| Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Guests
Starter
|
Topic: New Zealand v Australia Posted: 01 March 2005 at 2:01am |
|
Even with a very much second string side Australia managed to restrict New Zealand to 233. New Zealand started off fairly well but then practically collapsed. James Hopes (debutant for Australia) managed to pick up a couple of wickets of Australia and Glenn McGrath took a couple too to equal Shane Warne's all time record for wickets for Australia against New Zealand in One Day International cricket. Australia are cruising in reply chasing 234 and it looks as if its 4&0 to the Aussies.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 01 March 2005 at 11:13am |
|
Another crushing victory for Australia even without Ponting and Hayden they chased down the total with complete ease. Adam Gilchrist was man of the Match with his 54 of 37 deliveries and Damien Martyn also chipped in with an unbeaten half century. New Zealand really now should try and focus on the upcomming Test series between the two nations as they truly look hopeless with in the limited overs version of the game which is actually meant to be their strength.
Edited by JALRC
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 01 March 2005 at 11:18am |
|
Speaking of the Test Series Darren Lehmann has been ruled out and will now undergo surgery for his troubled shoulder but he hasnot said that this will be the end of his career in fact on the contrary - he wants to be fully fit for the upcomming Ashes series and this will help safe guard his fitness ahead of the tour of England in the summer. Three Tests at the moment would probably be too much with the pain that his shoulder is giving him and surgery will help rid him of that pain. So more injury troubles for Australia who are already missing Hayden through shoulder trouble and Shane Watson could be out for the rest of the year and even with all these problems they seem to be destroying any opposition in sight! Incredible!
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 02 March 2005 at 12:05am |
|
It now does look as though Brad Hodge will finally get his call up to the Test squad. He may not play though dependant on how the fitness and form of other players goes and he is at the moment set to miss out in favor of Simon Katich. Australia have somewhat unusually been giving a lot of players chances to make it into the national team which they're not really reknown for but have lately given debut's to about 12 players combined in both forms of the game. That i suppose is due to the likes of McGrath, Warne, Lehmann and Kasprowicz all being over the age of 35 but Australia really are changing this side around a lot.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 02 March 2005 at 2:34pm |
|
More changes are set to be rung in for the final One Dayer of the series, with practically all the semior New Zealand players being rested. I think Flemming and Cairns mayne the only 2 to actually play. Australia will stillbe without Hayden though Ponting is set to return though Lee may be rested with the possibility of him being called up into the Test team.
|
 |
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6232
|
Posted: 02 March 2005 at 2:57pm |
There's the difference, or at least one marked difference amongst many, between the two sides: Australia suffer a few injuries, and you wouldn't know the difference as they have so much strength in depth they hardly suffer at all. New Zealand, however suffer a few injuries and instead of just getting beat they get absolutely hammered.
It doesn't bode well for the Test series...
Edited by -JP-
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 02 March 2005 at 5:56pm |
|
Yeah i think the Test Series will be very One sided, as have the last few Test series that Australia have played in. Since Ricky Ponting has taken the reigns Australia have only lost 1 Test Match and that is the space of over a year, and they have won every single series which is now 5 in a row. Australia do seem to deal better with injuries than mist sides, you just look at the way that England fell apart without Flintoff and the way India usually do without Sachin or Harbajan. I think England are still abysmall in the One Day game even with Fintoff though. Though that is what makes champions, everyday can have that run of fantastic results and that sort of period of greatness but its performing when the chips are down and grinding out those tough results and getting those results when you play badly which Australia seem to do more than most and on a more consistant basis. I believe that the thing that accounts for that more than anything is the fact that player for player Australia seem to be better than the rest of the world. More often than not their statistics alone back that up but i just think the players that Australia have in reserve would make it into any other nation's first team. Other than Australia could you ever see anyone dropping both the Waugh brothers concurrently? Or could you see them dropping Shane Warne or somebody like Darren Lehmann or Michael Bevan? Yet Australia have given all of those players the boot at one point or another and some of them more than once, Steven Waugh was dropped 3 times from the Test side incredibly and twice from the One Day side. Darren Lehmann only became a regular member of the team a couple of years back and he didn't last long. Look how long it took Michael Kasprowicz to get back into the team. Martin Love scored a hundred in his final Test and got dropped and still hasn't made it back into the team even though he now has a First class (domestic) Triple Hundred to his name. Everybody says that as sportman you have take whatever opportunities come your way and make the most of them and that is never more so true than with the case with cricketers who play for Australia. Could you see Martin Love or Brett Lee or even Simon Katich struggling to make it into any other team in the world. Would any other team drop a player who averages over 53 and at one point averaged 60 in the limited version of the game? Would any other country actually do the right thing and ban one of their players for drug abuse before the start of the biggest tournament the game hosts? And at that their best spinner in history, and without a doubt the best spinner of all time. The reason that the Australians seem to perform so much better when they throw out a second string team is because they know that they (the reservist players out there) may never get another opportunity and that they have to make the most of it. That more than anything gives the inspiration and motivation and that's why i think player for player they are just better than any other nation's team or squad anywhere in the world. I don't know if any other's agree with me on this or not but i am one of the people (and the only one (that i know off anyway) at the MCC) who thinks that this year's Ashes series will be just another walk in the park for Australia. Even without half their star players (Lehmann is going to have surgery on his shoulder and we don't know what state Matthew Hayden's shoulder is in and Shane Watson is out for the rest of the year) they could wipe the floor with England. Just say that Flintoff isn't fit and doesn't take part in the series? Surely that would then be it for England no? At the moment i can't see anything but the usual torrential British Weather stopping Australia from winning all 5 Tests. They've beaten every side with both homefield advantage and on the road with their recent win in India within the 5 year period of ICC laws stating that every side must play each other within so now what would be their objective? To whitewash every nation home and away? They've already done that to Bangladesh and would have done the same to Zimbabwe had Zimbabwe not been barred from Test Cricket for the bulk of last year. They beat Pakistan 3&0 before the World cup in 2003 (well it was more toward the end of 2002) and just beat them with the same scoreline a couple of months back. They beat New Zealand 2&0 recently and now have the opportunity to whitewash them on the road. They beat Sri Lanka 3&0 last year in Sri Lanka and came close to whitewashing them in the series in Australia but only won that 2 Test series 1&0 due to Ricky Ponting's failure to declare soon enough on the final day. I think now this Australian team can be talked of in the same sentance of the West Indian side that was led by Clive and of England led out in the late 1800's by W.D. Grace as truly unplayable sides, and i think that this one goes down as the single greatest of the lot of them, and the greatest of all time now.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 03 March 2005 at 5:05am |
Originally posted by JALRC
Yeah i think the Test Series will be very One sided, as have the last few Test series that Australia have played in. Since Ricky Ponting has taken the reigns Australia have only lost 1 Test Match and that is the space of over a year, and they have won every single series which is now 5 in a row. Australia do seem to deal better with injuries than mist sides, you just look at the way that England fell apart without Flintoff and the way India usually do without Sachin or Harbajan. I think England are still abysmall in the One Day game even with Fintoff though. Though that is what makes champions, everyday can have that run of fantastic results and that sort of period of greatness but its performing when the chips are down and grinding out those tough results and getting those results when you play badly which Australia seem to do more than most and on a more consistant basis. I believe that the thing that accounts for that more than anything is the fact that player for player Australia seem to be better than the rest of the world. More often than not their statistics alone back that up but i just think the players that Australia have in reserve would make it into any other nation's first team. Other than Australia could you ever see anyone dropping both the Waugh brothers concurrently? Or could you see them dropping Shane Warne or somebody like Darren Lehmann or Michael Bevan? Yet Australia have given all of those players the boot at one point or another and some of them more than once, Steven Waugh was dropped 3 times from the Test side incredibly and twice from the One Day side. Darren Lehmann only became a regular member of the team a couple of years back and he didn't last long. Look how long it took Michael Kasprowicz to get back into the team. Martin Love scored a hundred in his final Test and got dropped and still hasn't made it back into the team even though he now has a First class (domestic) Triple Hundred to his name. Everybody says that as sportman you have take whatever opportunities come your way and make the most of them and that is never more so true than with the case with cricketers who play for Australia. Could you see Martin Love or Brett Lee or even Simon Katich struggling to make it into any other team in the world. Would any other team drop a player who averages over 53 and at one point averaged 60 in the limited version of the game? Would any other country actually do the right thing and ban one of their players for drug abuse before the start of the biggest tournament the game hosts? And at that their best spinner in history, and without a doubt the best spinner of all time. The reason that the Australians seem to perform so much better when they throw out a second string team is because they know that they (the reservist players out there) may never get another opportunity and that they have to make the most of it. That more than anything gives the inspiration and motivation and that's why i think player for player they are just better than any other nation's team or squad anywhere in the world. I don't know if any other's agree with me on this or not but i am one of the people (and the only one (that i know off anyway) at the MCC) who thinks that this year's Ashes series will be just another walk in the park for Australia. Even without half their star players (Lehmann is going to have surgery on his shoulder and we don't know what state Matthew Hayden's shoulder is in and Shane Watson is out for the rest of the year) they could wipe the floor with England. Just say that Flintoff isn't fit and doesn't take part in the series? Surely that would then be it for England no? At the moment i can't see anything but the usual torrential British Weather stopping Australia from winning all 5 Tests. They've beaten every side with both homefield advantage and on the road with their recent win in India within the 5 year period of ICC laws stating that every side must play each other within so now what would be their objective? To whitewash every nation home and away? They've already done that to Bangladesh and would have done the same to Zimbabwe had Zimbabwe not been barred from Test Cricket for the bulk of last year. They beat Pakistan 3&0 before the World cup in 2003 (well it was more toward the end of 2002) and just beat them with the same scoreline a couple of months back. They beat New Zealand 2&0 recently and now have the opportunity to whitewash them on the road. They beat Sri Lanka 3&0 last year in Sri Lanka and came close to whitewashing them in the series in Australia but only won that 2 Test series 1&0 due to Ricky Ponting's failure to declare soon enough on the final day. I think now this Australian team can be talked of in the same sentance of the West Indian side that was led by Clive and of England led out in the late 1800's by W.D. Grace as truly unplayable sides, and i think that this one goes down as the single greatest of the lot of them, and the greatest of all time now. |
Long winded JAL , but not far from the mark. I don't think England are quite ready for the Aussies , but it won't be 5-0 !!! I did laugh when you mentioned Shane Watson - he is average at best!!!!! The England side under WG lost their 1st test too - to the Aussies , they were far from unbeatable. The greatest side before this current Aussie lot was the 1948 Aussie side to England - they weren't called The Unbeatables for nothing.
I still think the WI of the early/mid 80's would have hospitalised this mob and then Viv , Gordon , Desmond and Co would have battered them into submission. It's all subjective , but I don't believe they are unbeatable and any side that gets rolled over for about 100 can't be all that fantastic!! (guess I'm an Aussie hater!!  )
|
 |
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6232
|
Posted: 05 March 2005 at 9:49am |
Australia completed the 5-0 whitewash today, thumping the Kiwis by 122 runs thanks to an unbeaten 141 from Ponting and then 91 from Gilchrist. Kasprowicz then took 3/36 as New Zealand could only make it to 225/8 from their 50 overs.
Well done JALRC for predicting the 5-0, less so me for thinking it might be 4-1 or even 3-2 !!
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 March 2005 at 1:24am |
No need to quote the entire post Inducker!
Originally posted by Inducker
I did laugh when you mentioned Shane Watson - he is average at best!!!!! |
His domestic statistics read a lot better than his international record does and he has only played a very little while at the highest level.
Originally posted by Inducker
The England side under WG lost their 1st test too - to the Aussies , they were far from unbeatable. |
That may be so but they still hold a 120 year old record (well the record started back then anyway) of winning the most consecutive Test series' in a row, 8. The West Indies side of the 1970's and 80's fell one short as did this current Australian side though to be fair they are currently part of an ongoing record in which they have won their last 5 Test Series and may have a chance to equal their own all time record of 7 series in a row against England this summer.
Originally posted by Inducker
The greatest side before this current Aussie lot was the 1948 Aussie side to England - they weren't called The Unbeatables for nothing. |
They may have been called untouchables but it was only be name. Their record was actually abysmall and though they may have been filled with individual superstars like Bradman and Ponsford they never performed as a team and you really can't even class them as one of the all time greats. Plus the likes of Ponsford never really materielised as far as their raw talent went; he never seemed to perform in the International arena what he did in the domestic arena and his statistics show it. He hit 4 scores of 300 or more in First class cricket, including 2 scores of over 400 which has only just been equalled by Brian Lara but he couldn't even average 45 in Test cricket. That side my friend it has to be said were just not very good.
Originally posted by Inducker
I still think the WI of the early/mid 80's would have hospitalised this mob and then Viv , Gordon , Desmond and Co would have battered them into submission. |
Maybe yeah but i think Lee and Gillespie would have given as good as Holding and Garner and co. As for the batsmen well the records of Viv, Gordon, Desmond, Clive etc etc just don't compare to that of Ponting, Hayden, Gilchrist and co. Maybe this lots' records wouldn't be so good if they did indeed face bowling like the lot of the West Indians in their peak but then again would the bowling of their'd be so good if they faced batsmen of this quality that we have today? See the problem you face when you try to compare those that aren't like? X + Y can never be simplified any further than the form that it takes there. The reason that lot never did have any other players with records similar to their's is because they never let them have those records because they were too strong against them, which is why they were the best. If both sides participated in the same era one or the other would have to give and you would have one outright greatest side. I think thise Australian side would be that greatest side. You obviously disagree and think it would have been the West Indian side of the 1970's through early 1990's. Fair enough, time will tell.
Originally posted by Inducker
don't believe they are unbeatable and any side that gets rolled over for about 100 can't be all that fantastic!! |
When did that ever happen? 
Originally posted by Inducker
It's all subjective |
Not in my case its not.
Originally posted by Inducker
guess I'm an Aussie hater!!  |
Guess it is in your case.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 March 2005 at 1:26am |
Originally posted by -JP-
Well done JALRC for predicting the 5-0, less so me for thinking it might be 4-1 or even 3-2 !! |
Thanks JP and i think your prediction was probably the more favored and likely supported outcome by most analysts and supporters before the series due to the complacency that Australia generally tend to show every now and again but for some reason i knew this time they'd kick into gear.
A whole heap of records being set, i'll post them in the statistics forum.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 March 2005 at 1:34am |
|
As for the series itself well very one sided and it may well have taken its toll on the Kiwi's mentally and i wouldn't be surprised if they were absolutely steamrollered in the Test series. I predict another easy whitewash for the Australians and i think this will be the end of the line for Stephen Flemming as captain. His record as captain is hardly something to shout about and his record as a batsman is pathetic. I think this side now needs a bit of a shake up and some freshening up and Stephen now i think has come to the end of his international career. Mark Richardson recently left the side and Chris Cairns refused to return to Test cricket (i'll make a seperate post as far as that's concerned) and the avergae age of the side is now also getting quite high. Even if its just to give a boost to the other players or just maybe even some fake hope, some news on Shane Bond's condition really could help as New Zealand desperately could do with a premier strike bowler again. As for the Australians well their only problems really lie in who plays and who doesn't? With Hayden missing they may well go with the 6 specialist batsmen and that way Lee can come back into the side with nobody getting the chop. Who knows and to be frank who cares? Whoever they dield out there they're gonna win and the only think it really might affect is the future line-up if someone can really cement their place in the side like Simon Katich or maybe even Mike Hussey or Andrew Symmonds? A few more records falling here which i'll post in the Statistics forum.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 07 March 2005 at 1:35am |
|
By the way sorry for any spelling mistakes as i'm tired and its late and i think i'm jetlagged.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 09 March 2005 at 7:39pm |
|
The test series is now about to start with Mike Hussey looking like making his Test debut in for the injured Matt Hayden. I think Australia would be better off going with the 4 seamers and that way not having to drop anybody for Lee's recall. But it does look likely that Kasprowicz will be dropped which is a real shame i think, Australia have more than enough strength in batting and should give Clarke the chance to open like he did in the One Dayers and push Gilchrist upto 6 leaving all 4 Seamers a chance to play.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 09 March 2005 at 10:03pm |
|
As it turns out Australia go with 3 quicks and Warne but Lee still is left out with Kasprowicz staying in the side, and i think rightly so. If Australia do go with the 7 specialist batsmen then i think Lee should be the one to sit out. Ricky Ponting won the toss and sent the Kiwis in and New Zealand have made a very slow cautious start to the match.
Edited by JALRC
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 10 March 2005 at 1:49am |
|
A slow start maybe but pretty solid actually. NZ are 130 odd for 1 with a good 60 odd overs being bowled. The run rate is poor but NZ are grafting it out. Unfortunately though you feel if they lose one wicket a whole heap are gonna tumble.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 10 March 2005 at 5:18am |
Originally posted by JALRC
As it turns out Australia go with 3 quicks and Warne but Lee still is left out with Kasprowicz staying in the side, and i think rightly so. If Australia do go with the 7 specialist batsmen then i think Lee should be the one to sit out. Ricky Ponting won the toss and sent the Kiwis in and New Zealand have made a very slow cautious start to the match. |
These comments shouldn't be made here - this is a mickey mouse cricket thread , not the proper stuff at all!!
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 10 March 2005 at 9:47am |
Listen in future don't make seperate posts for individual Tests, keep it going in the same thread as the topic that discuss's the whole series.
Continue it here.
I saw in your other post (maybe it can be moved into this topic) you asked what the first day's play was like and i have to say pretty good. It was good to see NZ really grind it out and pull out a real hard fought days play and they did well. Their run rate may have only been around 2.8 but they only lost the 3 wickets. You'd think that there was something in the pitch as Ricky Ponting sent the Kiwis in but there really wasn't too much. It didn't pay off and to be honest i didn't think it would but his records been pretty successful so far so let's give him the benefit of the doubt.
Tough day follows ahead for Australia they really do need quick wickets and it'll be a tough Test from now on in.
|
 |
Beefy
Short Leg
Joined: 28 January 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 53
|
Posted: 10 March 2005 at 7:11pm |
|
Great start by the Kiwis but I expect the Aussies will be out of the blocks quickly tomorrow. If Marshall and Astle go early, I can't see anyone else holding the innings together.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 10 March 2005 at 11:27pm |
|
Yeah that's what i thought may well have happened yesterday but as it is it has started with New Zealand now 5 down. Warne bowling Marshall clean and then McGrath gettingin on the act too. here starts the Kiwi crumble.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 12:48am |
|
New Zealand now 6 down but they have got 400 up on the board and they are certainly putting up some show at the moment. Their run rate has now also progressed to 3 for the first time in the match.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 1:53am |
|
Absolutely incredible from Mcgrath! Six for 115 of an incredible 42 overs! That Kiwi collapse did in the end take place with them being dismissed for 433. Australia start their response now and you feel that things are gonna go very much downhill from now on in for NZ. i feel a complete idiot for saying that maybe he should have been given the boot around the time of the tour of India.
Edited by JALRC
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 5:16am |
|
The end of day 2 and Aussie are 141-3. Losing both openers and then the big wicket of Martin just before the close definitely means advantage New Zealand!
Ponting still there on 41 and Gillespie in as night watchman. S'funny that , Steve Waugh would ahve walked in himself , never believing in the night watchman principal.
A long way to go before NZ can even think of an upset , there's a fella named Gilchrist on the horizon and an upstart called Clarke......
Still , a great effort from the Kiwis and another sterling effort from McGrath.
Should be a fascinating day tomorrow !!
|
 |
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6232
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 9:43am |
|
Good start for the Kiwis, but like you say there's a long way to go and a lot of cricket to play and with this Australian team you can't take anything for granted.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 12:30pm |
Originally posted by Inducker
The end of day 2 and Aussie are 141-3. Losing both openers and then the big wicket of Martin just before the close definitely means advantage New Zealand! |
Yeah i thought Australia would runaway with the match when they came into bat but its been anything but.
Originally posted by Inducker
Ponting still there on 41 and Gillespie in as night watchman. S'funny that , Steve Waugh would ahve walked in himself , never believing in the night watchman principal. |
Yeah it just shows the difference between Waugh and Ponting. Waugh was a leader from the front who believed in fighting to the death where as Ponting where as Ponting tries to worm his way around situations and manipulate the system to his benefit. I know it sounds a bit harsh but it is true.
Originally posted by Inducker
A long way to go before NZ can even think of an upset , there's a fella named Gilchrist on the horizon and an upstart called Clarke...... |
Exactly and before all that they have to get rid of Gillespie. I know you'll think that won't be much of a task but even though his average is only 16 his average suration at the crease is 52 balls per innings so even if they do get him out it could be a fair while in the day's play.
Originally posted by Inducker
Still , a great effort from the Kiwis and another sterling effort from McGrath. |
Didn't you say a while back that Lee should come back into the Australian side ahead of McGrath? I think there is no question that he is now once again the world's greatest bowler, a spectacle that i doubt many would ever have prophesised about a year back before the tour of Zimbabwe when he spent about 8 months out of the game with an ankle injury.
Originally posted by Inducker
Should be a fascinating day tomorrow !! |
Yeah unfortunately i won't be able to see it as i have head back to London. And because of the timing i won't even get to see the finals days play in the India-Pakistan match.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 12:49pm |
Twasn't me about McGrath JAL !! He's THE class act in their seam bowling attack and I'm a huge fan (as much as I can be for an Aussie!). Kasper rightly held onto his place and they can't leave out Gillespie either.
Maybe they should leave out Gilchrist , put Lee in and not have a wicketkeeper - now that's innovative cricket!!!
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 12:51pm |
|
I think instead of Katich they should have gone with the 6 specialist batsmen and Lee as the 4th Seamer. Gillespie didn't pick up a wicket and before the match there was talk of him getting the boot but i doubt that'll happen.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 9:57pm |
Ponting falls early and Australia now 4 down. Oh dear.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 11 March 2005 at 11:28pm |
|
Gillespie has now gone scoring 12 of 73 deliveries. As i said he is a difficult batsman to dismiss! Interesting though to see whose hands the slowing down of the game plays into. For the mean time though that's accademic as Adam Gilchrist has walked to the crease.
|
 |
Guests
Starter
|
Posted: 12 March 2005 at 12:16am |
|
I think its fair to say that the Kiwis had the better of the first session but this is now where i expect Australia to come into their own. They've had a break for Lunch and with Gilchrist at the crease and with Clarke to come you'd expect them to start firing. Though they are still over 200 in arrears so if those two along with Katich who is at the crease at the moment go it could be curtains in this match for Australia.
|
 |