CricketWorld Cricket News Site
facebook twitter youtube rss

Where Most People Go Wrong With Cricket Coaching Advice

13 February 2013
Where Most People Go Wrong With Cricket Coaching Advice
Where Most People Go Wrong With Cricket Coaching Advice
Some top-class players, like Gary Kirsten, do go on to become successful coaches, but not all make it
©REUTERS / Action Images

There is simple shorthand for what defines a good coach: reputation is everything. We look at a player's first-class or international record and that helps us decide if we should follow his advice.

But you wouldn’t go to the dentist if you had a broken leg. So why go to a former player to fix your broken technique?

Of course, experience goes a long way but coaching cricket is a completely different set of skills than playing.

A good coach is able identify issues in other people. He can communicate complex information in a manner that is understandable to the audience. He has to be flexible enough to deal with different personalities. He has to be dedicated to the improvement of others through continual development.

Good players may have those skills, but you don’t get them by being able to hit a cricket ball for six or bowl it at 100mph.

The false positive: social proof

Now, I do get it.

It’s tough to work out how a good a coach really is until you work with him. One way of deciding is based on the proof that he has coached himself to a high level. The logic is clear; if he knows how to do it, he can show you how to do it.

Many players do know, but many are vague and talk about working hard or just pass on advice that was taught to them by their coaches. There is no critical thinking or analysis.

Using a first-class record as proof of coaching skill is fatally flawed.

Meanwhile coaches with a more modest record are ignored. Some of these coaches are much better skilled in developing players than the high-profile names. Look at the likes of PitchVision coaches Gary Palmer, Mark Garaway and Adrian Shaw.

Their professional records are variable, but their coaching skills are unmatched.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying all ex-internationals are poor coaches and all lesser skilled cricketers become world-class coaches. Many top players also have great coaching skill-sets.

We just need to recognise that experience has nothing to do with coaching skill.

That way the excellent coaches will rise to the top rather than the ones with the biggest names.

And if you want to get excellent coaching from coaches selected for their coaching abilities rather than their playing reputation, take a look at the PitchVision Academy courses section. Every coach is hand-picked to get you the best experience and the biggest improvement possible.

by David Hinchclife, PitchVision Academy
© 2013 miSport Ltd

Other Top Stories
As a fast bowler it's not all milk and honey in the land of the favourable pitch. The expectation is that you will slice through the top order in no time.
Here is an over-rated phrase: "That shot is straight out of the textbook!" The truth is that in the modern era of cricket we hear it less and less. It's no longer relevant, if it ever was.
No country can consistently produce fast bowlers. Why? It's clearly desirable and clearly possible: the West Indies proved this in the 1980s.
Good cricketers are strong. They may not look like big chested hulks (although some like Kallis, Flintoff and Irfan Pathan come close) but to bowl quick, put revs on the ball or hit the ball hard you need to have strength.
If you had to put cricket into one word, what would you choose? Some say it's about angles. Others talk about hand-eye coordination, or athleticism. All those things are important but I would choose a different word.
Culture. It's one of those words that get banded about in sport and in business as an explanation for everything.
Club Cricket - General Li