Forum Home Forum Home » Let's Talk Cricket » General Cricket Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: (D/L) Rule
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

(D/L) Rule

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
crownmethod View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2938
Post Options Post Options   Quote crownmethod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: (D/L) Rule
    Posted: 27 February 2006 at 7:30am
Ive been looking on a scorecard of a cricket game. It says that a team won my the (D/L) rule. What does D/L mean? and how exaclty did they win?
Back to Top
Sledger View Drop Down
Captain
Captain
Avatar
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law !

Joined: 08 August 2005
Location: South Africa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15694
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sledger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 7:53am
Duckworth-Lewis is the current method used to resolve one day internationals that are rain-affected.

When the weather reduces the number of overs in a match , the target of the side batting 2nd is adjusted.

It's not a perfect solution , but is undoubtably the fairest method for rain-affected matches.
Mental disintegration works for me !!
Back to Top
crownmethod View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2938
Post Options Post Options   Quote crownmethod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 7:59am
So what would happen if the team batting second, needs 60 off 20 balls, and it starts raining heavely and bad light happens. Does the team batting first win or does the team batting second wins?
Back to Top
Sledger View Drop Down
Captain
Captain
Avatar
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law !

Joined: 08 August 2005
Location: South Africa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15694
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sledger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 February 2006 at 8:06am
If rain threatens during the 2nd innings , both sides are kept up todate with who is winning at that precise moment. Duckworth-Lewis determines the outcome for any game that has seen both sides go past 25 overs - the score necessary to win after the 1st innings has finished is provided over by over beyond the 25th.

The calculations are complex , but the total number of runs needed to win is based on runrate , the number of wickets to have fallen (in both knocks) and the number of overs still to be bowled in the 2nd dig.

Mental disintegration works for me !!
Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Post Options Post Options   Quote saadadvanced7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 3:42am
WOW!

You know a lot of stuff!
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
ANIL KUMBLE View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
7000 test wickets

Joined: 16 December 2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8043
Post Options Post Options   Quote ANIL KUMBLE Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 3:46am
i think it should be postponed for the next day instead of that duck thing
Back to Top
saadadvanced7 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar
4000 Test Runs

Joined: 04 August 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3938
Post Options Post Options   Quote saadadvanced7 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 3:48am
You weren't asked to give your opinion on how you feel about the Duckworth Lewis Law!
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
Back to Top
crownmethod View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2938
Post Options Post Options   Quote crownmethod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 9:32am
I agree with you kumble.The Duckworth Lewis rule doesnt work properley. It definelty should be postponed for the next day.
Back to Top
Sledger View Drop Down
Captain
Captain
Avatar
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law !

Joined: 08 August 2005
Location: South Africa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15694
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sledger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 9:46am
Originally posted by crownmethod

I agree with you kumble.The Duckworth Lewis rule doesnt work properley. It definelty should be postponed for the next day.


It doesn't work properly????? How can ANY progression work perfectly , that's impossible. Duckworth/Lewis is by far THE best system to produce a fair result from rain affected cricket matches. The powers that be and the players mostly agree that it's been brilliantly researched by two very bright lads.

As for postponing the match until the following day , that's ludicrous for a number of reasons.

1) There might be another game scheduled for the next day.
2) The players might have to fly to another location for their next fixture.
3) They might be flying home after the end of the tour

4) It might STILL be raining the next day!

5) The players don't want to reply matches , especially insignificant one day affairs , they play enough!

Since D/L has been used the griping has fallen away. It's not perfect , but it's the best suggestion by a country mile.
Mental disintegration works for me !!
Back to Top
Sledger View Drop Down
Captain
Captain
Avatar
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law !

Joined: 08 August 2005
Location: South Africa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15694
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sledger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 9:49am
Originally posted by crownmethod

I agree with you kumble.The Duckworth Lewis rule doesnt work properley.....


Amazing!! You open a thread because you're ignorant about the D/L Method and now you say it doesn't work!!

Kindly explain why , I'm all ears....

Edited by Sledger
Mental disintegration works for me !!
Back to Top
crownmethod View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2938
Post Options Post Options   Quote crownmethod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 9:52am

South Africa needed something like 24 of 56 during the 1st ODI i think. They won by the duck rule. They did have about 6 wicket in hand, but if it wasn't raining, Australia would still have a chance. This is why the rule doesnt work.

(I dont think this makes any sense......)



Edited by crownmethod
Back to Top
crownmethod View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2938
Post Options Post Options   Quote crownmethod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 9:54am

May I ask, if South Africa needed 24 of 56, with one wicket in hand, and it started to rain. Do they still win?

Back to Top
Sledger View Drop Down
Captain
Captain
Avatar
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law !

Joined: 08 August 2005
Location: South Africa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15694
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sledger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 9:56am
Originally posted by crownmethod

South Africa needed something like 24 of 56 during the 1st ODI i think. They won by the duck rule. They did have about 6 wicket in hand, but if it wasn't raining, Australia would still have a chance. This is why the rule doesnt work.


Get a grip lad - a top side has to score 24 off 56 balls with 6 wickets in hand and you think they could lose????

Australia had two chances , a dog's chance and no chance.
Mental disintegration works for me !!
Back to Top
Sledger View Drop Down
Captain
Captain
Avatar
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law !

Joined: 08 August 2005
Location: South Africa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15694
Post Options Post Options   Quote Sledger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 9:58am
Originally posted by crownmethod

May I ask, if South Africa needed 24 of 56, with one wicket in hand, and it started to rain. Do they still win?



this is altogether different and I don't have the tables of Duckworth Lewis - but it would be a lot closer. The number of wickets Australia lost plays a significant role as well.
Mental disintegration works for me !!
Back to Top
crownmethod View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2938
Post Options Post Options   Quote crownmethod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 10:05am
This Duckworth Lewis rule is too complicated for me to understand
Back to Top
crownmethod View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 25 January 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2938
Post Options Post Options   Quote crownmethod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 February 2006 at 10:07am

Originally posted by Sledger

Originally posted by crownmethod

South Africa needed something like 24 of 56 during the 1st ODI i think. They won by the duck rule. They did have about 6 wicket in hand, but if it wasn't raining, Australia would still have a chance. This is why the rule doesnt work.


Get a grip lad - a top side has to score 24 off 56 balls with 6 wickets in hand and you think they could lose????

Australia had two chances , a dog's chance and no chance.

Someone could always get a hat-trick, like Brett Lee.

Or the South African Batting Line up could just collapse. I seen that many times.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.791 seconds.