Who has the best bowling attack in ODIs
Printed From: Cricket World
Category: Letter To The Editor
Forum Name: Cricket World Ratings
Forum Discription: Who is the Most Valuable Player?
URL: http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2990
Printed Date: 19 May 2013 at 4:21pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Who has the best bowling attack in ODIs
Posted By: Vipera russelli
Subject: Who has the best bowling attack in ODIs
Date Posted: 23 January 2007 at 8:46am
Which team bosts of the best bowling attack in ODIs? It has to be effective on all conditions.
Austrailia - very disciplined and lethal pace attack, who can rip apart any side. lacks a good spinner (get Brad Hogg in boys)
Bangladesh - promising seam attack of Shadat Hossain and Mashrafe Mortaza. The three pron left arm spin is capable of strangling any side. But they lack performances in death overs
England - Looks a good attack on paper (with addition of panesar), but taken to the cleaners if the pitch does not offer help.
India - Apart for Kumble and Zahir Khan and Harbhajan on a slow wicket others are useless.
New Zealand - promising fast attack, speraheaded by Bond and good spin support by Vettori and Patel, once again tends to be taken apart in relatively flat pitches.
Pakistan - Threatening seam attack with seamers, swinger and express pacers, probably the best fast attack after SA, but lacks a wicket taking spinner in the ranks like Saqlain.
Sri Lanka - Most complete ODI bowling attack, swing bowler, seam bowler, fast bowler, slinger, offie and a left armer as front liners.
South Africa - Best sean attack is here which can send best of batting lines tottering. But lacks a spinner and liable for serious caning on slow wickets.
West Indies - Taylor and Bravo promising, but overrated. Bradshaw is magnificient. Needs lot of improvement.
My money is on Austrailia or Pakistan (and Sri Lanka if the pitch is marginally slow)
|
Replies:
Posted By: SL lion
Date Posted: 23 January 2007 at 8:53am
|
i reckon ausis and sri lanka.
|
Posted By: spin wizard
Date Posted: 23 January 2007 at 5:51pm
|
Originally posted by VR
West Indies - Taylor and Bravo promising, but overrated |
Oh god, who ever rated them high??? Over rated my foot!
Anyways, my answer is none other than the Mighty Aussies!!! McGrath, Bracken, Lee, - Also Johnson and Clark to back up! Simply great!!
------------- In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
|
Posted By: BOBBI
Date Posted: 25 January 2007 at 3:08pm
New Zealand are finally discovering some pace
------------- Judge the player not by their stats, but by their opposition.
|
Posted By: 70_degree_spin
Date Posted: 25 January 2007 at 3:21pm
I went for Sri Lanka because of their depth and options.
Vaas. LFM Malinga. RF Fernando. RFM Murali. OS Jayasuriya. SLA Mahroof. RFM
So many options and are all potential match winners.
------------- [
|
Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 25 January 2007 at 3:41pm
|
I agree, I also like to add Kaushal Lokuarachchi & Malinga Bandara to that list.
|
Posted By: SL lion
Date Posted: 25 January 2007 at 7:37pm
Originally posted by 70_degree_spin
I went for Sri Lanka because of their depth and options.
Vaas. LFM Malinga. RF Fernando. RFM Murali. OS Jayasuriya. SLA Mahroof. RFM
So many options and are all potential match winners.
|
dont forget thilakarathna dhilshan. he can be very useful too.
|
Posted By: MalikBrother
Date Posted: 25 January 2007 at 11:14pm
Pakistan has best bowling attack now so far such as Shoaib Akhtar, Mohammad Asif and Umar Gul - Dont forget the Shabbir Ahmed who is coming back after long time --
Pakistan is the second team to have best attack after Austrailia Then after Pakistan , it s South Africa and New Zealand
|
Posted By: sl_crew
Date Posted: 26 January 2007 at 3:40am
AUS all the way
------------- dont mess with us...... sana rulz
|
Posted By: spin wizard
Date Posted: 26 January 2007 at 6:02pm
Originally posted by malikbrother
Pakistan has best bowling attack now so far such as Shoaib Akhtar, Mohammad Asif and Umar Gul - Dont forget the Shabbir Ahmed who is coming back after long time -- |
Originally posted by malikbrother
Pakistan is the second team to have best attack after Austrailia |
Biggest contradiction ever!!
------------- In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
|
Posted By: dips_december
Date Posted: 27 January 2007 at 5:16am
Its Australia and then Pakistan .Shoaib ,Asif ,Gul ,Naved ,Razzaq and Kaneria make a good attack .
-------------
|
Posted By: joelza1990
Date Posted: 27 January 2007 at 11:00am
|
A few years ago i would have said Pakistan. But Australia are miles ahead now But ive always liked New Zealand with the ball in there hand.
|
Posted By: Italian Cricket
Date Posted: 27 January 2007 at 11:14am
|
It has to be Australia.
With the retirement of Warne and McGrath the test team will slightly suffer but with the upper coming talent of the Aussies ODI squad they still hold the best bowling attack in the world.
You dont get to top of the world by just batting, lucky for the aussies they are amazing on all areas of the one day game!
------------- Italian cricket captain of the future!!
|
Posted By: spin wizard
Date Posted: 27 January 2007 at 10:17pm
|
That's true! Their batting is fantastic, their bowling is superb and their fielding is magnificent!!
------------- In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
|
Posted By: MP12
Date Posted: 27 January 2007 at 10:57pm
Sri Lanka have a very balanced bowling attack, left and right hand combinations, off spinners, fast bowlers and part time bowlers. Australia would be next but they need to improve Cameron White. I've seen him bowl he usually bowls very well, he just needs a few international scalps to get his cofidence up.
New Zealand are a bowling team, the've found good fast men and have Vettori and Petel to take wickets when needed.
-------------
|
Posted By: 70_degree_spin
Date Posted: 28 January 2007 at 1:56pm
Originally posted by SL lion
Originally posted by 70_degree_spin
I went for Sri Lanka because of their depth and options.
Vaas. LFM Malinga. RF Fernando. RFM Murali. OS Jayasuriya. SLA Mahroof. RFM
So many options and are all potential match winners.
|
dont forget thilakarathna dhilshan. he can be very useful too. |
Dilshan a dangerous bowler?? You must be thinking of someone else.
------------- [
|
Posted By: minimurali
Date Posted: 28 January 2007 at 5:01pm
|
He said useful not dangerous.
I also agree about Australia - however they bowled fairly poorly yesterday in the Commonwealth VB series against New Zealand. Overall they've been bowling brilliantly of late.
------------- County Sim on extended break until I've got less work and more free time. When I have a specific date, I'll post it in the thread.
|
Posted By: SL lion
Date Posted: 28 January 2007 at 7:54pm
Originally posted by 70_degree_spin
Originally posted by SL lion
Originally posted by 70_degree_spin
I went for Sri Lanka because of their depth and options.
Vaas. LFM Malinga. RF Fernando. RFM Murali. OS Jayasuriya. SLA Mahroof. RFM
So many options and are all potential match winners.
|
dont forget thilakarathna dhilshan. he can be very useful too. |
Dilshan a dangerous bowler?? You must be thinking of someone else.
|
he is not a dangerous bowler but he doesnt give runs easily.
|
Posted By: SL lion
Date Posted: 04 February 2007 at 11:22am
Originally posted by MalikBrother
Pakistan has best bowling attack now so far such as Shoaib Akhtar, Mohammad Asif and Umar Gul - Dont forget the Shabbir Ahmed who is coming back after long time --
Pakistan is the second team to have best attack after Austrailia Then after Pakistan , it s South Africa and New Zealand
|
i dont know about before but from today on pakisthan has da worst bowling attack in da world....(after seen da first odi between pak and SA)
|
Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 04 February 2007 at 12:12pm
|
stop typing gibberish like "da" - either use proper words or don't bother posting at all
|
Posted By: MalikBrother
Date Posted: 05 February 2007 at 5:09am
Originally posted by SL lion
Originally posted by MalikBrother
Pakistan has best bowling attack now so far such as Shoaib Akhtar, Mohammad Asif and Umar Gul - Dont forget the Shabbir Ahmed who is coming back after long time --
Pakistan is the second team to have best attack after Austrailia Then after Pakistan , it s South Africa and New Zealand
|
i dont know about before but from today on pakisthan has da worst bowling attack in da world....(after seen da first odi between pak and SA) |
wht u guys talking abt -- Pakistan is currently playing without Gul , Shabbir Ahmed and Shoaib Akhtar ---- that s why Pakistan looks weak without them --- wait for them in WC -- Meanwhile Pakistan is just trying to use new bowlers like Sami and Rana to experiement -- Beside Pakistan is playing with one bowler is Asif - u cant expect to have better attack without Shoaib Akhtar and the rest of them --- Dont forget it was flat track -- watch out for next match against SA -- Hopefully, it will be bouncy track -- Not sure if pakistan may win but it s gonna be tough
|
Posted By: BOBBI
Date Posted: 07 February 2007 at 9:55am
Pakistan has held on of the most potent attacks for the last two decades but has wone very few mportant games so therefore their attack cannot be seen as dangerous because as soon as the pressure valve is applied they roll over.
------------- Judge the player not by their stats, but by their opposition.
|
Posted By: MalikBrother
Date Posted: 07 February 2007 at 9:20pm
|
Inspite of Pakistan playing without full strength like Akhtar and Gul, but Pakistan still won the match against SA in 2nd ODI -- just imagine if Pakistan have full strength in WC - the result would be different and definitely, the result will go favor for Pakistan
|
Posted By: spin wizard
Date Posted: 07 February 2007 at 10:46pm
Oh boy, the Windies don't have the best bowling attack and still win matches. ODI is a funny game, the best in the business isn't really required to win but it would do real wonders if they are in the side.
------------- In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
|
Posted By: Lion Heart
Date Posted: 07 February 2007 at 11:11pm
|
Pakistan has got match winning individuals, only thing that is needed to make this team win is to keep them jointed and to form them like a gel team. If they could get the form of gel, no one can beat them in this world cup. From: Lion Heart
|
Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 08 February 2007 at 9:16am
|
This constant dribbling about how much talent Pakistan has and they can beat any team in the world is total crap and needs to stop. Almost ANY team in the world can beat any other team on their day - just look through the history of the game.
|
Posted By: abubakar52
Date Posted: 08 February 2007 at 4:21pm
I think someone has multiple acounts
|
Posted By: 70_degree_spin
Date Posted: 09 February 2007 at 7:38pm
you dont hear any of the aussie members saying that sort of rubbish even though it is closer to the truth than this Pakistan rubbish.
------------- [
|
Posted By: Vipera russelli
Date Posted: 10 February 2007 at 7:07am
Strange, South Africa has no votes!
------------- Diuretics are used to look good in TV shows
|
Posted By: Tom_da_Cat
Date Posted: 06 March 2007 at 7:09am
It's Sri Lanka.The balance of their bowling attack is really outstanding.
------------- http://www.nivahana.com
|
Posted By: mhj007
Date Posted: 12 March 2007 at 5:35am
i think bangladesh.
Junior
|
Posted By: bang
Date Posted: 12 March 2007 at 5:55am
|
you think bungladesh base on what?
|
Posted By: bondy
Date Posted: 19 March 2007 at 11:14am
Bangladesh? hahahahaha
------------- Good one Graham!
|
Posted By: 143no
Date Posted: 19 March 2007 at 12:21pm
|
Its no funnier that the 6 who voted for pakistan.
------------- Monkey see, Monkey do.
|
Posted By: EnglandFan
Date Posted: 22 March 2007 at 5:59pm
Originally posted by 143no
Its no funnier that the 6 who voted for pakistan. |
uhhh
Mohammed Asif
Shoiab Akhtar
Umar Gul
Ifthikar Rao
Danish Kaneria
Your comment doesnt make any sense :/
Pakistan have definately got an extremly strong bowling attack or even the best bowling attack if all the bowlers are present.
|
Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 22 March 2007 at 7:44pm
|
I must've missed the first two's appearance at the World Cup then
|
Posted By: EnglandFan
Date Posted: 23 March 2007 at 5:46pm
|
Well there main two bowlers were missing, i mean lets say flintoff and panesar or harmison and hoggard were missing our bowling attack would be more horrendous than it already is. personally i believe they have the best bowling attack if everyone is fit thats just my opninon, i cant really see a better attack since som eof the austrialians have retired.
|
Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 23 March 2007 at 5:51pm
|
Hoggard and Harmison don't play ODI's for England as it is
|
Posted By: EnglandFan
Date Posted: 23 March 2007 at 11:07pm
|
I wasnt talking about odi's i was talking about our bowling attack in general.
|
Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 23 March 2007 at 11:53pm
|
In the recent Ashes Panesar wasn't in the team for a couple of games, and Harmison might as well not have been, and look how well......ermmmmm...the thread's about ODI's
|
Posted By: blaster17
Date Posted: 28 April 2007 at 10:38pm
|
Australia Yes.. But Look At India With There Young Fast Bowlers They Are Ermagin Very Quick
|
Posted By: sammythola7
Date Posted: 18 May 2007 at 11:00am
It has to be Sri Lanka, well Aussies have the edge too. I wud say the two teams are far apart from the rest of the world when it comes to bowling attack. SL has an edge over Aussies coz I still dont understand what is Wtson doing in that line up, and I dont think Tait is agood gamble.
------------- Your Fear in a snake is your faith in the snake's ability to bite you.
|
Posted By: MadMax
Date Posted: 20 May 2007 at 11:22am
Originally posted by sammythola7
It has to be Sri Lanka, well Aussies have the edge too. I wud say the two teams are far apart from the rest of the world when it comes to bowling attack. SL has an edge over Aussies coz I still dont understand what is Wtson doing in that line up, and I dont think Tait is agood gamble. | The same question can be asked what Fernando is doing in that line up. He should be replaced with a guy like Ishara Amerasinghe or Prabath Nissanka (latter same pace as Fernando, but lot accurate)
------------- You can wake up that who are asleep, but not who are pretending to be asleep
|
Posted By: sammythola7
Date Posted: 28 May 2007 at 11:38am
He can be a better bowler than Watson, to me in fact he is, just needs to work on his ru-up, coz pace and line are there.
------------- Your Fear in a snake is your faith in the snake's ability to bite you.
|
Posted By: samhache
Date Posted: 29 May 2007 at 9:47am
the two best attacks in the world currently are either Australia or Sri Lanka. But i would lean on the sri lankan side. This can be justified through their two huge strike weapons - Lasith malinga and Murali. Two world class bowlers. Also Vaas is world class, the other bowlers arent so good but i spose still hold their own.
------------- Warriors!!
|
Posted By: MP12
Date Posted: 29 May 2007 at 11:14am
Congradulations on 200 posts samhache, I agree although Australia might be on the wane seeing as without McGrath's preformances Lee and Tait will have to become more consistant.
-------------
|
|