player like sir bradman
Printed From: Cricket World
Category: Letter To The Editor
Forum Name: Cricket World Ratings
Forum Discription: Who is the Most Valuable Player?
URL: http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=778
Printed Date: 20 May 2013 at 8:29pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.71 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: player like sir bradman
Posted By: prayas
Subject: player like sir bradman
Date Posted: 15 January 2006 at 7:11pm
|
which youngster do u think have a abilityto be a player like sir bradman in near future ------------- eat cricket,sleep cricket, dream cricket,play cricket,.,,,,,,,,,,, |
Replies:
Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 15 January 2006 at 8:38pm
| How can someone "deserve" to be a player like Bradman? |
Posted By: cricketluva
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 12:56am
|
Exactely, the closest is probably Sachin, he is still no where near. ------------- See you later Gilly! Thanks for the memories! |
Posted By: -JP-
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 1:19am
|
We probably shouldn't allow topics like these - Bradman is a one-off, no-one will get near to his average and it's almost wrong to suggest anyone might or is anywhere near his equal. ------------- |
Posted By: cricketluva
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 1:40am
|
Certainly, he played 54 tests at an average of approximately 100 and played a few hundred tests with an average of 95, pure brilliance and a one off no one will better him for a long time if ever. ------------- See you later Gilly! Thanks for the memories! |
Posted By: -JP-
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 1:53am
|
52 Tests, 80 innings, 29 centuries, 6996 runs, 99.94 average 234 First Class games, 338 innings, 117 centuries, 28067 runs, 95.14 average No-one will better that. ------------- |
Posted By: cricketluva
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 2:09am
|
certainly, remember alos he played on uncovered wickets, so basically multiply his average by 1 and a half and that is equivalent to what it is worth on conditions these days. ------------- See you later Gilly! Thanks for the memories! |
Posted By: Sledger
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 6:06am
Right again JP ! Can I suggest free lobotomies for some of the members mate? Of course , we might not be able to tell if the operation was successful! ------------- Mental disintegration works for me !! |
Posted By: Big Josh
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 6:14am
NO one in my opinion ------------- josh |
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 7:40pm
| Hussey is close to Bradman...but its just the beginning and I know that there is no way that at the end of his career he will have an average higher than 99.94. |
Posted By: prayas
Date Posted: 16 January 2006 at 10:08pm
|
i know that no one can be compared to sir bradman but i simply wanted your thoughts regarding the best youngster in modern day cricket these days thats it nothing more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ------------- eat cricket,sleep cricket, dream cricket,play cricket,.,,,,,,,,,,, |
Posted By: Charlie
Date Posted: 17 January 2006 at 5:00am
if damien martyn didnt have 10 years out he might of got around that average......... the question is the 'abiliy to play like' not deserve |
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 17 January 2006 at 5:27am
| I highly doubt that Martyn would've gotten an average even close to Bradman's. I don't think anyone will ever get an average near bradmans. |
Posted By: prayas
Date Posted: 17 January 2006 at 9:51pm
|
i also dont think martyn would have neared the record of bradman coz bradman is great and today i think no cricketer have the ability to match his skills not even sachin, inzy and youngster micheal hussey ------------- eat cricket,sleep cricket, dream cricket,play cricket,.,,,,,,,,,,, |
Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 17 January 2006 at 10:05pm
|
theres a time when a legends are replaced you cant go on forvever saying bradmans the greates cricketer ever if brett lee bowled his super quick delivery to bradman i think bradman would struggle bowlers back then bowled a lot different to the bowlers now ------------- Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though... |
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 17 January 2006 at 10:40pm
| Yea, that's true. Bradman didn't face the quality bowling that later developed after his time. |
Posted By: cricketluva
Date Posted: 18 January 2006 at 1:16am
That is true somewhat, many bowlers in taht time used to barely be medium pace and bowled from 5 strides, but there were a few that were super quick Truemen, the bodyline bowlers, and tha Aussie aboriginal who they say is the fastest ever bowler. Sorry can not remember his name. ------------- See you later Gilly! Thanks for the memories! |
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 18 January 2006 at 2:15am
| Still, there weren't as many class bowlers back then compared to now. |
Posted By: Black_cap_95
Date Posted: 18 January 2006 at 8:42am
|
Bradman is just to good on a flight of stairs of how good the batsmen is it would be sachin second to top then 100 stairs up its bradman to good for anyone else. ------------- go hard or go home |
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 18 January 2006 at 7:09pm
| Yea, Bradman is still the best. I think he would average around 70 today. |
Posted By: prayas
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 2:03am
|
if he was playing today than he might have developed more ability to play fast blowers like lee,akhtar. so he is always going to be best ------------- eat cricket,sleep cricket, dream cricket,play cricket,.,,,,,,,,,,, |
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 2:06am
| Yea, no doubt about that. Bradman will always be the best batsman. |
Posted By: Sledger
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 6:11am
Rubbish!! Harold Larwood was seriously quick and hit practically every Aussie batsmen on the 1932 Bodyline Tour! Voce was quick too! Pitches weren't anywhere near the standard of today and they remained uncovered in all weathers. It's silly to compare cricketers of different eras , but don't patronise the quicks of yesteryear - they were nasty fellows , just like todays guys! Fact is , with the nice pitches and all that armour I'd say today's batsmen are bloody soft - in the old days it was a cap , thin gloves , a brittle box and a ton of courage. ------------- Mental disintegration works for me !! |
Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 9:47am
| Not to mention that the bats themselves were nothing like the powerhouse things we see today |
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 11:55am
| I don't get it. Why does it matter if the pitch is covered or uncovered. |
Posted By: Clobber
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 12:21pm
| Have you ever tried batting on a damp pitch? |
Posted By: ANIL KUMBLE
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 3:37pm
|
if bradman was playing in this time of cricket i think hes average would be 30 i take nothing away from his an amazing batsmen back in his time if you have to say whos the best ever batsmen probably a recent batsmen like allan border,sunil,gavaskar,brian lara,sachin tendaulker i dont know what was so great about steve waugh ------------- Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though... |
Posted By: robdawg
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 3:53pm
| boys bradman is in a league of his own maybe in the next 1000 years there will b another but what u got to remeber is back then he played to the best ability of his era so if he played now hed still dominate or find a way too |
Posted By: saadadvanced7
Date Posted: 19 January 2006 at 8:51pm
|
Yea, that's true. Bradman is the best batsman of all times.
I don't think there'll be a batsman like him even in a million years. |
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 01 March 2006 at 10:52am
|
i seriously can't think of any body daaaaaaa!!!!!!!! how about naaaaaaahhhh |
Posted By: DRAVID FAN
Date Posted: 02 March 2006 at 10:48pm
|
There might be a player. You never know. He might come soon, but till then
No one can ever equal Donald Bradman. ------------- |
Posted By: exotic
Date Posted: 10 March 2006 at 3:18am
| If anyone can then certainly its Dhoni, The Mahender Singh Dhoni. |
Posted By: MiNiWaRnEy
Date Posted: 10 March 2006 at 4:36am
|
You are obsessed, Dhoni could be a failure, Bradman never was. ------------- |
Posted By: Sledger
Date Posted: 10 March 2006 at 6:17am
|
I don't believe some of these threads. If you can't think of something sensible to post , then please do nothing and just read the other postings.
Bradman was a freak of nature who played cricket at a level that no-one has come anywhere close to matching. Anyone who knows cricket and has researched Bradman's career (and watched footage of his feats) will never compare him to any other batsman , alive or dead. ------------- Mental disintegration works for me !! |