|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 111> |
| Author | ||
Wolfman
Test Debutant
Joined: 09 October 2005 Posts: 100 |
Topic: Stump The GuruPosted: 26 October 2005 at 4:30pm |
|
|
Is it possible to not concede any runs, but at the same time not bowl any maidens?
|
||
![]() |
||
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 6232 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 4:33pm |
|
|
Yes, by not bowling any overs.
Couldn't resist that one, sorry!
|
||
![]() |
||
Wolfman
Test Debutant
Joined: 09 October 2005 Posts: 100 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 4:34pm |
|
|
yeah, not the answer I was looking for. Perhaps my phrasing of the question is a little ambigious!
|
||
![]() |
||
swerveman
Short Leg
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 397 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 4:35pm |
|
|
It depends on your definition of "Runs". You can bowl wides and no-balls but not concede any runs off the bat.
|
||
![]() |
||
Wolfman
Test Debutant
Joined: 09 October 2005 Posts: 100 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 4:43pm |
|
|
yep, but wides are attributed against the bowler.
Can a bowler have figures like 10 overs 0 maidens 0 runs 2 wickets? |
||
![]() |
||
swerveman
Short Leg
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 397 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 4:50pm |
|
|
I look forward to finding out! I'm going home.
|
||
![]() |
||
Kruppel
12th Man
Joined: 26 October 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 8 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 5:34pm |
|
|
Maiden - An over where no runs that are attributable to the bowler are scored (byes or leg-byes may be scored in this over, though, as these don't count against the bowler) Maiden over : an over in which no runs are scored, and no wides or no balls are bowled. It is therefore impossible to not concede any runs, and at the same time not bowl any maidens. |
||
|
Kruppel
|
||
![]() |
||
Wolfman
Test Debutant
Joined: 09 October 2005 Posts: 100 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 5:38pm |
|
|
Good going Kruppel. Byes and Leg Byes may be conceded in an over, but
it is only no-balls, runs off the bat, or wides which go against the
bowler.
It is perceivably possible that after 10 overs, there could have been ten maidens, but the score could be on 50, all from byes or leg-byes. |
||
![]() |
||
Wolfman
Test Debutant
Joined: 09 October 2005 Posts: 100 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 5:39pm |
|
|
Your turn to post a question
|
||
![]() |
||
Kruppel
12th Man
Joined: 26 October 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 8 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 5:48pm |
|
|
i remembering watching the super series, and during one of the one day games,i am not sure who the player was, a run out occured. The question was weather the bails had to lift clear from the wickets. What is the rule?When does a run out occur?when the bail completely lifts from the wickets,or when the bails fall on the ground?Or is it when the bail is lifted marginally? |
||
|
Kruppel
|
||
![]() |
||
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 7:23pm |
|
is there any reason for why this was specifically regarded to me (not that i mind or anything, just curious). |
||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
||
![]() |
||
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 7:24pm |
|
|
the answer to the question is when the bail is lifted marginally.
|
||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
||
![]() |
||
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 6232 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 10:09pm |
|
|
Because originally One Hammer posted it as a response to one of your posts. I moved it, creating a new topic but was unable to edit out what he'd written. Hope that clears things up. |
||
![]() |
||
swerveman
Short Leg
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 397 |
Posted: 26 October 2005 at 11:47pm |
|
|
So the answer to this question is "No".
Edited by swerveman |
||
![]() |
||
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 12:13am |
|
well, thanks JP. PS. nobody told me if my answer is correct to the question regarding the run out.
|
||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
||
![]() |
||
One Hammer
Short Leg
Joined: 15 October 2005 Posts: 196 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 3:00am |
|
|
Thanks for clearing that up JP.
The thread was left without a question.... Can we make a ruling if someone comes on and there is no Question asked they can leave a question? Just so the thread dosnt die to quickly. May i now enforce that ruling please? Please can you help to solve an ongoing dispute at my cricket club. Obviously the laws state that a batsman should not be given out lbw if the ball pitches outside the line of leg stump. However, if the batsman is hit on the full toss outside the line of leg stump, and the ball would have gone on to hit the stumps, should he be given out? |
||
|
Remember when you point the finger at someone,you have 3 pointing back at you !!!
|
||
![]() |
||
swerveman
Short Leg
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 397 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 9:00am |
|
|
No, he shouldn't be given out. The ball has still pitched outside the line of leg stump, even though it's pitched on his foot.
|
||
![]() |
||
-JP-
Manager
Joined: 21 January 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 6232 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 9:26am |
|
|
We haven't actually confirmed or otherwise the response to Kruppel's question: i remembering watching the super series, and during one of the one day games,i am not sure who the player was, a run out occured. The question was weather the bails had to lift clear from the wickets. What is the rule?When does a run out occur?when the bail completely lifts from the wickets,or when the bails fall on the ground?Or is it when the bail is lifted marginally?
|
||
![]() |
||
swerveman
Short Leg
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 397 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 9:28am |
|
Law 28 (The wicket is down)1. Wicket put down (b) The disturbance of a bail, whether temporary or not, shall not constitute its complete removal from the top of the stumps, but if a bail in falling lodges between two of the stumps this shall be regarded as complete removal.
|
||
![]() |
||
Sledger
Captain
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law ! Joined: 08 August 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 15694 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 10:19am |
|
Hammer pm'd me the answer swerve - and you're spot on as usual !!
The ball must be bowled wicket to wicket or outside off to get an LBW - it doesn't matter if it pitches or not , if it's outside leg , it's outside leg! Your turn to set one Guru !
|
||
|
Mental disintegration works for me !!
|
||
![]() |
||
swerveman
Short Leg
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 397 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 11:15am |
|
|
OK, I don't have much time, so here's a simple one:
The Law now states that the toss must take place between certain times. (a) What are these times?
|
||
![]() |
||
saadadvanced7
Banned
4000 Test Runs Joined: 04 August 2005 Location: Canada Posts: 3938 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 1:36pm |
|
|
the toss is suppose to take place on the pitch.the time is right before the match
.
I hope i'm right
|
||
|
Regulation without integration leads to suicide.
|
||
![]() |
||
Kruppel
12th Man
Joined: 26 October 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 8 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 1:51pm |
|
|
The captains shall toss for the choice of innings on the field of play
not earlier than 30 minutes,nor later than 15 minutes befor the
scheduled or any rescheduled time for the start of play - Law 12 (innings)
Edited by Kruppel |
||
|
Kruppel
|
||
![]() |
||
Kruppel
12th Man
Joined: 26 October 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 8 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 2:02pm |
|
|
Due to the fact that the ICC is trying to stop time-wasting in
matches,they have imposed a law that the match referee may ban the
captain for slow overrates.
How is it determined that the over rate of the team is slow(how is it calculated),and what is the maximum suspenion that can be imposed on a captain?And do the match referee take into account circumstances like the batting team wasting time,and is the captain allowed to appeal the suspension? |
||
|
Kruppel
|
||
![]() |
||
swerveman
Short Leg
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 397 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 2:20pm |
|
|
Well, Kruppel got it right. The law states that the toss shall take place on the field of play. The captains still seem to like doing it on the pitch.
|
||
![]() |
||
Sledger
Captain
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law ! Joined: 08 August 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 15694 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 2:21pm |
|
|
Kruppel , are you an accountant , cos that just has to be THE most boring question I've ever se..............zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzz
|
||
|
Mental disintegration works for me !!
|
||
![]() |
||
Wolfman
Test Debutant
Joined: 09 October 2005 Posts: 100 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 3:59pm |
|
|
Kruppel, you sound like a lawyer!
|
||
![]() |
||
Kruppel
12th Man
Joined: 26 October 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 8 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 9:46pm |
|
|
Sledger,why do you think u can question other people's intellectual
capability's? I was merely trying to enlighten the mental aspect of
your life.Can u tell me the answer to my question not by asking me
another question?
|
||
|
Kruppel
|
||
![]() |
||
swerveman
Short Leg
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 397 |
Posted: 27 October 2005 at 11:16pm |
|
|
The answers are all contained in this document: http://www.icc-cricket.com/icc/rules/code-of-conduct-for-pla yers-and-officials.pdf The calculation is too lengthy to post here; it's in Section J of the document. The maximum ban is one Test Match or two ODIs. The match referee can take time wasting by the batting side into account, and the captain has a right to appeal. Sorry, chaps. I quite like the legal stuff!
|
||
![]() |
||
Sledger
Captain
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law ! Joined: 08 August 2005 Location: South Africa Posts: 15694 |
Posted: 28 October 2005 at 7:22am |
|
I didn't question your intellectual capability at all Kruppel , you are a sensitive soul aren't you. Don't try and enlighten the mental aspect of MY life , I do that in more ways than you could possibly know and NONE of them involve researching the dazzling world of your subject matter. Lastly , no , I won't answer your inane question , as I'm far too busy splitting the atom and developing the perfect cup of tea. |
||
|
Mental disintegration works for me !!
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 111> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |