Symonds Vs Flintoff |
Post Reply
|
Page 123 5> |
| Author | |
Boony06
Short Leg
Joined: 14 March 2006 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 208 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Symonds Vs FlintoffPosted: 23 March 2006 at 10:36am |
|
Alright this is to settle this discussion once and for all, i say Symonds very slightly as wickets are not that important in a One-Day International, its about economy. Symonds is the better batsman, and wateva Symonds loses to Flintoff in the bowling department he makes up for it in the field.
|
|
|
In memory of Malcolm Denzil Marshall 1958-1999 The greatest fast bowler in Test Cricket history.
|
|
![]() |
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 10:45am |
|
od say in odis symonds tests flintoff overall flintoooff for sure
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
![]() |
|
cricket_mstr
First Slip
Cricketer of the Week Joined: 09 December 2005 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 863 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 11:01am |
|
Symonds: Pro's The best super hitter in cricket, handy bowling in both forms, excellent fielding Con's Bad defensive game, no sign of good test batting Flintoff: Pro's Handy batting, should rank up their in the Top 3 bowlers in the world Con's Fielding no where as good as Symonds, Not as good hair do as Symonds Edited by cricket_mstr |
|
|
Cricket watcher but tennis player :)
|
|
![]() |
|
Clobber
Captain
Joined: 03 January 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 8838 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 11:05am |
|
|
![]() |
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 11:13am |
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
![]() |
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 11:16am |
|
flintooof good fielder good batsmen very good bowler
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
![]() |
|
Clobber
Captain
Joined: 03 January 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 8838 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 11:19am |
|
Flintoff is an exceptional fielder - one of the best slip catchers in
the game and an extremely powerful arm when fielding in the deep
|
|
![]() |
|
jumbo
Short Leg
Joined: 12 March 2006 Location: India Online Status: Offline Posts: 903 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 12:09pm |
|
recent form it has to be flintoff.the way he batted and bowled against the indians i think he is the best. there is no match for him at the present. he was cool in his approach. the way he bowled the bouncers, he has exceeded my expectations. |
|
![]() |
|
Sledger
Captain
Dickenson can marry my mother-in-law ! Joined: 08 August 2005 Location: South Africa Online Status: Offline Posts: 15694 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 1:26pm |
Succinctly put Jumbo. Just ask yourself a simple question , who do you want bowling 10 overs and batting when it matters? Easy answering that , isn't it? |
|
|
Mental disintegration works for me !!
|
|
![]() |
|
flipper
Square Leg
Joined: 27 August 2005 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 488 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 3:50pm |
|
I think Andrew Symonds is an awesome player and I have to add, one of my favourite players. I'm sorry but you can't put him in the same league as 'freddie'. You think that 'pig mullet' looks great? you can't be serious?
|
|
|
Warwickshire County Cricket, Edgbaston Birmingham England. County Champions 2012
|
|
![]() |
|
jumbo
Short Leg
Joined: 12 March 2006 Location: India Online Status: Offline Posts: 903 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 4:13pm |
|
freddie was awesome in the tests. it looked as if he wasn't putting any efforts. he bowled as if he was bowling to me the indian batsmen were completely fooled by his bouncers |
|
![]() |
|
warnester
First Slip
The boy who can bowl off-spin both ways Joined: 20 January 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 861 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 4:27pm |
|
freddie no doubt about it. he is too impressive and consistent with the ball and bat where symonds is wild and is inconsisent with his scores.
|
|
![]() |
|
minimurali
Wicket-Keeper
Like Murali, only smaller...and rubbish Joined: 05 February 2006 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1723 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 4:38pm |
|
I hate to admit it but I'm going with Symonds. In ODIs he is exceptional and although Freddie wins hands down on tests, its Symmo for me in ODIs I'm afraid.
|
|
|
County Sim on extended break until I've got less work and more free time. When I have a specific date, I'll post it in the thread.
|
|
![]() |
|
crick
Square Leg
Joined: 06 February 2006 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 398 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 5:17pm |
|
i think symonds, mainly becuase flintoff has had a few years at test level to get the feel of it, whereas symonds hasnt quite got there yet, but with regard to odi's symmonds is definately the better of the 2
|
|
![]() |
|
DRAVID FAN
Middle-Order Batsman
Joined: 27 November 2005 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 3635 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 9:23pm |
|
I would go for Freddy because I don't like Symonds, and Flintoof ahs been in the team for almost all the matches. Symonds is not taken for all matches. Plus he is a smoother player. More dangerous. More famous and popular.
|
|
![]() |
|
henjam
Square Leg
Joined: 23 January 2006 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 275 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 10:17pm |
|
Freddies bowling is much better in both forms, i would put freddy over symonds batting wise in both forms, symonds better fielder, but something that is huge is that what do these players bring to their teams! Symonds brings no way near what freddy does to england, he is the heartbeat of the england team.
|
|
![]() |
|
flipper
Square Leg
Joined: 27 August 2005 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 488 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 10:23pm |
|
Nice post, good points. |
|
|
Warwickshire County Cricket, Edgbaston Birmingham England. County Champions 2012
|
|
![]() |
|
daisy77
Opener
Lara Fan Joined: 05 December 2005 Location: Trinidad and Tobago Online Status: Offline Posts: 2488 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 March 2006 at 11:02pm |
|
I would definately go with Freddi. I can tell you one thing they both have in common though------ they were both born in England Symonds is a great player though but I just prefer Freddi compared to him...no offense. |
|
![]() |
|
crownmethod
Opener
Joined: 25 January 2006 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 2938 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 3:08am |
|
I think Freddie is better than Symonds because Freddie can play well in both ODI and Test. Symonds can only play well in ODI. And the only thing Symonds can do is slog. Freddie can protect his wicket, and slog. The only thing Symonds is better at is fielding.
|
|
![]() |
|
abubakar52
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 18 January 2006 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 1517 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 3:33am |
|
I think Flintoff is better.
|
|
![]() |
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 3:49am |
|
symmo in odis freddy in tests but if u had to pick flintoff for sure
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
![]() |
|
MiNiWaRnEy
Banned
Ricky Ponting for PM Joined: 14 December 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2395 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 4:49am |
Why?? You never elaborate AK...what is your reasoning to this..I am not disagreeing with you, but why do you think so and so is better in this and so and so is better then that.
Some details buddy ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
RightHandBat
Wicket-Keeper
The next best batsman Joined: 27 January 2006 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1399 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 5:03am |
Symonds doesn't slog. They're all proper cricket shots. |
|
![]() |
|
Boony06
Short Leg
Joined: 14 March 2006 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 208 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 5:06am |
No offense mate but i think both players are even in how dangerous they are, Symonds can turn a match with batting, fielding and on the odd occasion with bowling, and Flintoff with the bat and ball. You say that Flintoff is more popular, well there are not a lot of people in Australia who dislike Andy Symonds he is probobably the most liked cricketer in Australia, Flintoff the most liked in England, You cant compare. |
|
|
In memory of Malcolm Denzil Marshall 1958-1999 The greatest fast bowler in Test Cricket history.
|
|
![]() |
|
abubakar52
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 18 January 2006 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 1517 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 5:07am |
|
I think Freddie is a better all-rounder he ranks 2nd for best test all-rouners and he is also 2nd for Odi allrounders
|
|
![]() |
|
MiNiWaRnEy
Banned
Ricky Ponting for PM Joined: 14 December 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2395 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 5:21am |
|
Who's first?? Sobers is first in tests, what about ODI's?
|
|
![]() |
|
abubakar52
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 18 January 2006 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 1517 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 5:25am |
|
Im speaking of current best here is the list for current best all-rounder in ODI's i think its up to date
1 Shaun Pollock SA 2 Andrew Flintoff ENG 3 Andrew Symonds AUS 4 Irfan Pathan IND 5 Shoaib Malik PAK |
|
![]() |
|
MiNiWaRnEy
Banned
Ricky Ponting for PM Joined: 14 December 2005 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2395 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 5:29am |
|
Symonds is 3rd and those rankings do not indicate how excellent his fielding is, all the remarkable catches, run outs and saved runs.
Symonds is the most popular cricketer in Australia at the moment along with Hussey..do not say Freddy has a great deal more popularity..he has little here in Australia, but a lot in many other places.
|
|
![]() |
|
Boony06
Short Leg
Joined: 14 March 2006 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 208 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 5:32am |
|
Phil Tuffnell Is pretty popular in Australia
|
|
|
In memory of Malcolm Denzil Marshall 1958-1999 The greatest fast bowler in Test Cricket history.
|
|
![]() |
|
ANIL KUMBLE
Opening Bowler
7000 test wickets Joined: 16 December 2005 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 8043 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2006 at 5:32am |
|
abdul razzaq is a better all rounder then malik,hes a good all rounder but razzaq is one of the best in odis
|
|
|
Check out my blog http://crictopia.blogspot.com/ pretty bad though...
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 5> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |