Warne v MacGill

both these spinners are top class and i know you can say shane is the better spinner and i would just have to look at one of his 5 wicket hauls to see but i think stuart macgill could have been as good as warne if it werent for warne if you get what i mean. If stuart played for any other team he would have 500+ wickets easily but because and only because he plays for aus he has 200. Every time he plays along side warne he seems to get more wickets than him in a match what do you guys think about macgill

Warne way more succesful and the better bowler.

Warne is way more smarter in his bowling than MacGil, and I don't think MacGil is as liked amongst the team as Warney

 

http://www.cricketworld.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1397&a mp;PN=1

Originally posted by -JP- Originally posted by darlo_lad OK this has already been posted about please read forum before posting a new topic Strange as it may seem, we don't appear to have any open Warne v MacGill threads, so this one can stay it is. I'll change the thread title though.

Isn't there a  better leggie topic I know because I put about a 5 page long post in there

now now darling i was just trying to narrow it down to just these 2 if that is ok the other one involves all the leggies i am asking about how successfull macgill would have been if it werent for shane warne

darlo_las read wot i just said ffs, i am asking how successful macgill would have been if it werent for warne not who is the better leggie, just coz the title involves the same men doesnt mean it is the same thread

Warne by a street the reason why McGill got so many wickets was because of the Warne factor, the mystisim surrounding leg spinners McGill had 2 deliveries a leg break and a googly as where Warne had them all.