Most difficult bowling to face

Wow, difficult top choose. I am torn between Harmison and Murali. Harmison has got 6/19 and 7/12 in uneven bounce cinditions and Murali has got countless 7 fors and 8 fors on spin wickets. I'm going to have to go for Murali. Please vote and comment. Thanks

Warne in spinning conditions, like Murali, is virtually unplayable!

You really think I'd last long enough to know the difference?

  Aye, whatever you say mate!

Well, thats fair enough; after all, we all think different and have different opinions. I am just making a point that none is better than the other by a long way; that's all!

All the above, I wouldn't want to face at all!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Well, except for hoggard.

all of them, as they would all be difficult to play in conditions they are suited to and when they are on song. Though i would say harmy and akhtar would be scary to face in such conditions and can even injure you!

I'd actually say Malinga on any surface. Its a crazy action but its almost impossible to work out where the ball is and where its going.

warney is the hardest bowler to face in spinning conditions warney is the best bowler in the world murali the best statistical bowler

Hmm i have to say murali but in all honesty i'd be soiling my pants over facing harmison, at least with murali i could have some fun (try dancing down the pitch to him etc)

Originally posted by comedyking warney is the hardest bowler to face in spinning conditions warney is the best bowler in the world murali the best statistical bowler

What? How does that work? Murali takes more wickets but Warne is more dangerous, whatever you say.

Originally posted by 70DS Originally posted by comedyking warney is the hardest bowler to face in spinning conditions warney is the best bowler in the world murali the best statistical bowler What? How does that work? Murali takes more wickets but Warne is more dangerous, whatever you say.

Edited by spin wizard - 02 January 2007 at 6:27pm

Originally posted by 70_degree_spin Originally posted by 143no It's warney for me, Murali will always have the stench of a cheat around him. His action is perfectly legal, I think its disgraceful how people like you still think this after dozens of tests on his action, there is nothing cheat about using your assets. A model uses her good looks, a comedian uses his gift of the gab, murali suses his deficiency. Do not call him a cheat!!!

I've gone for Warne on spinning conditions, he's usually really difficult to play on a normal wicket but he's totally lethal on a spinning wicket, extremely difficult to score runs off.

Originally posted by 143no Originally posted by 70_degree_spin Originally posted by 143no It's warney for me, Murali will always have the stench of a cheat around him. His action is perfectly legal, I think its disgraceful how people like you still think this after dozens of tests on his action, there is nothing cheat about using your assets. A model uses her good looks, a comedian uses his gift of the gab, murali suses his deficiency. Do not call him a cheat!!!     Considering you have the cricket knowledge of a tennis shoe, I think I will stick with my own opinions. Wether he chucks or not, he is always going to have it hanging over his head, same as Warney will be remembered as much for his off field antics as on.

ehhhh mate, youre a pathetic little loser with your stolen insults and i havnt got in to a fight since that one with MIK. Have you noticed that since he got banned there hasnt been a single fight? Coincidence I think not. Plus why did you have to insult me there? I wasnt taking a stab at you, i just think its bad that Murali is treated badly. Now stop trying to get this thread banned. Start posting in the "batting discussion" thread. You could give us some sound advice on how to get out in 8 different ways. loser

I would love to have seen a mention of Ntini  in pacy situation, becos offlate he has been one of the best bowlers under suitable conditions, specially his very well directed bouncers can knock any batsmen out, very very fine bowler.