Forum Home Forum Home » Letter To The Editor » Cricket World Ratings
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
dips_december View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar
The next greatest left arm spinner

Joined: 31 March 2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5230
Post Options Post Options   Quote dips_december Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Stuart MacGill : The unluckiest
    Posted: 17 September 2006 at 6:38am

Amazingly, the leg-spinner's overall Test record begs the question as to why he continues to find himself more out of the Aussie team than in it. In 32 Tests, he's bagged 152 scalps with a strike rate of 55.5.

Incredibly, that puts him way ahead of other leading spin bowlers, including Muttiah Muralitharan (58) and Anil Kumble (65), thus adding to the irony of his exile from the Test arena.

His only sin, it seems, is that he is 'expensive', with wickets costing him 29.19 apiece. There's Shane Warne with 389 more scalps so he appears to have every right to be picked first. Yet his strike rate of a shade under 60 certainly puts a new turn on things.

Indeed, MacGill has often stepped up to the plate with Warne absent. The 1998/99 Ashes series saw the still relatively raw leg-spinner come back from being left out of Australia's second Test win in Perth to spearhead the Aussie attack with 27 wickets in the series, including a stunning 12-wicket haul in Sydney.

England, however, are not MacGill's forte.  The majority of his success has come against Brian Lara's men, with 48 wickets from 12 Tests against Brian Lara's men, nabbing the legendary lefty four times.

What about the fact that he's accounted for more than a quarter of his team's wickets when he has played and that Australia have lost just six of those matches to boot?

Shane Warne’s 12-month drugs ban last year left MacGill with a chance to finally strut his stuff on the Test stage. He responded with 53 wickets in 11 Tests for a total haul of 57 that made him the second highest wicket-taker for 2003. Unfortunately, that is where things, quite literally, spun to a halt.

Warne returned to tackle Sri Lanka and nobody, especially the Sri Lankan batsmen, could stop the rampant veteran who obliterated all and sundry with 26 scalps at 20 apiece in three Tests. In contrast, MacGill could only manage five at a more pedestrian average of 46.4.

Once could also question his absence from Australia's tour party in India. He may have just 14 wickets from four Tests against the same opposition, but Warne's record going into the recent series was 29 from just 12 Tests. Add in the nature of the wickets incurred during that series and who knows what might have been.(Source : cricket65)

He has always been my favourite leg spinner although Shane Warne has been the greatest .When he was asked that why dosent he laugh or enjoy when he takes a wicket ,he said : "Its tough to even smile ."

Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 11:51am
I hear (i wouldn't know) that MacGill causes Warne to perform worse with him in the side. Why this would be the case i don't know. But if it was true, i could understand why the selectors would do whatever they could to give Warne the attack around him that brings the best out of their prized asset.
Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
spin wizard View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
The world’s next great spinner

Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9453
Post Options Post Options   Quote spin wizard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 4:39pm

I am with you dips. Macgill is a fine leggy to me. He is just unlucky to be born in the same era as warne. His strike rate is real good. He can rip the ball a mile as well.... also possess the best "wrong un" or second best and its hard to pick too. When Warnie wasn't around, the lad bowled well. When warnie and him are around, he outbowls Warne so I can't see why him and warne can't play together. You see, the reason why he may out bowl shane when they are playing is because the batsmen knows that the only how they are gonna gets runs is against macgill cause in those times it was mcgrath and gillespie was no joke either.

I want to see more of macgill. Why couldn't he have been born in the windies.

In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
Back to Top
Wal Bada View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar

Joined: 09 July 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 711
Post Options Post Options   Quote Wal Bada Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 4:52pm
How's McGills record against better spin playing nations? LIke India and Sri Lanka. I think the real difference between an excpetionally good leggie and a legend gets exposed when they are bowling to IND, SL or PAK teams, simply any thing loose from a spinner will disappear to or over the boundry and some times even good ones do!

McGill is an exceptionally good leggie, but he will not make a legend as his bowling to subcontinent players is poor. (Remember how Sehwag took him apart)
Don't argue with fools. They'll drag you down to their level and then beat you with experiance
Back to Top
spin wizard View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
The world’s next great spinner

Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9453
Post Options Post Options   Quote spin wizard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 6:15pm
the sub continent lads took apart warnie too and sehwag just have a history of butchering any attack.
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 6:18pm
Anyone have his career stats?
Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
Wal Bada View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar

Joined: 09 July 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 711
Post Options Post Options   Quote Wal Bada Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 7:26pm
Stuart MacGill
Career M - 40, W - 198, Avg - 27.2, ER - 3.16, SR - 51.57
India M - 4, W - 14, Avg - 50.78, ER - 3.65, SR - 83.4
Pakistan M - 4, W - 23, Avg - 25.30, ER - 3.33, SR - 45.5
Sri Lanka M - 2, W - 5, Avg - 46.40, ER - 4.19, SR - 66.4


Shane Warne
Career M - 140, W - 685, Avg - 25.25, ER - 2.64, SR - 57.3
India M - 14, W - 43, Avg - 47.18, ER - 3.10, SR - 91.2
Pakistan M - 15, W -90, Avg - 20.17, ER - 2.68, SR - 45.0
Sri Lanka M - 13, W - 59, Avg- 25.54, ER - 2.85, SR - 53.6


Muralitharan
Career M - 108, W - 657, Avg - 21.96, ER - 2.39, SR - 55.0
India M - 15, W - 67, Avg - 32.47, ER - 2.73, SR - 71.2
Pakistan M - 14, W - 79, Avg - 23.31, ER - 2.58, SR - 54.1
Australia M - 11, W - 55, Avg - 31.41, ER - 3.03, SR - 62.1


This shows few important facts

  • Indians play spin well.

  • Pakistanis are notoriously weak against spin

  • Warne has better stats in sub-continent than MacGill

  • MacGill has become less effective because of his expensiveness

  • Murali has bowled better to Indians than lot of other spinners


This is the reason why I am not calling MacGill a legend like Warne

Edited by Wal Bada
Don't argue with fools. They'll drag you down to their level and then beat you with experiance
Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:15pm

Thanks wal.

I think Australia have missed a trick by not bedding Warne and Macgill into a spin partnership.

Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
inzamam329 View Drop Down
Banned
Banned


Joined: 07 January 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1204
Post Options Post Options   Quote inzamam329 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:20pm
Unlike Warne, Mcgill will always garauntee you a long hop or a full toss atleast once every over. He is not as consistent as warne in bolwing a tight line and lenth and not giving away freebies to take away the pressure. Bowling 4 or 5 excellent delviries and building the pressure for that over, then suddnly drop one short or a full toss, getting hit for a 4 or six ruins tha hard work for that over.
Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:32pm
I hear nothing but good things about Macgill. Is he overrated by Aussies than?
Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
70_degree_spin View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 05 August 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
Post Options Post Options   Quote 70_degree_spin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 8:48pm
He isn't as clever as Warne, he sort of reminds me of Sami because he tries to get so much spin on the ball like what Sami does with his pace.
However, he is a fantastic bowler and for any other nation would have bagged hundreds more wickets.
[

Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 September 2006 at 9:26pm
 like England?
Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
Wal Bada View Drop Down
Banned
Banned
Avatar

Joined: 09 July 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 711
Post Options Post Options   Quote Wal Bada Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 September 2006 at 3:20am
Originally posted by TCA123

 like England?


Don't argue with fools. They'll drag you down to their level and then beat you with experiance
Back to Top
dips_december View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar
The next greatest left arm spinner

Joined: 31 March 2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5230
Post Options Post Options   Quote dips_december Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 September 2006 at 5:06am
Originally posted by TCA123

I think Australia have missed a trick by not bedding Warne and Macgill into a spin partnership.

Thats what MacGill has always said that if he and warne play tigether it will reduce the pressure of Warne .

Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 September 2006 at 9:55pm
in theory i would tend to agree. Wouldnt Macgill improve as a player too with the very best to observe?
Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
DRAVID FAN View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3635
Post Options Post Options   Quote DRAVID FAN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 September 2006 at 9:59pm
The most unlucky cricketer in the history of cricket followed by Sir Don Bradman.

He is a great bowler and desrves more than what he got from the ACB. Unfortunate to be born in the era of Shane Waren. If he got the chance, you never know, he might have crossed the greatest leg spinner of all time.
Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 September 2006 at 5:54pm
I can't believe that Aussies have two good leggies and England find it hard to get a below average one.
Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
cheech View Drop Down
12th Man
12th Man
Avatar

Joined: 05 September 2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 66
Post Options Post Options   Quote cheech Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 September 2006 at 7:57am
well, going back to 2nd post, whenever both leggies (stuey and warney) have played, warney has been performing below average. Im not sure why.

Anyway coming to think of it, ive never seen warney bowl a bad ball, or a BIG wide. only wides he ever bowls was if it doesnt spin out of the rough into stupms from RHB's legstump. Stuey on the other hand... he doesnt bowl so hot in aussie state cricket.
"If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing!!!"
Back to Top
70_degree_spin View Drop Down
Opener
Opener
Avatar

Joined: 05 August 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
Post Options Post Options   Quote 70_degree_spin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 September 2006 at 5:25pm
Why was Don Bradman so unlucky, the famous googly was a jaffa. It wasn't luck or are you talking about something else?
[

Back to Top
mAni_paKi View Drop Down
Extra Cover
Extra Cover
Avatar

Joined: 05 April 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 622
Post Options Post Options   Quote mAni_paKi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 September 2006 at 9:24pm
Never mind he could be the NXe greatest LEg spinner.Tension not.By the way wats his age?
blaa blaa blaa
Back to Top
dips_december View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar
The next greatest left arm spinner

Joined: 31 March 2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5230
Post Options Post Options   Quote dips_december Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 September 2006 at 1:57pm
He is 34 or 35 .
Back to Top
mAni_paKi View Drop Down
Extra Cover
Extra Cover
Avatar

Joined: 05 April 2006
Location: Pakistan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 622
Post Options Post Options   Quote mAni_paKi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 September 2006 at 3:41pm
if he can make it to Australian team then his career coulkd long for jus 4 years.I think so
blaa blaa blaa
Back to Top
spin wizard View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
The world’s next great spinner

Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9453
Post Options Post Options   Quote spin wizard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 September 2006 at 8:52pm
70 degrees spin, bradman was the unluckiest according "dravid fan" as he missed that average of 100 because of the duck he got from the mischievious googly.
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
Back to Top
dips_december View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar
The next greatest left arm spinner

Joined: 31 March 2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5230
Post Options Post Options   Quote dips_december Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 September 2006 at 5:39am

Originally posted by mAni_paKi

if he can make it to Australian team then his career coulkd long for jus 4 years.I think so

What do you mean by saying he can make it ,macca is already in the aussie test squad .

Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 October 2006 at 7:54pm
But he hardly ever plays.
Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
DRAVID FAN View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3635
Post Options Post Options   Quote DRAVID FAN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 October 2006 at 8:27pm
That's because there is also another human robot called Shane Keith Warne.

I said robot because he turns the ball in such a way that it's almost possible only for a robot.
Back to Top
spin wizard View Drop Down
Opening Bowler
Opening Bowler
Avatar
The world’s next great spinner

Joined: 21 January 2006
Location: Saint Vincent
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9453
Post Options Post Options   Quote spin wizard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 October 2006 at 11:12pm
Macgill can spin it more than him mate!
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
Back to Top
dips_december View Drop Down
Number 3 Batsman
Number 3 Batsman
Avatar
The next greatest left arm spinner

Joined: 31 March 2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5230
Post Options Post Options   Quote dips_december Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 October 2006 at 11:43am

Yep although Warney has more control over his spin ,Macca always tends to take more wickets when both play together .

Here it is :

  Mat  Runs  HS   BatAv 100  50   W    BB  BowlAv 5w  Ct St

overall          ;      40   347  43   10.20   0   0 198  8/108  27.20 12  16  0
                      140  2958  99   16.61   0  11 685  8/71   25.25 36 120  0

v Bangladesh        &n bsp;  4     0   0     -     0   0  33  8/108  15.75  4   2  0
                        2    11   6    5.50   0   0  11  5/113  27.27  1   1  0
v England          ;     6    71  43    8.87   0   0  39  7/50   24.71  3   5  0
                      31   750  90   19.23   0   3 172  8/71   22.30 10  25  0
v ICC World XI         1     0   0     -     0   0   9  5/43    9.11  1   0  0
                        1    12   7    6.00   0   0   6  3/23   11.83  0   0  0
v India         & nbsp;      4     2   1    0.50   0   0  14  4/86   50.78  0   2  0
                      14   309  86   14.71   0   1  43  6/125  47.18  1  10  0
v New Zealand          ; 0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                      20   558  99   32.82   0   5 103  6/31   24.37  3  18  0
v Pakistan        &nbs p;    4    63  23*  31.50   0   0  23  5/66   25.30  2   1  0
                      15   275  86   16.17   0   1  90  7/23   20.17  6  13  0
v South Africa         4    63  29   15.75   0   0  18  4/123  28.44  0   2  0
                      24   460  63   13.93   0   1 130  7/56   24.16  7  19  0
v Sri Lanka         & nbsp;  2    25  17*  25.00   0   0   5  4/74   46.40  0   0  0
                      13   193  35   10.72   0   0  59  5/43   25.54  5  15  0
v West Indies         14   123  22    8.20   0   0  55  7/104  31.27  2   4  0
                      19   384  47   13.71   0   0  65  7/52   29.95  3  19  0
v Zimbabwe        &nbs p;    1     -   -     -     -   -   2  2/54   32.00  0   0  0
                        1     6   6    6.00   0   0   6  3/68   22.83  0   0  0

in Australia        &nb sp; 25   231  43   11.55   0   0 130  7/50   26.24  9  14  0
                      64  1337  99   17.59   0   7 296  8/71   26.08 14  66  0
in Bangladesh        &n bsp; 2     0   0     -     0   0  16  8/108  18.81  1   0  0
                        2    11   6    5.50   0   0  11  5/113  27.27  1   1  0
in England          ;    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                      22   563  90   21.65   0   2 129  7/165  21.94  8  17  0
in India         & nbsp;     0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        9   193  39   12.86   0   0  34  6/125  43.11  1   6  0
in New Zealand         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        9   138  50*  17.25   0   1  49  5/39   21.30  1   6  0
in Pakistan        &nbs p;   3    54  23*  27.00   0   0  15  5/66   27.46  1   1  0
                        3    69  33   17.25   0   0  18  6/136  28.00  2   2  0
in South Africa        0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                      12   294  63   16.33   0   1  61  6/86   24.31  2   9  0
in Sri Lanka         & nbsp; 2    25  17*  25.00   0   0   5  4/74   46.40  0   0  0
                        9   151  35   10.06   0   0  48  7/94   20.45  6   6  0
in U.A.E.               0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        2    30  19   15.00   0   0  16  5/74    9.62  1   2  0
in West Indies         8    37  17    3.36   0   0  32  5/75   32.18  1   1  0
                        7   166  32   15.09   0   0  17  4/70   39.64  0   5  0
in Zimbabwe        &nbs p;   0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        1     6   6    6.00   0   0   6  3/68   22.83  0   0  0

in Africa               0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                      13   300  63   15.78   0   1  67  6/86   24.17  2   9  0
in Americas        &nbs p;   8    37  17    3.36   0   0  32  5/75   32.18  1   1  0
                        7   166  32   15.09   0   0  17  4/70   39.64  0   5  0
in Asia         &n bsp;      7    79  23*  26.33   0   0  36  8/108  26.25  2   1  0
                      25   454  39   11.94   0   0 127  7/94   26.81 11  17  0
in Europe               0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                      22   563  90   21.65   0   2 129  7/165  21.94  8  17  0
in Oceania          ;   25   231  43   11.55   0   0 130  7/50   26.24  9  14  0
                      73  1475  99   17.55   0   8 345  8/71   25.40 15  72  0

home         &n bsp;        25   231  43   11.55   0   0 130  7/50   26.24  9  14  0
                      64  1337  99   17.59   0   7 296  8/71   26.08 14  66  0
away         &n bsp;        15   116  23*   8.28   0   0  68  8/108  29.04  3   2  0
                      73  1591  90   16.23   0   4 362  7/165  25.50 20  52  0
neutral          ;       0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        3    30  19    7.50   0   0  27  7/94   12.66  2   2  0

1992         &n bsp;         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        5   100  35   12.50   0   0  12  7/52   41.91  1   2  0
1993                      0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                       16   283  74*  23.58   0   1  72  6/31   23.56  2  12  0
1994                      0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                       10   134  33    8.93   0   0  70  8/71   18.20  6   6  0
1995                      0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                       12   119  36*   9.15   0   0  52  7/23   24.11  1  10  0
1996                      0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        4   113  33   22.60   0   0  15  4/95   38.06  0   4  0
1997                      0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                       15   360  53   15.65   0   1  68  6/48   24.42  2   7  0
1998                      7   127  43   18.14   0   0  35  5/66   26.20  1   4  0
                        5   121  35   17.28   0   0  24  6/34   33.16  2   5  0
1999                      5    37  17    3.70   0   0  24  7/50   19.12  2   4  0
                       13   347  86   19.27   0   2  38  5/52   32.97  2  13  0
2000                      3    43  19   21.50   0   0   9  2/37   34.33  0   2  0
                        4    36  12    9.00   0   0  15  4/68   33.06  0   5  0
2001                      1     1   1    1.00   0   0   7  7/104  27.42  1   1  0
                       13   312  99   19.50   0   2  58  7/165  31.18  4  14  0
2002                      2    20  20   20.00   0   0  14  5/152  31.00  1   1  0
                       10   313  63   26.08   0   2  67  7/94   19.55  3   8  0
2004                      3    25  17*  25.00   0   0   6  4/74   73.83  0   0  0
                       12   211  53*  11.72   0   1  70  6/125  24.07  5  17  0
2005                      5    55  22   27.50   0   0  26  5/43   19.61  2   0  0
                       15   416  90   20.80   0   2  96  6/46   22.02  6  15  0
2006                      3    29  29   29.00   0   0  20  8/108  21.80  1   0  0
                        6    93  36   13.28   0   0  28  6/86   31.21  2   2  0
2003                    11    10   4*   1.11   0   0  57  5/56   29.59  4   4  0
                        0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -

season 1991/92         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        2    28  20    9.33   0   0   1  1/150 228.00  0   1  0
season 1992         &n bsp;  0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        2    66  35   22.00   0   0   3  3/11   52.66  0   1  0
season 1992/93         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        7    91  22*  10.11   0   0  27  7/52   21.07  1   4  0
season 1993         &n bsp;  0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        6   113  37   37.66   0   0  34  5/82   25.79  1   4  0
season 1993/94         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        9   142  74*  15.77   0   1  51  7/56   18.58  3   6  0
season 1994/95         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                      12   157  36*   8.72   0   0  60  8/71   24.31  4   9  0
season 1995/96         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        6    72  33   18.00   0   0  31  7/23   20.35  1   5  0
season 1996/97         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        8   170  30   14.16   0   0  33  4/43   26.54  0   9  0
season 1997         &n bsp;  0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        6   188  53   18.80   0   1  24  6/48   24.04  1   2  0
season 1997/98         1    10  10   10.00   0   0   5  3/22   26.80  0   1  0
                        9   203  36   16.91   0   0  49  6/34   29.24  3   5  0
season 1998/99        11   154  43    9.62   0   0  54  7/50   23.00  3   7  0
                        4   148  32   21.14   0   0   4  1/43   94.50  0   5  0
season 1999         &n bsp;  0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        3     6   6    1.50   0   0   8  5/52   14.37  1   2  0
season 1999/00         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                      10   229  86   20.81   0   2  41  5/110  30.63  1  11  0
season 2000/01         4    44  19   14.66   0   0  16  7/104  31.31  1   3  0
                        3    50  39   10.00   0   0  10  4/47   50.50  0   2  0
season 2001         &n bsp;  0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        5    13   8    3.25   0   0  31  7/165  18.70  3   6  0
season 2001/02         1    20  20   20.00   0   0   7  4/123  24.85  0   1  0
                        9   415  99   34.58   0   3  43  6/161  31.27  2  11  0
season 2002/03         6     8   4*   1.60   0   0  32  5/75   36.37  2   0  0
                        6   147  57   21.00   0   1  41  7/94   16.80  2   3  0
season 2003         &n bsp;  2     -   -     -     -   -  17  5/56   12.88  3   2  0
                        0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
season 2003/04         7    27  17*   5.40   0   0  21  4/74   47.95  0   2  0
                        3    79  32   13.16   0   0  26  5/43   20.03  4   3  0
season 2004         &n bsp;  0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        2     9   4    2.25   0   0  10  4/70   28.00  0   4  0
season 2004/05         1     9   9*    -     0   0   8  5/87   21.25  1   0  0
                      11   192  53*  17.45   0   2  56  6/125  25.94  2  14  0
season 2005         &n bsp;  0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        5   249  90   27.66   0   1  40  6/46   19.92  3   5  0
season 2005/06         7    75  29   25.00   0   0  38  8/108  20.42  2   0  0
                      12   191  47   12.73   0   0  62  6/80   26.16  4   8  0

toss won         &nb sp;    23   222  43    9.65   0   0 109  7/50   26.16  7  14  0
                      67  1347  86   14.64   0   4 326  8/71   24.36 22  53  0
toss lost         &n bsp;   17   125  29   11.36   0   0  89  8/108  28.48  5   2  0
                      73  1611  99   18.73   0   7 359  7/56   26.05 14  67  0

toss won & batted     18   142  23*   7.10   0   0  78  7/50   30.19  4   9  0
                      54  1103  86   14.32   0   3 264  8/71   24.66 18  40  0
toss won & fielded     5    80  43   26.66   0   0  31  5/56   16.03  3   5  0
                      13   244  86   16.26   0   1  62  6/46   23.11  4  13  0
toss lost & sent in    3     1   1    0.50   0   0  15  5/75   24.26  1   0  0
                      25   556  70   18.53   0   3  91  6/64   29.96  2  25  0
toss lost & fielded   14   124  29   13.77   0   0  74  8/108  29.33  4   2  0
                      48  1055  99   18.83   0   4 268  7/56   24.72 12  42  0

matches batting 1st   21   143  23*   6.50   0   0  93  7/50   29.23  5   9  0
                      79  1659  86   15.50   0   6 355  8/71   26.02 20  65  0
matches fielding 1st  19   204  43   17.00   0   0 105  8/108  25.40  7   7  0
                      61  1299  99   18.29   0   5 330  7/56   24.42 16  55  0

1st team innings      40   302  43   12.58   0   0 106  8/108  27.26  6   8  0
                      140  2220  99   18.19   0  10 341  7/23   27.70 17  68  0
2nd team innings      40    45  17*   4.50   0   0  92  7/50   27.14  6   8  0
                      137   738  53   13.17   0   1 344  8/71   22.81 19  52  0

1st match innings     40    99  23*   7.07   0   0  57  8/108  25.08  5   4  0
                      140  1211  86   18.34   0   5 149  7/56   27.08  5  31  0
2nd match innings     40   203  43   20.30   0   0  49  5/57   29.79  1   4  0
                      140  1009  99   18.01   0   5 192  7/23   28.18 12  37  0
3rd match innings     40    44  17*   5.50   0   0  62  5/56   25.77  4   4  0
                      137   493  53   12.02   0   1 214  6/31   22.86 12  28  0
4th match innings     32     1   1    0.50   0   0  30  7/50   29.96  2   4  0
                      102   245  42   16.33   0   0 130  8/71   22.73  7  24  0

no follow-on        &nb sp; 36   327  43   10.21   0   0 173  8/108  27.20 10  15  0
                      126  2762  99   16.34   0  10 598  8/71   25.96 32 110  0
enforcing a follow-on  4    20  20   10.00   0   0  25  5/75   27.20  2   1  0
                      13   151  50*  21.57   0   1  79  7/23   20.72  4  10  0
in team following on   0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        1    45  45   22.50   0   0   8  4/31   16.62  0   0  0

matches won         &nb sp; 28   210  29   11.66   0   0 156  8/108  22.80 12  10  0
                      87  1634  86   17.02   0   7 487  8/71   22.10 26  81  0
matches drawn          6    64  23*  16.00   0   0  20  4/86   44.15  0   3  0
                      27   661  99   20.65   0   4  96  6/122  36.08  5  23  0
matches lost         &n bsp; 6    73  43    6.08   0   0  22  4/61   43.04  0   3  0
                      26   663  47   13.26   0   0 102  7/56   30.09  5  16  0

won by an innings      7    58  21   29.00   0   0  42  5/56   16.54  4   4  0
                      24   300  74*  20.00   0   1 154  7/23   17.30  8  26  0
won defending target   9    41  17*   4.55   0   0  44  7/50   20.95  3   4  0
                      36   897  86   17.25   0   4 193  8/71   22.34 12  35  0
won chasing target    12   111  29   15.85   0   0  70  8/108  27.71  5   2  0
                      27   437  86   15.06   0   2 140  6/33   27.04  6  20  0
lost by an innings     0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        2    33  13    8.25   0   0   0   -       -    0   1  0
lost defending targ.   2    45  43   11.25   0   0  12  4/61   30.66  0   1  0
                      10   241  42   12.05   0   0  57  7/56   24.26  3   5  0
lost chasing target    4    28  17    3.50   0   0  10  3/84   57.90  0   2  0
                      14   389  47   14.96   0   0  45  5/52   33.08  2  10  0

5 day matches         39   347  43   10.20   0   0 189  8/108  28.06 11  16  0
                      139  2946  99   16.73   0  11 679  8/71   25.36 36 120  0
6 day matches          ; 1     0   0     -     0   0   9  5/43    9.11  1   0  0
                        1    12   7    6.00   0   0   6  3/23   11.83  0   0  0

1st/Only Tests        11    65  21    9.28   0   0  60  8/108  19.11  4   3  0
                      42  1006  86   17.05   0   3 229  8/71   22.51 11  34  0
2nd Tests         & nbsp;   10    75  20*  15.00   0   0  41  5/56   31.04  2   4  0
                      40   723  70   16.43   0   4 221  7/52   22.27 15  37  0
3rd Tests         & nbsp;   11   147  29   13.36   0   0  51  5/75   30.21  2   3  0
                      39   965  99   20.10   0   4 156  6/33   32.26  6  29  0
4th Tests         & nbsp;    5    51  43    8.50   0   0  22  5/152  40.95  1   2  0
                        9    79  45    6.58   0   0  28  4/31   32.64  0   6  0
5th Tests         & nbsp;    3     9   6    1.80   0   0  24  7/50   21.87  3   4  0
                        8    99  30    9.00   0   0  42  7/165  24.61  4  12  0
6th Tests         & nbsp;    0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                        2    86  37   21.50   0   0   9  3/78   26.33  0   2  0

in series won         32   314  43   14.27   0   0 172  8/108  25.13 12  13  0
                      104  1992  86   16.06   0   8 531  8/71   24.34 27  96  0
in series lost         0     -   -     -     -   -   -   -       -    -   -  -
                      21   521  90   15.32   0   1  96  7/52   28.89  7  14  0
in series drawn        8    33  17    2.75   0   0  26  4/86   40.88  0   3  0
                      15   445  99   22.25   0   2  58  7/56   27.53  2  10  0

Back to Top
DRAVID FAN View Drop Down
Middle-Order Batsman
Middle-Order Batsman
Avatar

Joined: 27 November 2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3635
Post Options Post Options   Quote DRAVID FAN Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 October 2006 at 12:56pm
That was a really long statistic.
Back to Top
TCA123 View Drop Down
Wicket-Keeper
Wicket-Keeper
Avatar

Joined: 24 June 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1637
Post Options Post Options   Quote TCA123 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 October 2006 at 8:26pm
unreadable  i can't understand it
Offspinner,
Right Arm Bat
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.71
Copyright ©2001-2011 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.859 seconds.