Print Page | Close Window

Clarke or Razzaq

Printed From: Cricket World
Category: Letter To The Editor
Forum Name: Cricket World Ratings
Forum Discription: Who is the Most Valuable Player?
URL: http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1475
Printed Date: 19 May 2013 at 3:10pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Clarke or Razzaq
Posted By: masterblaster
Subject: Clarke or Razzaq
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 1:50am
I am an Aussie and I deeply like Clarke but this Razzaq guy has pure talent who do you think is better.

-------------
AUSSIE RULESSS!!! WE GOT THE WORLD CUP AGAIN NEXT YEAR!!!



Replies:
Posted By: skip_eng
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 1:51am
clarkey

-------------
Ashley Giles took three good wickets, outbowling Shane Warne who matched him in the scorebook, but not on the field

Best quote ever! Source: Cricinfo


Posted By: masterblaster
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 1:54am
Back up your opinion with facts please.

-------------
AUSSIE RULESSS!!! WE GOT THE WORLD CUP AGAIN NEXT YEAR!!!


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:01am

batting,bowling,allrounder in what if its bowling and all rounder razzaq if batting clarke



-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: -JP-
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:04am
Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE

batting,bowling,allrounder in what if its bowling and all rounder razzaq if batting clarke

Sorry?!



Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:11am
razzaqs the better bowler clarke is the better fielder and batter does tha make sence this time

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: masterblaster
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:23am
It makes perfect sense Anil but Razzaq has made important knowck for the Paki's he also has more expeirience in tests and in one day but Clarke is a better fileder and helps the Aussies Razzaq helps Pakistan many times in important situations. Razzaq is the reason pakistan's lower order is alive.

-------------
AUSSIE RULESSS!!! WE GOT THE WORLD CUP AGAIN NEXT YEAR!!!


Posted By: Clapo
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:32am

hmmmmmmmmmm........ it's hard to compare two players who have completely different roles.... Razzaq is an allrounder, clarke is a batsman

Seems pretty straight foward, Clarke is the better batsmen and Fielder, and razzaq is the better bowler case closed



-------------
5-0 You Beauty!!!!!

Thanks for the many fantastic memories Marto, Langer, Warney & Pidg


Posted By: masterblaster
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:33am
I think Razzaq Is in Clarke's league they are both amazing and deserve to be compared.

-------------
AUSSIE RULESSS!!! WE GOT THE WORLD CUP AGAIN NEXT YEAR!!!


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:52am
if you had to pick then razzaq hes the complete package

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: masterblaster
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 2:58am
Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE

if you had to pick then razzaq hes the complete package


Well said Anil Well said true he is the complete package.

-------------
AUSSIE RULESSS!!! WE GOT THE WORLD CUP AGAIN NEXT YEAR!!!


Posted By: Charlie
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:30am
michael clarke for me but when he is given the chance to perform he doesnt. recently at the bangladesh game he scored low scores. but i still think he should get a place since he is still young.


Posted By: Clapo
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:38am

was only 1 match, and lets not forget that only ponting, gilly and haydos made good scores for australia in that match.



-------------
5-0 You Beauty!!!!!

Thanks for the many fantastic memories Marto, Langer, Warney & Pidg


Posted By: Sledger
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:50am
Originally posted by masterblaster

Back up your opinion with facts please.


That's rather cheeky , seeing YOU posted the thread without any facts whatsoever! Saying you "deeply" like Clarke suggests you want to marry him - it says absolutely zilch about his cricketing prowess.

These threads annoy me , Clarke and Razzak have nothing in common and play the game in a completely different fashion.



-------------
Mental disintegration works for me !!


Posted By: Sledger
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:51am
Originally posted by -JP-

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE


batting,bowling,allrounder in what if its bowling and all rounder razzaq if batting clarke



Sorry?!



I stared at that for a full 10 minutes JP and all I got was a severe migraine!!

-------------
Mental disintegration works for me !!


Posted By: Clapo
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 6:54am

Originally posted by Sledger

Originally posted by masterblaster

Back up your opinion with facts please.


That's rather cheeky , seeing YOU posted the thread without any facts whatsoever! Saying you "deeply" like Clarke suggests you want to marry him - it says absolutely zilch about his cricketing prowess.

These threads annoy me , Clarke and Razzak have nothing in common and play the game in a completely different fashion.

my point exactly



-------------
5-0 You Beauty!!!!!

Thanks for the many fantastic memories Marto, Langer, Warney & Pidg


Posted By: Jay dee
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 3:28pm
Razzak and Clarke and exactly a comparison, it should have been between Razzak and Kallis.


Posted By: jumbo
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 7:05pm
razzaq is an excellent player and i rank him  higher than clarke. he is a proven performer. his bowling is good and his explosive batting can change the course of the game. he is a powerful hitter. clarke's fielding and batting is very good but he has still not played so many matches. he has to prove himself in many years to come. he is still young and i think he can become a great player in future. but as of now razzaq is better.


Posted By: masterblaster
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 10:51pm
Originally posted by Sledger

Originally posted by masterblaster

Back up your opinion with facts please.


That's rather cheeky , seeing YOU posted the thread without any facts whatsoever! Saying you "deeply" like Clarke suggests you want to marry him - it says absolutely zilch about his cricketing prowess.

These threads annoy me , Clarke and Razzak have nothing in common and play the game in a completely different fashion.



Sorry mate. You might as well know I am new here. You banned me before and I am trying to be nicer this time.

-------------
AUSSIE RULESSS!!! WE GOT THE WORLD CUP AGAIN NEXT YEAR!!!


Posted By: abubakar52
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 10:57pm
Originally posted by Sledger

Originally posted by -JP-

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE


batting,bowling,allrounder in what if its bowling and all rounder razzaq if batting clarke



Sorry?!



I stared at that for a full 10 minutes JP and all I got was a severe migraine!!


I understand this it means. The three things for an all-rounder are batting, bolwing= all-rounder. So he said if its bowling all-rounder then razzaq. If batting all-rounder Clark.


Posted By: -JP-
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 11:00pm

Originally posted by masterblaster

Sorry mate. You might as well know I am new here. You banned me before and I am trying to be nicer this time.

Seems someone has misunderstood the idea of being banned.



Posted By: abubakar52
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 11:13pm
Hi -JP-

If you are banned you are not supposed to come back right?


Posted By: -JP-
Date Posted: 13 April 2006 at 11:53pm
You're not supposed to circumvent the ban, no.


Posted By: masterblaster
Date Posted: 14 April 2006 at 2:54am
Look I'm back and I'm nice now. Isn't that respectable.

Over all I think Razzaq is better.

-------------
AUSSIE RULESSS!!! WE GOT THE WORLD CUP AGAIN NEXT YEAR!!!


Posted By: abubakar52
Date Posted: 14 April 2006 at 3:05am
Yea I think because he has played more mathces therefore he has more experience.


Posted By: MiNiWaRnEy
Date Posted: 14 April 2006 at 4:56am
Why in the first place are you comparing clarke and razzaq..Two completely different cricketers in some aspects.

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz - http://www.webwiz.co.uk