| Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
sam_ahmed
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4363
|
Topic: Pakistan v Australia (in England) Posted: 10 July 2010 at 7:09am |
|
well actually looking at both PAK and WI you get a feeling that they should have won a lot more than what they have been doing in last few years. Pak have been a bit better perhaps, but then WI very often play with second choice players. even today, I mean I don't know where is Taylor, Edwards, Darren Bravo, etc... so many of their players just disappear and we never get to know about them again.
You are right Mystery, we all seem to forget that PAK's fielding was one of the major causes of their horrendous tour down under. Drop Ponting on 0 and then he scores a double hundred, drop hussey several times and he scores a match winning 80 odd, I mean you cannot win matches like that can you?
|
|
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
|
 |
zuhair_abbasi
Number 3 Batsman
Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6202
|
Posted: 10 July 2010 at 8:43am |
|
You cannot and you wont this time either. Having fielders like Farhat, Butt and Kamran Akmal doesn't win you test matches.
|
 |
spin wizard
Opening Bowler
The world’s next great spinner
Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9453
|
Posted: 12 July 2010 at 10:36pm |
|
Quite right Zuhair, Pakistan would have had a much better series in NZ especially if they could have held on to catches.
|
|
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
|
 |
Sledger
Captain
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law !
Joined: 08 August 2005
Location: South Africa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15694
|
Posted: 13 July 2010 at 5:54am |
|
It'll be very tough for the Pakistanis , but they won't lack for support! Afridi is showing great enthusiasm as captain and let's hope that gives some confidence to an inexperienced side. The Aussies should win comfortably , bu the fickle English weather might play a major role.
|
|
Mental disintegration works for me !!
|
 |
zuhair_abbasi
Number 3 Batsman
Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6202
|
Posted: 13 July 2010 at 6:30am |
|
The team has been announced - strange that there is no mention on cricinfo. Umar AMin and Azhar Ali to debut. Strange they have left both Yasir and Malik - and instead persisting with Farhat. So 1-4 are all openers - Butt, Farhat, Amin and Azhar. Umar will bat at 5. This is no doubt the weakest Pakistan batting line I have ever seen in the 20 years of my cricket watching experience. God bless Afridi's men (boys).
|
 |
kahmad
First Slip
Joined: 21 May 2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 864
|
Posted: 13 July 2010 at 9:15am |
|
Yasir should have played this match. Malik could have help with his off spin but his batting isn't needed in test matches. Hopefully we can find another batsman like umar akmal from the new guys.
|
 |
zuhair_abbasi
Number 3 Batsman
Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6202
|
Posted: 13 July 2010 at 10:00am |
|
Yes it is a pretty bad selection. yasir should have been there. I dont see Pakistan making 300 in any of the innings.
|
 |
sam_ahmed
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4363
|
Posted: 13 July 2010 at 6:41pm |
|
Pakistan have asked a question here, how do you bat against Asif, Aamer, Gul and Kaneria under bowling friendly conditions?
Actually, I think Australia have done well to score 220 odd for 9. I'm sure any other country (perhaps except India) against this Pakistani attack under those conditions would have got bowled out for less than 150. All the bowlers were superb (except Afridi of course) that delivery by Asif to get rid of North was a beauty!
I expected Amin to play ahead of Yasir but never expected Malik to be dropped for Azhar Ali, that was indeed a surprise. Batting won't be easy for Pakistan either may be it'll be great if the sun comes out and conditions improve for batting. Either way, we have seen that Butt and Farhat have the ability to see off the new ball. they get off to very slow but solid starts, hopefully they can do the same again.
|
|
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
|
 |
spin wizard
Opening Bowler
The world’s next great spinner
Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9453
|
Posted: 14 July 2010 at 12:12am |
|
Pakistan has got a lovely bowling attack and with that guy name Mohammed Asif around, who I consider a great bowler, it's gonna be tough for teams against them. You may ask why call Asif great? Just tell me how many bowlers can move a ball both ways and create the kind of trouble he does with just roughly 80 MPH delivery. He's an architect at moving the ball around. Outstanding bowling average already and he's suppose to get wiser with age.
|
|
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
|
 |
mystery
Opener
Joined: 15 January 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2140
|
Posted: 14 July 2010 at 6:29am |
Originally posted by sam_ahmed
Pakistan have asked a question here, how do you bat against Asif, Aamer, Gul and Kaneria under bowling friendly conditions?
Actually, I think Australia have done well to score 220 odd for 9. I'm sure any other country (perhaps except India) against this Pakistani attack under those conditions would have got bowled out for less than 150. All the bowlers were superb (except Afridi of course) that delivery by Asif to get rid of North was a beauty!
I expected Amin to play ahead of Yasir but never expected Malik to be dropped for Azhar Ali, that was indeed a surprise. Batting won't be easy for Pakistan either may be it'll be great if the sun comes out and conditions improve for batting. Either way, we have seen that Butt and Farhat have the ability to see off the new ball. they get off to very slow but solid starts, hopefully they can do the same again.
|
I dont think its just about friendly conditions this attack can trouble batsman everywhere. 220 is not a bad score Pakistan might struggle to get 200 with this batting lineup. I dont know why there is no UDRS they have it for the England series not for this is just a terrible thing.
|
|
Rohit Sharma - What the world has seen is gear 1, gear speed 2,3,4,5,7,8,9 to be witnessed in IPL only.
|
 |
zuhair_abbasi
Number 3 Batsman
Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6202
|
Posted: 14 July 2010 at 6:39am |
|
I think Pakistan was brilliant with the ball but it was not unexpected - the unknown unseen will happen today. Seeing the inexperience in the batting line and having Afridi as early as 6 sends shivers down my spine.
|
 |
kahmad
First Slip
Joined: 21 May 2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 864
|
Posted: 14 July 2010 at 9:05am |
|
Pakistan need a good start from Salman and Farhat. It will be very tough for the youngsters under pressure to perform. Catching was good yesterday. The captaincy was also good. once Pakistan was on top Afridi went for the kill and got rewarded. I never saw 5 slips in last years in pakistani field. Afridi has given a strong message to all the players by leaving out Malik. Performance is important than name.
|
 |
sam_ahmed
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4363
|
Posted: 14 July 2010 at 6:21pm |
|
... and indeed a very very ordinary batting performance by Pakistan, cannot understand how can they win with such batting. The sun has indeed come out now and the Aussies are firmly on top at 84/2. I don't often lose hope no matter what the situation but seriously with 3 days of cricket still left and this kind of batting, I cannot see Pakistan saving or winning this one.
Salman Butt once again top scored with 63. Hardly anyone believed in his abilities not just on our forums but even in general, well, just see where is he now.
|
|
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
|
 |
sam_ahmed
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 27 November 2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4363
|
Posted: 14 July 2010 at 6:28pm |
|
and there is a good reason why I always say I rate Watson with the ball guys.
|
|
God is a better planner... so whenever u'r plan fails, cheer up... God has a better plan for you!
|
 |
robbie
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 19 September 2006
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1661
|
Posted: 14 July 2010 at 10:29pm |
|
i have seen azhar ali bat and i have to say he is a very good player and looking at his statistics he deserves a chance. if anything this should be positive as they are giving younger players a chance. they maybe should have put one further down the order as 3 and 4 are very important positions.
|
 |
mystery
Opener
Joined: 15 January 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2140
|
Posted: 14 July 2010 at 11:26pm |
|
Good to see you back Robbie. I think batting lineup is fine the only change needed is Farhat out Hameed or Malik in.
Edited by mystery - 14 July 2010 at 11:28pm
|
|
Rohit Sharma - What the world has seen is gear 1, gear speed 2,3,4,5,7,8,9 to be witnessed in IPL only.
|
 |
milkman
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 02 March 2009
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3077
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 4:48am |
Originally posted by zuhair_abbasi
I think Pakistan was brilliant with the ball but it was not unexpected - the unknown unseen will happen today. Seeing the inexperience in the batting line and having Afridi as early as 6 sends shivers down my spine. |
You were spot on here Zuhair. Pakistan is the only team you can get away with making 250 against, because they are very liable to scoring even less. Watson has shown some good stuff with the ball and now has a 5-for and ton against Pakistan to his name. I don't know how much that 5-for is worth, considering Hauritz already has 2 against Pakistan, but nonetheless it was an important contribution as Pakistan literally crumbled. No surprised at all on my part to see Katich and Butt among the runs, they are two solid grinders and the most underrated batsmen going around, certainly Katich is. Pakistan's pace battery is very , very solid. The spin looks decent, while Smith was not used at all for Australia. I must say, and I have said it before.... nothing is better than a match dominated by the bowlers and a low scoring affair. This is a 90s-esque match.
|
|
Ideal cricketer: Bowl like Warne, bat like Tendulkar, field like Jonty!!
|
 |
Sledger
Captain
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law !
Joined: 08 August 2005
Location: South Africa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15694
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 5:34am |
|
I'm enjoying this test , some fine performances by a number of players. As Milky said , low scoring affairs where the ball dominates are so much better to watch. The ball is swinging and seaming throughout and it's testing the batsmen's technique - quite a few have been found wanting. Play as late as possible with a shortened backlift and you can prosper. Katich's movement through the crease looks ungainly , but when he plays the ball he's nice and still. Butt also looked comfortable and I was surprised when that inswinging full delivery got through - I think he expected to pick up 4 through square leg ! Australia are favourites , but those late wickets have given Pakistan a sniff. If they can get through this morning and leave themselves 280 or so , we could have a terrific match on our hands. As an afterthought , can anyone tell me the last time an Aussie innings contained Ponting 0 and M.Hussey 0 ?
Edited by Sledger - 15 July 2010 at 5:35am
|
|
Mental disintegration works for me !!
|
 |
zuhair_abbasi
Number 3 Batsman
Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6202
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 7:12am |
|
No other team can this easily crack Aussies batting and still pretty much out of the game - this is just Pakistan. Katich has been superb, because he does not commit himself early unlike others. Pakistan can still wrap up the Australian innings under 200 as Sledge said, but there is no way Pakistan is going to make a contest out of it.
Another thing I noticed, without taking anything away from the Aussie bowlers who did bowl pretty well - I think Pakistan bowlers bowled more threatening spells throughout the game.
the selection of the batting line is also very poor - I don't know how many teams do they want to see Imran Farhat fail before dropping him for good. There was certainly a case of playing Hameed and Malik - I am not suggesting that they would have won it for Pakistan, but it surely would have been a lot better
|
 |
Clobber
Captain
Joined: 03 January 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8838
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 9:08am |
Originally posted by sam_ahmed
and there is a good reason why I always say I rate Watson with the ball guys. |
Inept batting being the good reason?
Seriously, being bowled out by Shane Watson should rank as a low point for any cricket side.
|
 |
milkman
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 02 March 2009
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3077
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 9:46am |
Originally posted by Clobber
Originally posted by sam_ahmed
and there is a good reason why I always say I rate Watson with the ball guys. |
Inept batting being the good reason?
Seriously, being bowled out by Shane Watson should rank as a low point for any cricket side. |
His batting has been very good as an opener, you have to give him that much. Certainly I'd take him before Alistair Cook... ... and his bowling is not half bad if he's your 4th seamer in the side, especially when the team is risking playing an unheralded spinner.
|
|
Ideal cricketer: Bowl like Warne, bat like Tendulkar, field like Jonty!!
|
 |
kahmad
First Slip
Joined: 21 May 2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 864
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 9:50am |
|
thats true. It was really bad batting from the pakistani. Afridi was picking him with ease, but he failed to understand the game of test cricket. He was still playing T20. He could have easily stay at the wicket as he was the last recognized batsman. Australia can declare now as Pakistan can never reach 200 in these conditions. Even with Inzamam, Yousuf, Younis Pakistan was unable to score 300 against Australia.
|
 |
zuhair_abbasi
Number 3 Batsman
Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6202
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 10:04am |
|
This match could be over as early as today. Watson bowled ok but it was the inept batting as Clobs rightly pointed out that gave hi the place on the honor's board.
|
 |
mystery
Opener
Joined: 15 January 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2140
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 10:39am |
Originally posted by Clobber
Originally posted by sam_ahmed
and there is a good reason why I always say I rate Watson with the ball guys. |
Inept batting being the good reason?
Seriously, being bowled out by Shane Watson should rank as a low point for any cricket side. |
I think Watson is still better than most of the bowlers currently playing in the England side apart from Broad and Anderson.
|
|
Rohit Sharma - What the world has seen is gear 1, gear speed 2,3,4,5,7,8,9 to be witnessed in IPL only.
|
 |
mystery
Opener
Joined: 15 January 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2140
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 10:41am |
Originally posted by kahmad
thats true. It was really bad batting from the pakistani. Afridi was picking him with ease, but he failed to understand the game of test cricket. He was still playing T20. He could have easily stay at the wicket as he was the last recognized batsman. Australia can declare now as Pakistan can never reach 200 in these conditions. Even with Inzamam, Yousuf, Younis Pakistan was unable to score 300 against Australia.
|
I think its better to make quick 30 than get out on slow 20.
Most teams were struggling to get to 300 at that time when Aussies had Warne and McGrath.
Edited by mystery - 15 July 2010 at 10:44am
|
|
Rohit Sharma - What the world has seen is gear 1, gear speed 2,3,4,5,7,8,9 to be witnessed in IPL only.
|
 |
kirankri
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 21 November 2007
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1088
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 12:39pm |
Originally posted by mystery
Originally posted by Clobber
Originally posted by sam_ahmed
and there is a good reason why I always say I rate Watson with the ball guys. |
Inept batting being the good reason?
Seriously, being bowled out by Shane Watson should rank as a low point for any cricket side. |
I think Watson is still better than most of the bowlers currently playing in the England side apart from Broad and Anderson. |
Why did England side come into picture here?
|
 |
Clobber
Captain
Joined: 03 January 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8838
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 1:02pm |
|
it's a mystery....
|
 |
kahmad
First Slip
Joined: 21 May 2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 864
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 1:34pm |
Originally posted by mystery
Originally posted by kahmad
thats true. It was really bad batting from the pakistani. Afridi was picking him with ease, but he failed to understand the game of test cricket. He was still playing T20. He could have easily stay at the wicket as he was the last recognized batsman. Australia can declare now as Pakistan can never reach 200 in these conditions. Even with Inzamam, Yousuf, Younis Pakistan was unable to score 300 against Australia.
|
I think its better to make quick 30 than get out on slow 20.
Most teams were struggling to get to 300 at that time when Aussies had Warne and McGrath. |
I dont agree with that. slow 20 would be better. Its about a partnership. With a slow 20 the other batsman can also score 15 to 20 runs. for slow 20 the bowler has to work hard for the wicket. Afridi scored 31 in a partnership of maybe 33 runs. The batting must play more overs to give rest to their bowlers. Pakistani bowlers had to bowl again after 40 overs.
|
 |
zuhair_abbasi
Number 3 Batsman
Joined: 19 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6202
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 2:24pm |
|
Not many teams dismiss Australia near 250 twice in 3 days - but the side that does will end up losing - what a shame. How I wish we have the two Ys back
|
 |
kahmad
First Slip
Joined: 21 May 2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 864
|
Posted: 15 July 2010 at 2:51pm |
|
its not the 2 Ys. They can help but not win. Its the mindset of the pakistani batsmen. since 15 years they didn't win a test against Australia with Inzamam, Younus, Yousuf. They are not so strong in test cricket.
|
 |