Lara vs Sachin

When both of these players are in form, I would pay to see Lara. He is the master at making big scores and scores at a healthy rate. Thats what I like to see at a cricket match!

maybe u didn't watch cricket abt a decade ago. in india if sachin was out the whole team was gone. we didn't have good players except a few. i agree that lara had to spent more time with a bad team than sachin but sachin also had good players alongside him at the start of 2003. so both players had similar atmosphere to play and both have similar records so its difficult to pick the better player

well u can't expect sachin to stay till the end after he has hit a century. he was an opener and after the 100 i don't think he can play much. its upto the middle order to finis off the game and that they weren't able to do. so its not sachin's fault. in his inns of 144 against aussies in sharjah also the middle order didn't perform and india lost so its not his fault.

on the other hand lara comes at 3 or 4 position so he can be there till the end as he won't get that tired. u might feel that i m biased but your pt. is not a very good pt. as an arguement. one player alone cannot do everything. he needs support from other team members

well sachin has hit 39 odi centuries and no one can come near it.

i don't want to compare both these great players but some of them r giving arguemets which aren't holding any solid reasons. so i m givin the facts. both r best in their own business