than Voges in 1st class cricket. And I still rate m any of them.   All you do is look at fricken stats, Hussey averages 80 in tests, does that make him the 2nd greatest ever batsmen.............NO!   You are so ignorant it make me laugh, and your lack of cricket knowledge and maturity leaves something to be desired.   I am no longer going too bite, as 99% of those who have real cricket knowledge know that you are wrong. I know far more than you 2 put together. I cant prove it but its true. Lack of maturity? Everywhere on this forum you take the **** out of people for making mistakes like going off subject, youre pathetic, you think you own the place, but actually youre some cocky aussie hillbilly who thinks he knows everything about cricket. Egland is not as good as Australia at cricket, the whole bloody universe knows that and sometimes we have to pick 40 average people coz thats all weve got but I dont see why youre picking Voges over Hodge or someone as they are similar ages except Hodge has already proven himself at all levels, unlike your idol Voges. You will never play for Australia and Muralitharan is by far the greatest spin bowler evr, Warne is an amateur compared to him and its funny how you think Muralis a cheat just coz he hasnt got a normal action. Youre such an old fashioned cricket fan and I hate that.

Originally posted by MiNiWaRnEy Originally posted by 70_degree_spin Fact remains he is not as good as Symonds and they are very similar players so why would he get in ahead of him? If a guy only averages 40 (Adam Voges) then he shouldnt be playing for Australia, thats common sense you fool.     **** off. Look how many of your Pommy players average less than Voges in 1st class cricket. And I still rate m any of them.   All you do is look at fricken stats, Hussey averages 80 in tests, does that make him the 2nd greatest ever batsmen.............NO!   You are so ignorant it make me laugh, and your lack of cricket knowledge and maturity leaves something to be desired.   I am no longer going too bite, as 99% of those who have real cricket knowledge know that you are wrong.

I know far more than you 2 put together. I cant prove it but its true. Lack of maturity? Everywhere on this forum you take the **** out of people for making mistakes like going off subject, youre pathetic, you think you own the place, but actually youre some cocky aussie hillbilly who thinks he knows everything about cricket. Egland is not as good as Australia at cricket, the whole bloody universe knows that and sometimes we have to pick 40 average people coz thats all weve got but I dont see why youre picking Voges over Hodge or someone as they are similar ages except Hodge has already proven himself at all levels, unlike your idol Voges. You will never play for Australia and Muralitharan is by far the greatest spin bowler evr, Warne is an amateur compared to him and its funny how you think Muralis a cheat just coz he hasnt got a normal action. Youre such an old fashioned cricket fan and I hate that.

He just scored 126* off 100 balls to smash NSW (him skippering VIC) from no. 4 after NSW set 295 for Vic to win.

You must be the most ignorant bloke on this forum. All you do is look at stats ("Aww Adam Voges only aveages 40....). Get over yourself, I have seen White play and he looks good, very good.

Originally posted by 70_degree_spin Originally posted by RightHandBat Originally posted by Clobber Originally posted by RightHandBat Originally posted by 70_degree_spin His batting would be a joke at test level, he isn't anywhere near good enough! I can see him replacing Michael Clayke or Andrew Symonds if either of them lose form but only then and only in ODI as a guy who can slog in the last few overs and perhaps get a cheap wicket. Nowhere near good enough for test though. How would you know if he isn't given a chance? So do you believe every single player in the game should be given a Test to see if they are good enough at that level? No, but White has first class double centuries, and this guy's saying he'd be nowhere near up to test standard. If he can bat for that long to score a double century, I think he has potential to become a Test Player. Yeah youre right, Jason Gillespie should be in the Aussie side as a batsman.

I'm talking about a batsman with proper batting skill, you dimwit.

Originally posted by Clobber Originally posted by RightHandBat Originally posted by 70_degree_spin His batting would be a joke at test level, he isn't anywhere near good enough! I can see him replacing Michael Clayke or Andrew Symonds if either of them lose form but only then and only in ODI as a guy who can slog in the last few overs and perhaps get a cheap wicket. Nowhere near good enough for test though. How would you know if he isn't given a chance? So do you believe every single player in the game should be given a Test to see if they are good enough at that level?

No, but White has first class double centuries, and this guy's saying he'd be nowhere near up to test standard. If he can bat for that long to score a double century, I think he has potential to become a Test Player.

That is a load of crap. The bloke has first class double tons, and other centuries. You need temperament and control to be able to do that. Unless you have seen him play it is hard to judge him.. He can score fast, but he doesn't really take the aerial route, and if he does it is usually over the field, not through it.

His batting would be a joke at test level, he isn't anywhere near good enough! I can see him replacing Michael Clayke or Andrew Symonds if either of them lose form but only then and only in ODI as a guy who can slog in the last few overs and perhaps get a cheap wicket. Nowhere near good enough for test though.

Yeah who is this Cameron white?

His matrity for such a young man is the most impressive factor about him. He was a slogger who bowled spin and transformed himself into a class bat.

Originally posted by MiNiWaRnEy he is like Brearley but can actually play cricket.

Ooooooooooooh!!! Very cutting Mik !!