Print Page | Close Window

Dhoni or Pathan

Printed From: Cricket World
Category: Letter To The Editor
Forum Name: Cricket World Ratings
Forum Discription: Who is the Most Valuable Player?
URL: http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716
Printed Date: 23 May 2013 at 11:57pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Dhoni or Pathan
Posted By: DRAVID FAN
Subject: Dhoni or Pathan
Date Posted: 08 January 2006 at 6:07pm
i would say Pathan because Dhoni is not gud at playing under pressure.if india r in trouble then he fails. Pathan plays well in both positions.



Replies:
Posted By: -JP-
Date Posted: 08 January 2006 at 7:11pm
Seems a bit of a strange question to me - they play completely different roles so why would you ever need to make a choice between them?


Posted By: capital_s
Date Posted: 08 January 2006 at 8:03pm
Some of these polls are overboard... dhoni and pathan are totally
different players, pathan being an allrounder, dhoni being a specialist
batsmen.

-------------
My two favourite Batsmen:
Jacques Kallis is a very solid but destructive batsmen and not to mention he can bowl as well.
I also like Michael Clarke for his amazing batting talent at such a young age


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 09 January 2006 at 2:06am
Actually a keeper-batsman is also an all-rounder...and I'm not just making it up, I read it in a book...reading is awesome...that's how I learn about some of the cricket greats.

Really, its useless comparing the 2. Pathan is a bowler-batsman all-rounder, while Dhoni is a keeper-batsman all-rounder.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: MiNiWaRnEy
Date Posted: 09 January 2006 at 2:39am

It just depends wqho offers more to the team. Dhoni is a better batmen, while Dhoni doesnt bowl, Pathan does. Dhoni keeps wiket, Pathan doesn't.

I would say equal, but remember when Rahul was keeping wicket, he offered more then Dhoni.

Anyway...Dhoni could be up there one day with Adam Gilchrist and Andy Flower as teh finest Batsmen-Keepers in history.



-------------


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 09 January 2006 at 10:03am
Yea, if Dhoni continues in his current form, he will no doubt be up there with Gilchrist as one of the finest keeper-batsman ever.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: krisdy
Date Posted: 09 January 2006 at 10:46am

Originally posted by saadadvanced7

Yea, if Dhoni continues in his current form, he will no doubt be up there with Gilchrist as one of the finest keeper-batsman ever.

I pray your words come true saad



-------------
"I go by present and present says - Sachin IS the BEST , Shewag is going to be the next best and Dhoni's is gonna rock the world with his brutal assaults - GOD help the rest of the world"


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 09 January 2006 at 10:49am
Well, I sure don't because if Dhoni becomes a Gilchrist, he will be a real pain for us (Pakistan).

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: krisdy
Date Posted: 09 January 2006 at 10:55am

India wants Dhoni and patan to keep up the good work [shown by them for a short period] ,, coz they give lot of options and confidence to the top



-------------
"I go by present and present says - Sachin IS the BEST , Shewag is going to be the next best and Dhoni's is gonna rock the world with his brutal assaults - GOD help the rest of the world"


Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 10 January 2006 at 7:38pm
Ofcourse. Pathan is an all-rounder now and so is Dhoni. Dhoni and Pathan have both improved their battnig a lot and it makes India's batting attack look really dangerous.

-------------
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.


Posted By: $uNnY
Date Posted: 28 March 2006 at 12:43am
Irfan Pathan


Posted By: SEHWAG NO.1
Date Posted: 28 March 2006 at 12:45am
well its hard to say but ill go with dhoni as he is a matchwinner for india


Posted By: Jyothika
Date Posted: 28 March 2006 at 6:13pm
Originally posted by capital_s

Some of these polls are overboard... dhoni and pathan are totally
different players, pathan being an allrounder, dhoni being a specialist
batsmen.


Yeh, i agree.


Posted By: dhoniisbest
Date Posted: 13 May 2006 at 4:30am
Both are really really good batsmens in the team. The only difference is that one is good wicket keeper and other one is bowler.


Posted By: crownmethod
Date Posted: 13 May 2006 at 8:38am
Both are great batsman, but I would say Dhoni is better that Pathan with the bat. With the gloves, it is obviously Dhoni, and with the ball, it is obviously Pathan. You can't really compare these two.

-------------


Posted By: darlo_lad
Date Posted: 13 May 2006 at 9:50am
In what way do I need to vote, seeing as Dhoni is a keeper batsman but Pathan is an all rounder? Is this topic not just another way of starting new threads?


Posted By: razzaq_fan
Date Posted: 13 May 2006 at 5:36pm
Originally posted by dhoniisbest

Both are really really good batsmens in the team. The only difference is that one is good wicket keeper and other one is bowler.



Dhoni is not a good keeper

-------------
razzaq is the next imran khan


Posted By: dhoniisbest
Date Posted: 13 May 2006 at 7:26pm
He will be in next few years. He is not best world but he is in Indian team.


Posted By: wccc
Date Posted: 13 May 2006 at 9:57pm
Pathans great, not sure bout dhoni yet

-------------
Blink 182 rule
Travis
Mark
Tom


Posted By: henjam
Date Posted: 13 May 2006 at 11:03pm
waste of space this thread, duno how you can compare the two. why does everyone keep coming up with these annoying threads who is better? or x v y?


Posted By: wccc
Date Posted: 13 May 2006 at 11:08pm
we do it to find out peoples opinions.

-------------
Blink 182 rule
Travis
Mark
Tom


Posted By: dhoniisbest
Date Posted: 14 May 2006 at 7:11pm
henjam, you should know that. What else are you going to talk about.


Posted By: crownmethod
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 9:21am

Originally posted by razzaq_fan

Originally posted by dhoniisbest

Both are really really good batsmens in the team. The only difference is that one is good wicket keeper and other one is bowler.



Dhoni is not a good keeper

That gives me a good idea, maybe I could make a thread, called 'Geriant Jones v Mahendra Dhoni'.



-------------


Posted By: jumbo
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 9:49am

whats the diff. between these two threads

http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&PN=1 - http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=716&am p;PN=1

http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=444&PN=1 - http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=444&am p;PN=1



-------------
sorry guys i don't have pc in my hostel so i can't use the net very often.


Posted By: Top Cat
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 3:58pm
Is there a difference???

-------------


Posted By: wccc
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 5:27pm
not really

-------------
Blink 182 rule
Travis
Mark
Tom


Posted By: jumbo
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 5:35pm
both r havin the same topic name as well as the topic starter. JP/Sledger will close one of them, anyways back to the topic

-------------
sorry guys i don't have pc in my hostel so i can't use the net very often.


Posted By: Top Cat
Date Posted: 15 May 2006 at 5:41pm
Their both started by DRAVID FAN.

-------------


Posted By: dhoniisbest
Date Posted: 17 May 2006 at 2:36am
Originally posted by jumbo

both r havin the same topic name as well as the topic starter. JP/Sledger will close one of them, anyways back to the topic

Thanks Jumbo, but I don't think some people are listening.


Posted By: jumbo
Date Posted: 20 May 2006 at 6:27am

Originally posted by DRAVID FAN

i would say Pathan because Dhoni is not gud at playing under pressure.if india r in trouble then he fails. Pathan plays well in both positions.

dhoni has played some very good knocks while chasing. he has also performed under pressure. his innings against s.l. were very good.(183 and the one he played with raina). also all the chasing in the recent times were under pressure(run rate above 6)



-------------
sorry guys i don't have pc in my hostel so i can't use the net very often.


Posted By: dips_december
Date Posted: 20 May 2006 at 10:02am
both are good in their own fields ,whats the use of comparing them????????????


-------------


Posted By: dhoniisbest
Date Posted: 20 May 2006 at 8:30pm
Yes, I agree with you dips_december.
Don't compare two people from same team.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz - http://www.webwiz.co.uk