bowling actions |
Post Reply 
|
| Author |
 Share Topic Printable Version Delicious Digg Facebook Furl Google Boomarks Google Buzz MySpace Newsvine reddit StumbleUpon Translate Twitter Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks Topic Search  Topic Options
|
LethalYorker 
Test Debutant 
Joined: 07 October 2007 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 48 |
 Post Options
 Quote Reply
 Topic: bowling actionsPosted: 25 December 2007 at 8:54pm |
|
my question is that i am interested in fast bowling especially with a front on action but im quite short so can someone tell me is front on action only for people who are tall or are there any quiete short bowlers in international cricket who bowl front on. So can someone help me?
|
|
 |
|
|
NZ_Fast
Wicket-Keeper 
Joined: 21 August 2006 Location: New Zealand Online Status: Offline Posts: 1928 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 December 2007 at 11:58pm |
|
Bowling front on is for anyone, off the top of my head i cant think of any short int cricketers with a front on action...actually i cant really think of any pace bowlers that are short except for maybe James Anderson?
Just give it a go bowling front on, i switched to it after having constant biomechanical problems bowling side on just over a year ago, and now i am a much better bowler, i am nearly 6 foot tall though. Edited by NZ_Fast - 26 December 2007 at 2:48am |
|
|
|
|
spin wizard
Opening Bowler
The world’s next great spinner Joined: 21 January 2006 Location: Saint Vincent Online Status: Offline Posts: 9453 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 December 2007 at 1:41am |
|
Malcolm Marshall wasn't tall and he bowled front on. I prefer front on action really. Such ease on the body - you'll be less prone to injury bowling front on than side on. |
|
|
In troubled times, being philosophical helps a great deal, it helps you to remain sane and not do any further damage.
|
|
|
|
|
RightHandBat
Wicket-Keeper
The next best batsman Joined: 27 January 2006 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 1399 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 December 2007 at 7:18am |
|
Well, can't really think of somebody who is short with a front on action, but me myself, I'm 6 foot 1 and have an action sortof in the middle. Not front on, not side on and it feels really good on the body, not much strain after bowling long spells.
|
|
|
"His classical hits down the ground, met with a checked drive, were Tendulkar at his best. It was though he had a new lease of life." - Sachin Tendulkar's return to cricket with a 91-Ball century.
|
|
|
|
|
Smack
3rd Man
Joined: 13 March 2006 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 189 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2007 at 6:28pm |
|
There's been a few shortish pace bowlers...currently in the game Fidel Edwards (5ft 8in)and Mohammad Sami could be the shortest around. Funny enough both bowl 90mph +. Both are side on bowlers tho. I'd say if you want to bowl really fast then your unlikely to achieve that as a short man bowling front on. But that doesnt mean you cant take wickets by swinging and seaming the ball and being accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
benkola13
3rd Man
Joined: 05 April 2007 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 185 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 02 January 2008 at 5:25pm |
James Anderson for England? He isn't small. He is 6ft odd.
|
|
|
|
|
inswinger
Square Leg
King Of Swing Joined: 14 August 2007 Location: England Online Status: Offline Posts: 397 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 January 2008 at 10:27pm |
|
haha i was jstu about to say!
he's 6ft 2 same as hoggy  but for the origional person...i think bowling front on is ment to drag the ball down when you bowl but thats jsut what ive heard. for me i have no control bowling front on over anything...line length, pace etc. but its your choice... |
|
|
RightFastMedium
RightHandBat |
|
|
|
|
fishcake14
Opener
Joined: 11 May 2006 Location: Scotland Online Status: Offline Posts: 2173 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 January 2008 at 10:32pm |
|
It depends, definitely for spin it's like a sin to have a front-on action. You do get successful front-on pace bowlers though, so yeah, like inswinger says, it's your choice - if front-on works better, stick with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NZ_Fast
Wicket-Keeper
Joined: 21 August 2006 Location: New Zealand Online Status: Offline Posts: 1928 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 January 2008 at 12:23am |
|
Front on, it definitely is easier to bowl shorter deliveries i.e bouncers, but i find because everything is just going straight instead of being side on and having to bring your body around it is also much, much easier to bowl line and length, while also just as easy to bowl swingers or cutting the ball.
Edited by NZ_Fast - 04 January 2008 at 12:24am |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
