Print Page | Close Window

Why are the Aussies the best?

Printed From: Cricket World
Category: Letter To The Editor
Forum Name: Cricket World Ratings
Forum Discription: Who is the Most Valuable Player?
URL: http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=640
Printed Date: 19 June 2013 at 10:32am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Why are the Aussies the best?
Posted By: Big Josh
Subject: Why are the Aussies the best?
Date Posted: 31 December 2005 at 8:22pm
 Simply coz every1 who plays in that team is really proud to wer thier jersey.They all play their part n bak each other up {eg. if the top order doesnt perform Gilli n Lee bat well}.The Aussies knw that if they dnt perform they r gna get dropped{eg Clarke,Martyn,Katich}, unlyk in oytha teams players who are nt performing well are kept in the team{eg.Boje}"sorry man bt u do nutin for SA"



Replies:
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 01 January 2006 at 1:00am
So, what's your point. We know the Aussies are the best, but I can tell you that they won't be the best in about 5 years time.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: Pakman
Date Posted: 01 January 2006 at 8:16pm

Too many politics involved as well, its ruined the pakistan team for years. Not till the Inzamam/Woolmar era has it sorted itself out.

Before it was the Waqar and Wasim AND friends team.

Not only that, they probably go into each match like Premiership Football Managers do, study each oponent and their tactics for the coming matches.



-------------
Some great cricketing quotes:

"It's tough for a natural hooker to give it up." - Ian Chappell
"On the outfield, hundreds of small boys are playing with their balls." - Rex Alston, BBC




Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 01 January 2006 at 10:43pm
I completely agree with you. Politics has been the main source of ruining Pakistani cricket for years. Inzamam and Woolmer have brought a huge change into the Pakistan team and I commend them for that.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: shan
Date Posted: 02 January 2006 at 7:49am

Yeah credi goes to Inzi & the Coach. But there is another imp. point to note. Previously out of 11 players in Pakistani Team, there used to be 6 or 7 captains. So how could it become a good team. Presently induction of youth in the team and not relying on any one player, has brought the dramatic change.

So far as Aussies as a best team as concerned, i think they were the best because they were really a team in its true spirit. TEAM Play was the key to success. Its was partiular with Aussies that despite having their wicket falling after regualr intervals, they never let the run rate down and finally a good partnership enabled them to pile up a huge total. Best in batting, fielding, bowling and team play.



-------------
"Excellence is something we can reach for; perfection is God's business."


Posted By: MiNiWaRnEy
Date Posted: 02 January 2006 at 10:13am

Originally posted by Big Josh

 Simply coz every1 who plays in that team is really proud to wer thier jersey.They all play their part n bak each other up {eg. if the top order doesnt perform Gilli n Lee bat well}.The Aussies knw that if they dnt perform they r gna get dropped{eg Clarke,Martyn,Katich}, unlyk in oytha teams players who are nt performing well are kept in the team{eg.Boje}"sorry man bt u do nutin for SA"

LOLLLLL

Boje is useless isnt he, he is used as a front line spinner when he even said himself that he is a middle order batsmen that can bowl occasional spin, he is as good as a part timer. HE bowls very defensive aswell. Plain useless. Also Hamish Marshall y the hell stick with him???



-------------


Posted By: shan
Date Posted: 02 January 2006 at 11:24am

Would u pls let me know, if politics is involved in Aussies Team selection?



-------------
"Excellence is something we can reach for; perfection is God's business."


Posted By: MiNiWaRnEy
Date Posted: 02 January 2006 at 11:46am
No way. All decisions made are rational. NO politics whatsoever.

-------------


Posted By: Pakman
Date Posted: 02 January 2006 at 3:11pm

hence their success.

Most pakistani players look out for number 1 *cough*shoaib*cough*afridi*cough*sami*cough*wasim*cough*

Waqar*cough*most players in past few years*cough

Sorry about that, a rage of coughing that could not be helped

The Pakistani team, you gotta love 'em, never seen a more comical team.



-------------
Some great cricketing quotes:

"It's tough for a natural hooker to give it up." - Ian Chappell
"On the outfield, hundreds of small boys are playing with their balls." - Rex Alston, BBC




Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 02 January 2006 at 9:05pm
Ok, Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis were great players and were number 1.

I don't care what you say about the rest but Wasim and Waqar were great.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: Pakman
Date Posted: 02 January 2006 at 9:59pm
they were great, but they are also the reason for failure, they didnt allow new blood to get into the team, hence their abissmal performance until inzy became captain.

-------------
Some great cricketing quotes:

"It's tough for a natural hooker to give it up." - Ian Chappell
"On the outfield, hundreds of small boys are playing with their balls." - Rex Alston, BBC




Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 03 January 2006 at 3:14am
Yea, that's true.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: robdawg
Date Posted: 21 January 2006 at 3:24pm
because they have andrew symonds


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 12:46am
Aussies are best because they have Andrew Symonds? That's completely wrong.

Aussies are best because they have the best players in the world.


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:06pm

 i dont think there the best in the world they've lost 2 of there past 3 games i think pakistan and probably india  can match or beat australia



-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:10pm
Well. its possible that Pakistan and India could beat Australia if they're playing at home.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:15pm

pakistan have improved right i reckon they can kick australias ass at home or anywhere i hope they play soon 3 one dayers coming up in june between them inzy,yosuf,butt,akmal,khan,malik have all improved since there last tour of australia



-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:25pm
Really...

Pakistan are facing Australia??

When?

It'll be the perfect chance for Inzamam to make an impact. YES!

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:29pm
June i think this year after or before the bangladesh test cant wait to see pakistan give them aussies a hammering akhtar is going to go head to head with his mate lee and once and for all whey'll see who is the fastest of them all

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:40pm
That's going to be a crazy competition. Lee vs. Shoaib. Inzamam vs. Ponting.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:47pm

akmal v gilchrist,y.khan v martyn,butt v jaques/katich,yousuf v symonds,razzaq v hussey and afridi v all of them afridi beats them all



-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:53pm
Yea, that'll be one heck of a competition.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:57pm
australia dont stand a chance against the mighty pakistani's arshad khan will be the spin doctor for pakistan with kaneria in support

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: vize
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 5:59pm
Yeah this is a very good Pakistan team. Pakistans batting has been so good of late I think they will easily be able to score over 500 against Australia. Their bowlers might struggle but there again, Australia's batsmen (except for Ponting) are not in the best of form

-------------


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 6:00pm
these are odis by the way 3 of them

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 22 January 2006 at 11:11pm
I don't think you can count out the Aussies so easily. As good as Pakistan might be at the moment, they won't just crush Australia. It'll be a hard competition, and hopefully at the end, Pakistan will be the team on top.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: Charlie
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 3:42am
look at there bowling and battin attack. they have shane warne and glenn mcgrath and the supreme pace of brett lee. also the new sing bowler nathan bracken. and their batting line up with hayden and langer opening both made many hundred and hayden making the sceond highest score in an innings. ponting a great captain and has made over 8000 runs and hussey and hodge both new to game but have proved that they deserve the place. hussey making hundreds and hodge making double huindred. also with symonds good with the ball and bat and a great fielder with a superior shot at the stumps. and they also back each other up..

thats why they are the best!


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 3:57am
Exactly! The Australians are still the best.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: *Wiljoy
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 10:57am
Originally posted by saadadvanced7

So, what's your point. We know the Aussies are the best, but I can tell you that they won't be the best in about 5 years time.



People were saying exactly that 20 years ago,and they will still be spouting it in another 20 years.

We have youngsters comming up just the same as all the other minnow countries.

-------------
Must get a drink,I'm drier than a pommies bath towel.
Australians all let us rejoice,for we are 1-2-3.





Posted By: Clapo
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 1:29pm
i don't think any1 knows who will be the best in 5 years time, that will depend on which team finds the right mix of youth, experience, batting & bowling, it seems pointless trying to predict whot it will be now


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 3:24pm
i think the west indies will be the best team in the next 10 years

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: prayas
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 11:19pm

Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE

i think the west indies will be the best team in the next 10 years

no way i cant imagine coz i dont see any shining star in west indies



-------------
eat cricket,sleep cricket, dream cricket,play cricket,.,,,,,,,,,,,


Posted By: prayas
Date Posted: 25 January 2006 at 11:21pm
if anyone wants to be better than australai then they have to have better team spirit then the austalains. today it is due to their spirit theya re no 1 in the world today.

-------------
eat cricket,sleep cricket, dream cricket,play cricket,.,,,,,,,,,,,


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 26 January 2006 at 11:30am
i dont think they have the most team spirit

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 26 January 2006 at 9:21pm
I think they have good team spirit. Because after loosing the Ashes, they still came back and dominated the world. That's team spirit.

They also have the best players in the world. They have the best bowlers (McGrath and Warne). They have the best Test batsman today, Ricky Ponting. And they have a lot of other class players.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: dips_december
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 5:14am
simple while batting their top 4 batsman hardly fail and while fielding they have top bowlers backed up by superb fielders like symonds ,ponting ,hussey ,clarke etc..


Posted By: RightHandBat
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 5:25am
Originally posted by ANIL KUMBLE

australia don't stand a chance against the mighty pakistani's arshad khan will be the spin doctor for pakistan with kaneria in support



You are an idiot. Australia are the best team in the world, and you cannot deny that. Half of the Australian team would make up a World XI. Australia have world class players, the best players in the world.


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 6:13am
Aussie will continue there great team in the next 5 years they have some very good players coming through.


Posted By: crownmethod
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 6:40am
Once Glenn McGrath and Warne retire, Australia will not be No.1 any more. So get ready, 1st spot is up for grabs! In 6 years time I would say South Africa would be no.1 in ODI. In Tests it would be so tight, so I don't really know.

-------------


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 7:58am
yous don't understand that theres many people in australian state that could be playing now and some are just as good as them except there is none any better than punter. Fast bowlers we are introuble there and maybe australia could develop dan cullen who is way ahead in development at the same stage of warneys career but batting wise theres alot to look foward to. We could become an india cant bowl but we can bat


Posted By: crownmethod
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 8:00am
The people that play for australian states aren't as good as the other young guys in the other countries.

-------------


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 8:03am

ahhh yer thats because there like 24-28 and havent had international experience, There will always be a good australian team. They are just as good they just need experience.



Posted By: Clapo
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 8:08am

Originally posted by crownmethod

The people that play for australian states aren't as good as the other young guys in the other countries.

What makes you say that ?



Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 10:26am
I wouldn't agree with crownmethod - you have to be a damn good player to play state cricket down under. In fact you can be sure there are guys playing grade cricket that are better than some of the players here in the English county championship.


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 01 April 2006 at 11:33am
clobber  theres guys that come over from county and play grade cricket and not many are successful. But yer it is true what your saying one of your blokes his name is jake ? (something) and he plays junior 19s for england and county (not the top level), but when he comes to australia he only gets a game in second grade and averages around 30. Were i cant remember his exact name but he played for bayswater/morley is western australia and he played county and apparen'tly has been doing ok for himself


Posted By: eddyc_solid
Date Posted: 04 April 2006 at 3:20pm

australian team in 5 years

phil jacques,ponting,cosgrove,clarke,symonds,haddin,lee,warne(he can play till 40 + if he wants)clark,tait,?

 

 



-------------
The robbed that smiles steals something from the thief.


Posted By: eddyc_solid
Date Posted: 04 April 2006 at 3:21pm

hussey

 



-------------
The robbed that smiles steals something from the thief.


Posted By: Sledger
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 7:14am
Originally posted by eddyc_solid

australian team in 5 years


phil jacques,ponting,cosgrove,clarke,symonds,haddin,lee,warne(he can play till 40 + if he wants)clark,tait,?



Hmmmmm , Ponting won't open. Symonds will disappear. Warne's shoulder will give out well before he's 40. Stuart Clark will be 35......Brett Lee will be 33 and knackered and Tait will still be spraying it all over the park.

It looks like Australia won't be able to bowl Zimbabwe out after Warne and McGrath give it up!

-------------
Mental disintegration works for me !!


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 7:22am

that team looks old i think dan cullen,cameron white,chris hartley,adam croswaite or paine for keeper ,mark cosgrove,andre o'brien,callum ferguson should be in that team hussey will prpbably still be in the team at 35



-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 9:53am
that team will still beat england. clark will have more experience (he doesnt try bowl fast) tait will be experienced and will produce wicket taking deleveries, if warney isn't around cullen could do well,
Brett lee will do well at 33 with experience maybe not as much pace but will be more accurate and symonds probaly wont be around in the test team as much as i hate to say this but his test match figures are pathetic average of 19, although they can atleast look decent after bangladesh (hopefully)
But i think he could do well against england as he likes playing them as much as his figures don't show it.


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 9:57am
what was wrong with symonds tour of south africa i think he did better then most of the other aussie batsmen took wickets made runs thats what you want from an all rounder isint it 30-40 odd runs and 2-3 wickets i think he played a good series its just the age concern hes already 30 and will be 35 in the next 5 years so i doubt hes name would still appear in the aussie squad 5 years from now

-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 10:01am
yer it wasnt too bad, the pitches were hard to play on for all batsmen


Posted By: Sledger
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 10:11am
Originally posted by RISE_OF_MACCA

yer it wasnt too bad, the pitches were hard to play on for all batsmen


How does this stand with your comment ( on another thread) that SA produces the best pitches after the Australians??

Highly contradictory in my view.....

-------------
Mental disintegration works for me !!


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 10:13am
How about relook there i didn't say they make best pitches at present and you agreed in the post before by saying so they should because of the sun coming from a whinging pom there


Posted By: Sledger
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 11:15am
Originally posted by RISE_OF_MACCA

How about relook there i didn't say they make best pitches at present and you agreed in the post before by saying so they should because of the sun coming from a whinging pom there


Anyone explain this ???? 1st prize is a double Mac and coke with R_O_M

-------------
Mental disintegration works for me !!


Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 11:17am



-------------
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 11:19am

sledger ok just for you england make crap pitches south africa and australia make the best pitches but maybe not right at present times maybe to some bad weather during preparation or something.

I know gillespie and kaspa got smacked around at england, due to some good batting and poor bowling and i hate them anyways



Posted By: RightHandBat
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 11:28am
Originally posted by RISE_OF_MACCA

sledger ok just for you england make crap pitches south africa and australia make the best pitches but maybe not right at present times maybe to some bad weather during preparation or something.

I know gillespie and kaspa got smacked around at england, due to some good batting and poor bowling and i hate them anyways



That's coming from someone who couldn't match half their career averages. I'm sure you would get smashed around aswell, by international batsman.


Posted By: RISE_OF_MACCA
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 11:30am
yer your right it is, but for international level that was poor bowling and strauss and company put away the bad balls. Id rather have other bowlers in the team that can actually bowl.


Posted By: eddyc_solid
Date Posted: 05 April 2006 at 1:49pm
sledger you seem to think you know about everything and your predictions are very arrogant most cricketers play till 35 mate

-------------
The robbed that smiles steals something from the thief.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz - http://www.webwiz.co.uk