Kamran Akmal |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1234> |
| Author |
 Share Topic Printable Version Delicious Digg Facebook Furl Google Boomarks Google Buzz MySpace Newsvine reddit StumbleUpon Translate Twitter Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks Topic Search  Topic Options
|
TANZ 
Short Leg 
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
 Post Options
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Kamran AkmalPosted: 13 January 2006 at 1:19pm |
|
i dont think he should open as malik is doing good at the moment and butt is a quality opener. kamran is good aswell and has a good strike rate but i think he should come later on
|
|
 |
|
|
saadadvanced7
Banned 
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 1:31pm |
|
Kamran Akmal should continue opening in ODIs because he did well against England so they've got to give him a chance against India.
In tests, Malik should remain...for now. |
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 1:38pm |
|
what do you mean by malik sould remain for now do you insist that malik and kamran open? i think malik and butt will do good its just a bad start for butt just a bit of bad luck
|
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 2:20pm |
|
butt and akmal should open in odi's and for tests butt and either yaseer hameed or imran farhat and maybe shoaib malik but i think malik should be batting down the order good all rounder at the moment i reckon hameed and butt open and im hoping mohammad hafeez gets back into the test squad because he averages over 40
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 January 2006 at 2:22pm |
|
akmal scored back to back tons against england so he should remain as the opener for pakistan with butt in odis
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 January 2006 at 3:53am |
|
Butt and Akmal is ODIs. They play fairly fast and Akmal has proved himself worthy. Butt is already worthy.
Malik and Butt in Tests. The key opener is Butt. |
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 January 2006 at 6:24pm |
|
kamran did very well playing so late today and i dont think if he opens butt or malik could do that so i think he should remain lower in testes
|
|
|
|
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 January 2006 at 12:08am |
|
Yea, I agree. Akmal and Afridi batting lower down the order in Tests can do a whole lot of damage. They should that on the second day of the first test between India and Pakistan. Both hitting centuries off around 80 balls.
|
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 10:35am |
|
exactly right so the line up should slay the way it is correct?
|
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 10:45am |
|
yaseer hameed is a proper opener malik is a low order batsmen allrounder |
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 10:47am |
|
but if he playes they will have to drop someone who could that be? |
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 1:19pm |
|
maybe malik or sami even rana imran farhat has been in good form he might even get a recall theres mohammad hafeez but he hasnt done well lately i think there line ups for odis should be 1.s.butt 2.k.akmal 3.y.khan 4.m.yousuf 5.i.ul-haq 6.a.razzaq 7.s.afridi 8.rana naved ul-hasan 9.s.akhtar 10.u.gul 11.a.khan sub:s.malik or sami kaneria dosent do well in odis for tests 1.s.butt 2.y.hameed 3.y.khan 4.m.yousuf 5.i.ul-haq 6.s.afridi 7.k.akmal 8.s.malik 9.nave ul-hasan 10.akhtar 11.kaneria 12th man a.razzaq |
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 1:27pm |
|
i have been hearing that sami will get droped for the next test any truth in that?
|
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 1:42pm |
|
havent heard anything about that but he has been struggling a bit so it maybe true but i think not
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 January 2006 at 1:52pm |
|
you really think gul will play in the odi i doubt that
|
|
|
|
|
cricketluva
Square Leg
Joined: 09 April 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 432 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 January 2006 at 1:29am |
You are missing a fast bowler from the test side, too many batsmen and 3 spinnners?? You brought in Yasser Hameed to replace Malik in the openers roll but you still kept malik in and dropped your medium-Fast bowling all rounder Abdul Razzaq?? Why? Afridi is okay in the 2nd spinners role after Kaneria, then you open the bowling with Akhtar and Rana, Razzaq 1st change and Kaneria and Afridi after that.
|
|
|
See you later Gilly! Thanks for the memories! |
|
|
|
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 January 2006 at 5:24am |
|
No offense, ANIL KUMBLE, but that team is sort of messed up.
|
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 January 2006 at 5:45pm |
|
i only put razzaq out because he's injury if he wasnt injured i'd have malik out razzaq in malik's 59 against india wasnt all that convincing to me sami out of form umar gul has good averages in both forms of the game
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 January 2006 at 10:12pm |
|
i think razzak will be fit for the odis
|
|
|
|
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 January 2006 at 10:41pm |
|
Hopefully he will be because his bowling and batting are both very useful.
|
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2006 at 10:07am |
|
yes he could help pakistan out a lot being able to batt and bowl well
|
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2006 at 10:26am |
|
i think hes bowling is more useful then his batting so you can take out one of the seamers and put in 2 spinners |
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2006 at 10:53am |
|
who would you take out ? |
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2006 at 12:41pm |
|
probably malik but he has been in good knick lately |
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2006 at 7:19pm |
|
Razzaq is a useful batsman lower down the order but his bowling is not as good as it used to be.
|
|
|
|
|
TANZ
Short Leg
Joined: 08 December 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 352 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2006 at 7:02pm |
|
true but he doesn't allways bat that well as well
|
|
|
|
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2006 at 8:58pm |
|
Yea, but that's because he comes lower down the order and doesn't have enough time to get set at the crease. He has to come in and has to right away start smacking the other team all over the ground, and in doing that he risks his wicket.
|
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2006 at 9:08pm |
|
like the time he smashed a sinzzalting 50 from 22 balls
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2006 at 9:12pm |
|
Yea, against England. That took Pakistan to I think 350+ and pretty much guranteed them victory.
|
|
|
|
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 January 2006 at 9:13pm |
|
yep that showed them english
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
