Print Page | Close Window

Warne v MacGill

Printed From: Cricket World
Category: Letter To The Editor
Forum Name: Cricket World Ratings
Forum Discription: Who is the Most Valuable Player?
URL: http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628
Printed Date: 20 May 2013 at 10:37am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Warne v MacGill
Posted By: quicky
Subject: Warne v MacGill
Date Posted: 27 April 2006 at 9:58pm
both these spinners are top class and i know you can say shane is the better spinner and i would just have to look at one of his 5 wicket hauls to see but i think stuart macgill could have been as good as warne if it werent for warne if you get what i mean. If stuart played for any other team he would have 500+ wickets easily but because and only because he plays for aus he has 200. Every time he plays along side warne he seems to get more wickets than him in a match what do you guys think about macgill



Replies:
Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 27 April 2006 at 10:45pm
OK this has already been posted about please read forum before posting a new topic


Posted By: cricket_mstr
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 12:27am

Warne way more succesful and the better bowler.

Warne is way more smarter in his bowling than MacGil, and I don't think MacGil is as liked amongst the team as Warney

 



-------------
Cricket watcher but tennis player :)


Posted By: -JP-
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 12:44am

Originally posted by darlo_lad

OK this has already been posted about please read forum before posting a new topic

Strange as it may seem, we don't appear to have any open Warne v MacGill threads, so this one can stay it is. I'll change the thread title though.



-------------


Posted By: crownmethod
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 3:58am

http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1397&PN=1 - http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1397&a mp;PN=1



Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 6:45am
MacGill is a class leg spinner and very unlucky not to play more tests

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: mazzybabe.uk
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 8:19am
Originally posted by -JP-

Originally posted by darlo_lad

OK this has already been posted about please read forum before posting a new topic

Strange as it may seem, we don't appear to have any open Warne v MacGill threads, so this one can stay it is. I'll change the thread title though.

Isn't there a  better leggie topic I know because I put about a 5 page long post in there



-------------
The First Century I ever saw was Heschelle Gibbs' 228 against Pakistan


Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 10:58am
There is a topic about better leggie, which has this exact same idea of Warne vs McGill.


Posted By: quicky
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 10:34pm
now now darling i was just trying to narrow it down to just these 2 if that is ok the other one involves all the leggies i am asking about how successfull macgill would have been if it werent for shane warne


Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 29 April 2006 at 10:35am
Sorry "darling", but if you read the topic you will see it is clearly about Warne and McGill.


Posted By: quicky
Date Posted: 30 April 2006 at 11:14pm
darlo_las read wot i just said ffs, i am asking how successful macgill would have been if it werent for warne not who is the better leggie, just coz the title involves the same men doesnt mean it is the same thread


Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 01 May 2006 at 11:11am
sorry quicky, i was just stating that the two topics are quite similar. No need to get so defensive


Posted By: widdleman
Date Posted: 27 July 2008 at 1:02pm
Warne by a street the reason why McGill got so many wickets was because of the Warne factor, the mystisim surrounding leg spinners McGill had 2 deliveries a leg break and a googly as where Warne had them all.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz - http://www.webwiz.co.uk