Warne v MacGill
Printed From: Cricket World
Category: Letter To The Editor
Forum Name: Cricket World Ratings
Forum Discription: Who is the Most Valuable Player?
URL: http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1628
Printed Date: 20 May 2013 at 10:37am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Warne v MacGill
Posted By: quicky
Subject: Warne v MacGill
Date Posted: 27 April 2006 at 9:58pm
| both these spinners are top class and i know you can say shane is the better spinner and i would just have to look at one of his 5 wicket hauls to see but i think stuart macgill could have been as good as warne if it werent for warne if you get what i mean. If stuart played for any other team he would have 500+ wickets easily but because and only because he plays for aus he has 200. Every time he plays along side warne he seems to get more wickets than him in a match what do you guys think about macgill |
Replies:
Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 27 April 2006 at 10:45pm
| OK this has already been posted about please read forum before posting a new topic |
Posted By: cricket_mstr
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 12:27am
|
Warne way more succesful and the better bowler. Warne is way more smarter in his bowling than MacGil, and I don't think MacGil is as liked amongst the team as Warney
------------- Cricket watcher but tennis player :) |
Posted By: -JP-
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 12:44am
|
Strange as it may seem, we don't appear to have any open Warne v MacGill threads, so this one can stay it is. I'll change the thread title though. ------------- |
Posted By: crownmethod
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 3:58am
|
http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1397&PN=1 - http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1397&a mp;PN=1
|
Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 6:45am
|
MacGill is a class leg spinner and very unlucky not to play more tests ------------- Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though... |
Posted By: mazzybabe.uk
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 8:19am
Isn't there a better leggie topic I know because I put about a 5 page long post in there ------------- The First Century I ever saw was Heschelle Gibbs' 228 against Pakistan |
Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 10:58am
| There is a topic about better leggie, which has this exact same idea of Warne vs McGill. |
Posted By: quicky
Date Posted: 28 April 2006 at 10:34pm
| now now darling i was just trying to narrow it down to just these 2 if that is ok the other one involves all the leggies i am asking about how successfull macgill would have been if it werent for shane warne |
Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 29 April 2006 at 10:35am
| Sorry "darling", but if you read the topic you will see it is clearly about Warne and McGill. |
Posted By: quicky
Date Posted: 30 April 2006 at 11:14pm
| darlo_las read wot i just said ffs, i am asking how successful macgill would have been if it werent for warne not who is the better leggie, just coz the title involves the same men doesnt mean it is the same thread |
Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 01 May 2006 at 11:11am
| sorry quicky, i was just stating that the two topics are quite similar. No need to get so defensive |
Posted By: widdleman
Date Posted: 27 July 2008 at 1:02pm
| Warne by a street the reason why McGill got so many wickets was because of the Warne factor, the mystisim surrounding leg spinners McGill had 2 deliveries a leg break and a googly as where Warne had them all. |